The first theme I shall look at is military influence and might. Augustus’s Res Gestae says that he had around 500,000 Roman citizens bound to him by a military oath and that just over 300,000 soldiers/ veterans had been assigned lands or been given money for their dutiful service. The point here is that the soldiers are…
Titus Flavius Vespasian was well known for restoring peace and stability to an empire in disarray following the death of Nero in A.D. 68. In the process he established the Flavian dynasty as the legitimate successor to the imperial throne.…
Morey, William C., Outlines of Roman History (American Book Company, 1907 available on: http://www.forumromanum.org/history/morey01.html accessed on 5/02/2012)…
Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…
Mustering a meager force of 10,000 Roman soldiers in total with the XIV Legion,…
The Fall of the Roman Republic Lynn Hunt’s analysis of the Roman Republic is far more compelling than Polybius’s. Although Polybius writes concisely about the individual institutions within the Roman Republic and how they overlap, he superimposes his mixed constitution bias as his analysis seems more focused on the theoretical outline available in the constitution. On the other hand, Hunt is not so strictly tied to the constitutional ideas of the institutions and explores how in practice they have evolved and deviated from the attributes and responsibilities originally constructed in the Roman constitution.…
At the end of Hannibal’s career as a military commander of Carthage, a main enemy of Rome, it can be said that his career was a failure as he did not achieve his primary objective, the taking of Rome. However, his military achievements glittered and shone because he struck fear into Rome and he also earned himself a place in the modern world as the father of strategy. Hannibal will always be remembered and regarded as one of the greatest military tacticians and strategists in all of European history and is considered one of the greatest generals of the Ancient World. It was his superior strategy and tactical skills that allowed him to compete with and almost defeat Rome, but this greatness prevented him achieving his ultimate goal, because he could not take the major military risk that was actually required to defeat Rome when it was in a weakened state. For this reason, it a fair assessment to say that Hannibal’s career was a failure but of the most glittering kind, because while he failed to take Rome, he left a substantial legacy that was even more important in terms of the shaping of the ancient world.…
The understanding of the short term significance of Agricola in Roman Britain is heavily dependent on historical texts and what they tell us. According to these historical texts there is no denying that Agricola was of short term significance in military and cultural terms, but the degree of his significance comes into question according to each individual historian opinion. Most of the knowledge we have on Agricola comes from his son in law Tacitus. Leading to the inference that this would affect the general opinion on Agricola, as the only substantial information we have on him is faultlessly positive. It could be suggested that this unblemished depiction of Agricola would somehow influence the way in which his degree of significance militarily and culturally would be viewed, effectively causing his significance to be overestimated. This suggestion is supported by historians such as Russell and Laycock that suggest our understanding of Agricola’s short term significance is tainted by the picture painted of him for us by Tacitus.…
During the expansion of Rome and the acquisition of new territory, the Roman armies were often met by heavy resistance and bloody conflicts. The armies needed a type of protection that would safely protect soldiers and would ensure victory for Rome.…
Rome, in the past had fought Germans, and either lost, or taken heavy casualties. This great history of war between the two, from Tacitus’s usage of writing, is most well-known to the people of Rome. All throughout Chapter 37, page 56, Tacitus lists numerous defeats of the glorious Roman armies at the hands of the Germans. “During this long period there have been great losses”. (Germ, pg. 56)…
The traditional dates for the Roman Republic are 509 to 27 B.C. The latter part of this period from 133 to 27 B.C. is known as the late Republic. It is also known as the Roman Revolution. The result of this revolution was the emergence of the Roman Empire and the catalyst has traditionally been linked to a single Roman citizen called Tiberius Gracchus. The wake of his brief political career left Rome much different than it had been. Like a crack in the wall of a dam, Tiberius revealed a weakness in the Roman system of government that would soon spider out of control until it could no longer hold back the deluge of the building political tension. What was this weakness?…
Though the slaves lacked military training, they displayed a skillful use of available local materials and unusual tactics when facing the disciplined Roman armies. They spent the winter of 73–72 BC training, arming and equipping their new recruits, and expanding their raiding territory to include the towns of Nola, Nuceria, Thurii and Metapontum. The distance between these locations and the subsequent events indicate that the slaves operated in two groups commanded by the remaining leaders Spartacus and Crixus.…
The Roman army was also a regular force, although not always a volunteer force. Because of the frequency of battle, the Senate created a professional army. The soldiers in the army were paid for their time away from their families and livelihood. There was also a draft, with all men of military age eligible for up to sixteen years of service. A professional army also meant plenty of time for training. The frequency of battle also created a mammoth force of…
All good things come to an end. Rome was a seamlessly powerful empire, but just like any powerful civilization, it was bound to come to a halt eventually. After centuries of peace and prosperity and being the center of the world at the time, the empire was doomed to fall. It took many years of bloody wars, government reforms, and economic power to reach its peak; therefore, it would take many more years of wars and deterioration of the economy to a dwindling civilization. This phenomenal empire declined for many factors such as religious, political, health, and technological factors. Most of the factors came from within the city, which led to internal decay. Many foolish decisions and revisions caused the heart and soul of Rome to crumble.…
tried to build a more solid senate but failed to take power away from the…