Preview

Olympic Airways Vs Raisin Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
479 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Olympic Airways Vs Raisin Case Study
Citation: Olympic Airways v. Rubina Husain Supreme Court of the United States, 2004 470 U. S., at 406 470 U. S., at 404

Summarize: In December 1997, Dr. Abid Hanson and his wife, Rubina Husain (hereinafter respondent), traveled with their children and another family from San Francisco to Athens and Cairo for a family vacation. During a stopover in New York, Dr. Hanson learned for the first time that petitioner allowed its passengers to smoke on international flights. Because Dr. Hanson had suffered from asthma and was sensitive to secondhand smoke, respondent requested and obtained seats away from the smoking section. After boarding, they discovered that their seats were only three rows in front of the smoking section. A flight attendant refused respondent's three requests to move Dr. Hanson. As the smoking noticeably increased, Dr. Hanson walked toward the front of the plane to get fresher air. He then received medical assistance but died. Respondents filed a wrongful-death suit in state court, which was removed to federal court. The District Court found petitioner liable for Dr. Hanson's death, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed, concluding that, under Saks' definition of "accident," the flight attendant's refusal to reseat Dr. Hanson was clearly external to him, and unexpected and unusual in light of industry standards, Olympic policy, and the simple nature of the requested accommodation.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shortly after plaintiff Nosrat Khajavi (Khajavi), an anesthesiologist, and defendant, Robert Del Pero, a surgeon, engaged in an altercation over the wisdom of proceeding with a particular surgery, defendant Feather River Anesthesia Medical Group (Feather River) terminated Khajavi’s employment. At trial, the court non-suited Khajavi’s claims that defendants Feather River and Robert Del Pero had discharged him, and conspired to discharge him, in violation of public policy -- that is, in retaliation for advocating “medically appropriate health care” in violation of Business and Professions Code section 2056.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, the defendant, Fernando Maldonado, sued the plaintiff, Gateway Hotel of St. Louis for negligence after having received a knockout that interfered with his cognitive and motor functioning. Later, Gateway appeals the jury verdict in favor of the appellee on his negligence claims. Maldonado claimed the idea of negligence based on the piece of evidence that hotel had failed to provide an ambulance as well as an immediate medical monitoring team when he became unconscious. There are notable core legal issues in this case. To begin with, it is notable that the defendant cited the idea that delay of the ambulance had caused his condition to worsen, although he was later transferred to a hospital through an ambulance. In a huge way, he…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dustin Soldano v. Howard O’Daniels case models the common dispute between negligence and a party’s responsibility in an event. Likewise, chapter 1 of the Legal Environment textbook features Kuehn v. Pub Zone, a case that demonstrates a different scenario but the same battle of negligence and liability. The commonalities between the two cases support one another in the demonstration of the judges’ decisions as well as contribute to later common law.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coughlin V Tailhook

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: During a convention at the Las Vegas Hilton in September 1991, Navy Lieutenant Paula Coughlin was attacked by a group of men in a hotel hallway. The resulting post-traumatic stress disorder and other problems related to the attack eventually hampered her ability to perform her duties. Ultimately, she resigned from the US Navy. Coughlin brought action against the Hilton Hotels Corporation (HCC), the Las Vegas Hilton Corporation (LVHC) and the Tailhook Association for negligence seeking both compensatory and punitive damages. “Her complaint alleged that LVHC and HHC had acted with conscious disregard for known safety standards and measures.” (Retrieved from www.ca9.uscourts.gov on December 5, 2007) The Tailhook Association settled out of court for a sum of $400,000.00.The jury found LVHC and HHC negligent and awarded Coughlin $1.7 million in compensatory damages, punitive damages of $2.62 million against LVHC, and $2.3 million against HHC. HCC and LVHC appeal.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Snow Storm Lawsuit Summary

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This case is about a lawsuit that generated from a small community hospital due to a snow storm. During the storm many hospital health care providers were unable to report to work due to the weather, and the Chief Executive Officer was vacationing in the Bahamas. In the meantime, many patients suffered from lack of care and injuries. As a result, many relatives of those patients decided to sue the hospital on their behalf after they died a year later for negligence, duty of care, and wrongful death. This paper will identify and explain the legal, ethical, professional, and business considerations that the hospital would have to face under the unfortunate circumstances.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Turner V Mandalay

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case begin when Mrs. Turner filed a complaint in district court against the Las Vegas 51s, alleging negligence and Mr. Turner complaint for loss of consortium, and negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED). The district court concluded that Mrs. Turner’s negligence claim failed because the Las Vegas 51s did not owe a duty to protect her from the foul ball in question. Also, Mr. Turner’s claim for loss of consortium and NIED failed because 51s satisfied their legal duty in this case as matter of law. The court entered summary judgment in the 51’s favor on that claim.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts. On the morning of August 31, 1986, Theresa Estrada left her home near Cerritos, California, to go shopping at a nearby grocery store. She left her husband at home reading the newspaper, and her three children were still in bed. Returning from the store, Estrada saw, heard, and felt a big explosion. Within minutes, she maneuvered her way through burning homes, cars, and debris to find her home engulfed in flames. Her husband and children died in the house. Although she did not know it at the time, an Aeromexico passenger airplane had crashed into her home after colliding with a privately owned plane. Estrada suffered severe emotional distress from the incident. She sued for the wrongful death of her family. Aeromexico was found not responsible for the accident. The jury found the private pilot 50 percent liable, and the United States 50 percent liable because air traffic controllers had failed to detect the private plane's intrusion into commercial airspace and give a traffic advisory to the Aeromexico flight. The jury awarded Estrada $5.5 million for the death of her family and $1 million for negligent infliction of emotional distress. The U.S. government appealed the $500,000 judgment against it for negligent infliction of emotional distress.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Usa Vs Williams

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page

    In Philip Morris, USA v. Williams was a case about a widow who was married to Jesse Williams who died of lung cancer (smoking related) in 1997 and sued the cigaratte manufacture for false advertising (fraud) based on their advertisements and sponsored studies that made cigarettes seem less dangerous than they actually were. At trial, the jury decided for Williams and awarded over 800 thousand dollars in compensatory damages and 79.5 million dollars in punitive damages. Later, the Supreme Court said that under BMW v. Gore, punitive damages must be reasonably related to the harm done to the plaintiff, but larger punitive damage awards may be appropriate if the defendant displayed reprehensible conduct. Citing Gore, the Oregon Court of Appeals…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flight, M. (2004). Law, liability, and ethics for medical office professionals. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Respondents were charged with causing their son 's death by criminal negligence in that they denied him the necessaries of life without lawful excuse and thereby committed manslaughter. They raised the defence of an honest although mistaken belief in the existence of a circumstance which would render their conduct non-culpable. Respondents were convicted of manslaughter and appealed to the Court of Appeal which set aside the convictions and directed new trials. This appeal was taken by leave.…

    • 15694 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wrightsman, L. E., Kassin, S.M, Willis, C.E (Ed.). (1987). In the jury box: Controversies in…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case established negligence as a wrongful act for which there was a legal liability.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jury Vs Grand Jury

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Along the way and in 1987, these 2 house staffers will be taken before a grand jury for possible murder charges and while the grand jury will not charge them with murder, it will charge them with 38 counts of gross negligence &/or gross incompetence. Under New York law, the investigative body for these charges was the Hearing Committee of the State Board for Professional Medical Conduct and between April 1987 and January 1989, this committee will have conducted 30 hearings at which 33 witnesses, including expert witnesses in toxicology, emergency medicine, and chairmen of internal medicine departments at six prominent medical schools will testify, and many of whom will state under oath that they had never heard of the interaction between…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This chapter also includes information on sexual harassment and pregnancy discrimination laws to illustrate that equal opportunity is a diverse concept and covers a wide range of employees.…

    • 8582 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scenario: As pedestrians exited at the close of an arts and crafts show, Jason Davis, an employee of the show’s producer, stood near the exit. Suddenly and without warning, Davis turned around and collided with Yvonne Esposito, an 80-year-old woman. Esposito was knocked to the ground, fracturing her hip. After hip replacement surgery, she was left with a permanent physical impairment. Esposito filed suit in a federal district court against Davis and others, alleging negligence.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays