Preview

On the Moral Permissibility of Suicide

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1661 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
On the Moral Permissibility of Suicide
On the Moral Permissiveness of Suicide Euthanasia and suicide have a long history of producing polarized opinions. Although neither explicitly used the word euthanasia, eighteenth-century philosophers David Hume and Immanuel Kant's opposed views on the morality of suicide pertain greatly to the modern debate. It is safe to say, when considering the arguments proposed by either philosopher, that David Hume would be greatly in favour whereas Kant would be vehemently opposed. Both philosophers use the same criteria to frame their argument; both men agree that suicide can only be considered morally wrong if it constitutes a transgression of our duty either to society or ourselves (both philosophers also mention our duty to God, but these theological discussions do not pertain to the modern debate on euthanasia). Hume, in his essay On Suicide, concludes that suicidal-acts do not transgress either of these duties. Kant, contrarily, concludes in both Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, as well as his Metaphysics of Morals, that suicidal-acts transgress both. The nature of these arguments (concerning duty to ourselves and others), as well as the vastly conclusions drawn by either man, seem to reflect the modern debate on euthanasia. By comparing the respective opinions of both men we can therefore imagine a debate on euthanasia between the great minds of David Hume and Immanuel Kant. As previously mentioned, both philosophers contemplate whether
2
committing suicidal-acts violate the duties owed others and ourselves. We can then ask, to begin, how would euthanasia violate our duty to ourselves? Hume believes there are some instances where suicide is undoubtedly consistent with our duties to ourselves. Life may be rendered more unbearable than death and prolonging a miserable experience is therefore a disservice to oneself. Furthermore, given the intensity with which people fear death, (and this is a reasonable claim - Kant would also agree that people

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, for Hume, he believes a person does no harm in committing suicide but he “merely ceases to do well”. I would assume that we all have an obligation to do good in our world, and if to good means to harm ourselves to death, then there should be no reason why suicide is wrong. Hume even argues that in some cases “a person may have become a burden to society, and so actually do most food by committing suicide”. Hume argues that suicide is better than morally neutral, it is morally…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    suicide is unethical because it disregards the value of human life and violates the nonmalfeasance principle of doing no harm to others.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Margaret Pabst Battin is a professor at the University of Utah. She is a professor of philosophy and internal medicine, Division of Medical Ethics. The thesis of this article is “I believe that this opposition to euthanasia is in serious moral error—on grounds of mercy, autonomy, and justice.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Research Paper on Euthanasia

    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages

    One of the most hotly debated ethical issue of our time is one of Euthanasia. Euthanasia comes from the Greek words “Eu”, meaning well or easy, and “Thanatos”, meaning death. In modern terms it is the intentional premature termination of another’s life by direct intervention or by withholding care.[1] Within that it can be either voluntary (expressed or implied consent), or involuntary. The two sides of this debate are the rights of an individual to decide when he or she is to die, or the sanctity of life and the states responsibility to protect people.…

    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue concerning assisted suicide is an extensively debated ethical affair. The debate stems from different viewpoints first concerning when the act is considered appropriate and then what the resulting consequences would look like if the act were permissible (Lo, 2005). Ethical decisions in assisted suicide are debated along the lines concerned with the worthy nature of life and on what is entailed in a life that is worth living and consequently, who ultimately decides this. Many religions, however, hold that life is Gods’ gift, which should not be interfered with let alone be destroyed (Lo, 2005).…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument that has sent the world into a tailspin is whether or not people suffering from terminal or excruciatingly painful illness have the right to take their own lives by way of physician-assisted suicide. Proponents contend that what one does with one 's life is of no consequence to anyone else -- that it is humane to allow someone to be relieved of constant – if not unbearable – discomfort. On the other hand, critics claim that the act of euthanasia is nothing more than a fabricated form of murder. Indeed, both sides have pertinent points when it comes to understanding and assessing the conflict, but euthanasia supporters have a significantly stronger argument when considering the bigger picture. Clearly, physician-assisted suicide is not only the right thing to do for someone seeking such a decision, but it is ethical and humane for a physician to abide by the patient 's wish.…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assisted suicide is defined as a controversial medical and ethical issue based on the question of whether, in certain situations, medical practitioners should be allowed to help patients actively determine the time and circumstances of their death. An assisted suicide is usually a situation where a patient is terminally ill, and a doctor prescribes a lethal dose of medication for the patient to ingest when they choose. Another way this is done is when the doctor discontinues giving certain treatment, at request of the patient. The conflict of whether assisted suicide is right or wrong has many different branches in the aspects of ethical, social, and legal issues, often with two main arguments; on the supporting side, people say that everyone should have the right to decide the time, place, and circumstances of his/her death, while the opposing side of this issue state that assisted suicide infers that certain people’s lives are…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suicide is the intentional termination of one's own life with the objective being to cease living. For the purposes of this essay, self-sacrifice, or suicide for the sake of others, will not be considered a form of suicide as in that situation the individual does not possess the desire to die, they are instead putting the lives of others above their own. The standard position on suicide holds that all suicides are immoral and irrational except for in cases of terminal illness. This position on suicide is too restrictive and dismisses the suffering others experiences in instances beyond terminal illness. There are extreme situations in which most would agree that suicide is an acceptable choice. For example, someone trapped in a fire or subjected…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assissted Suicide

    • 2038 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The greatest human freedom is to live, and die, according to one 's own desires and beliefs. The question whether an individual has the right to choose between these two has been debated for decades among physicians, politicians and philosophers. No right to suicide can be found in any social compact. The aforementioned question does not have a clear answer so this paper will provide arguments from both sides, describe the issues that need concern and provide specific details why this policy is inconsistent. Because opinions vary across cultures, this paper will be focused solely on describing the situation as it is presently in the United States of America.…

    • 2038 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assisted suicide and euthanasia are distinguished by who is acting to end the life and what is the intention of ending the life. Assisted suicide is when an individual deliberately chooses to end their own life, differentiated from the general act of suicide by the fact that a second individual is deliberately cooperating to provide the means. It is important to emphasize that the person herself is taking the action to end her life, whether the means are by firearm, injection, or medication. This means that not only is no one else’s finger on the trigger, but also assumes that no one has forced the person to take this action. Thus, the individual agency is a defining…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We must also remember suicide is the ninth leading cause of death in the United States. Public Health Officials see suicide as a national healthcare crisis, not some moral failing. In almost every suicide case (one figure I saw was nine out of ten, but I don't have the reference handy), the suicide could have been prevented through medical intervention.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant would refer to the categorical imperatives when making his decision. “His first formulation of categorical imperative talks about man being a rational being; since he is a rational being, he has no right to formulate such a maxim like “if I am in a terrible condition, I have the right to take my life or reserve the right to the doctor or my family members”” (Odianosen 9). When talking about Kant, Odianosen clearly agrees and supports that the categorical imperatives point in the direction away from any sort of euthanasia. In this quote that Odianosen uses, he is stating that the rational part of humans shall not call for something as ridicules as euthanasia. Of course Catholics and Kant believe in stopping human euthanasia, but Kant’s peculiar reasoning behind this is quite different from a Catholic’s thought of not disrespecting God’s holy creations. In An Introduction to Catholic Ethics by Longtin and Peach, thoroughly explain that in Kantian ethics, one must follow the moral law for the sake of the moral law itself. This means that one must not use euthanasia not because it may be considered murder and not because it might disrespect God, but because euthanasia in itself is unethical. Since murder is also a universal law, people cannot simply use someone as a means to an end meaning that is euthanasia is wanted mainly because insurance money is given out more quickly. Indeed, although their reasoning may be different, overall Catholics and Kant would…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This definitely wasn’t the case of what the philosopher David Hume believed when he argued that” the body is a person 's property and he may decide what to do with it. If one is forced to live against his will, the basic right of free will is violated” (Campos) Which I think is wrong as we truly belong to god and that suicide is not a right, but rather living is an obligation for us.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The euthanasia debate heavily relies on the existence of a significant moral difference between active and passive euthanasia, also known as the killing versus letting die argument. Some may argue that killing is morally wrong because it "involves a person's causing the death of another person," while letting someone die would simply be seen as "allowing nature do its work" (Vaughn, 2013, p. 287). Due to the differing views on the legitimacy of the euthanasia debate, the presence of a gray area exists on the consequences and implications brought forth by both sides of the argument.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The arguments opposing the legalization of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide include a wide range of varying ideals. There are those who are against these practices for religious reasons, the act of suicide or the taking of a life are viewed as Mortal, unforgivable, sins. Those who have philosophical notions that conflict with the basic idea of taking a life, and even those that worry these practices could somehow lead to Nazi like genocide. The most common arguments against the legalization of these practices are called the “Slippery Slope”, the fear that the allowance of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide would lead to an unacceptable abuse of the process and push us toward the unthinkable, involuntary euthanasia.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics