Preview

Oil Drilling in Alaska Wilderness

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2553 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Oil Drilling in Alaska Wilderness
Oil Drilling in the Alaskan Wildlife Refuges
America Should Reject the Oil Businesses Plan and
Permanently Protect The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, comprising more than nineteen million acres in the northern corner of Alaska, is unique and one of the largest units of the National Wildlife system. The Arctic Refuge has long been recognized as an unparalleled place of natural beauty and ecological importance. The Arctic Refuge was established to conserve fish and wildlife populations and habitats in their natural diversity, as well as provide the opportunity for local residents to continue their subsistence way of life. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which manages the Refuge, calls it "the only conservation system unit that protects, in an undisturbed condition, a complete spectrum of the arctic ecosystems in North America." (‘Alaska Wild ')
As early as the 1930 's, leading biologists and conservationists were captivated by the scenic beauty and wildlife diversity of Alaska 's northeastern Arctic. In the early 1950 's, a survey was conducted by the National Park Service to determine which Alaskan lands merited protection. This northeast corner was deemed, "the finest park prospect ever seen." After years of political battles and activism, supporters of the Arctic Refuge achieved victory. On December 6, 1960, during the Eisenhower Administration, Interior

Secretary Fred Seaton signed Public Land Order No. 2214. This order established the 8.9 million acre Arctic National Wildlife Range to protect the wildlife, wilderness and recreational values. This order closed the area to mineral entry. Twenty years later, Congress passed and President Jimmy Carter signed the Alaskan National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). This more than doubled the original size to 19.8 million acres and established 8.6 million acres of the original area as wilderness (‘Alaska Wild ').
This



Cited: "Your Voice for Alaska 's Wilderness in the Nation 's Capital." Alaska Wilderness League. Online. Internet. 31 Oct. 2001. Available http://alaskawild.org "Oil Drilling in the Arctic Refuge, A New Look at Old Estimates." Alaska Wilderness League. Online. Internet. 24 Nov. 2001. Available http://alaskawild.org/oil_estimates.html "The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: The Next Chapter." Online. Internet. 5 Nov. 2001. Available http://www.cnie.org/nle/nrgen-23.html "Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, Coastal Plain Resource Assessment." Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Development Issues. August 2001. Online. Internet. 5 Nov. 2001. Available http://www.csa.com/hottopics/ern/0laug/01aug18.html "Don 't Allow Big Oil to Drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge." Defenders of Wildlife. October 2001. Online. Internet. 25 Oct. 2001. Available http://www.defenders.org/wildlife/arctic/overview.html "Congress Will Take a Break, Will Return on November 26th." Audubon. 19 November 2001. Online. Internet. 24 Nov. 2001. Available http://www.protectthearctic.com "Organized Labor Opposes Drilling." State PIRGs ' Arctic Wilderness Campaign. 19 April 2002. Online. Internet. 20 April 2002. Available http://savethearctic.com/arctic.asp "Senate Rejects Arctic Refuge Drilling Amendment." U.S. PIRG Online Newsroom 18 April 2002. Online. Internet. 19 April 2002. Available http://uspirg.org/uspirgnewsroom.asp "America Should Reject Big Oil 's Tired Old Tune." Press Statement: The Wilderness Society. 28 September 2001. Online. Internet. 24 Nov. 2001. Available http://www.tws.org/newsroom/arctic_oil_092800.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Alaskan National Wilderness Refuge has been the topic of political debate for decades. A large, beautiful piece of the world, ANWR as it is often referred to, is not a only a refuge for hundreds of species of birds, fish and mammals, but also a political battleground that is used to ignite the debate on America’s dependence on foreign fuel sources. The possibility of drilling for oil in ANWR brings with it the promise of jobs, dependency from unstable countries for our fuel needs and a boost to our declining economy. However, drilling in this land also brings the possibility of destroying the habitat of birds that migrate to this area yearly, caribou that use this haven as a calving ground, fish that fill the rivers and lakes, as well as grizzly bears, wolves, elk and hundreds of other species that depend on this habitat for food, shelter and safety. There is no debate that there are passionate debates, important facts and amazing possibilities that concern both sides of this argument. And even if it were possible to remove political agenda from the table, it would still be a very difficult debate to win for either side. My hopes are to come to a conclusion that would benefit both parties involved. I strongly feel that any drilling in this area would be detrimental to the surrounding area, as well as bring possible harm to the countless animals, birds and fish that use this safe haven yearly for migration, calving and egg laying and feeding. The decision to either drill or not to drill may not have a direct impact on us now, but in the years to come, good or bad, we will all see the changes that this decision will have resulted in.…

    • 2026 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Domestic Oil Drilling

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nixon, Robin. "Oil Drilling: Risks and Rewards | LiveScience." Live Science. 25 June 2008. Web. 06 Feb. 2012. <http://www.livescience.com/4979-oil-drilling-risks-rewards.html>.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    DRILLING IN ANWR

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alaskan men have a long history of struggling to survive in the wilderness. Today, some, like the Gwich 'in, a native Alaskan tribe, still choose to live off nature. Recently, though a new argument has come to Alaska, one that could destroy the traditions of the Gwich’in forever. Politicians, environmentalists, economists and neighbors now fight over the prospect of oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Many of the arguments for drilling are worth consideration; however, in comparison to the evidence against it, they are neither convincing nor compelling.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Endless Recovery

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Geologists have estimated the total amount of oil beneath the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 1002 Area by drilling cores and conducting ground, air, and seismic surveys to map underground rock formations. This amount differs from the “technically recoverable” and “economically recoverable” because the “technically recoverable” ranges from 4.3-11.8 billion barrels, while the estimated amount ranges from 11.6-31.5 billion barrels.…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To Drill or Not to Drill

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Allowing or outlawing off shore oil drilling is a complex issue including environmental issues and a lack of readily available alternatives. Despite the problems of global warming and possible disasters like the British Petroleum spill in 2010, many Americans still feel as though offshore drilling will provide some sort of relief in fuel prices. Offshore drilling is not a solution to the nation’s long-term energy issues. As a nation, The United States must reduce its dependency on fossil fuels and develop alternatives that are both reliable and environmentally safe.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arctic Wildlife Refuge

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Arctic Wildlife Refuge, in Jimmy Carter's opion " is one of America's last truly great wilderness". The former President uses his personal experiances to show why the Arctic Wildlife Refuge should be left be. Also he enacted legislation to help protect the wilderness from further development, with bipartisen support. Jimmy Carter want this area to be protected from industry destroying the natural beuaty, along with keeping around for future gernations to enjoy.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Has anyone been to Alaska, or will plan a trip to Alaska? Well it’s a land of cold dark weather that doesn’t appeal to most, but Alaska has been a major topic to the government that affects me and you. The Alaska tundra has been in question to drill oil or to protect the precious environment there. Should the Alaska tundra be opened for oil drilling?…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oil Drilling in Alaska

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    George W. Bush was a strong supporter for the drilling in Alaska. His argument for being pro drilling is that it will help our economy. Many new jobs would be created and that America would be less dependent on foreign sources of energy. This will improve America's economy which has took a plunge over the last few years. He also said that with all the studies that ANWR ( Arctic National Wildlife Refuge) has done that scientists have created was of drilling for the oil with having barely any effect on the earth. If this is true that means that most of the people who were opposed to it, because it would destroy wildlife, would be happy. The area that the drilling would be done in makes up only 8 percent of the whole refuge.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One recent autumn evening while I stood in line to comment at a public hearing about a proposed natural gas pipeline through Virginia, I befriended an inspirational environmental advocate by the name of Bear Redstar. Bear grew up in a Lakota family as a part of the Dakotas’ seven Sioux tribes. Bear’s initial exposure to the destructive potential of a pipeline occurred while he worked as a welder for ExxonMobil on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, where he witnessed the steel pipe rupture and release crude oil into the environment. Upon his return home, he advocated alongside Native American community members against the Dakota Access Pipeline. A few months ago Mr. Redstar, moved to Roanoke, Virginia, again facing the trouble of a pipeline. He and I were at the public hearing to warn the Appalachian community of the risks associated with a pipeline.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There’s something about the way trees form a thick canopy over a quiet forest that whispers of barely contained power. The wilderness seems to hold its breath and hide its secrets amidst the incursions of curious humans. However, the lucky few, such as former president Jimmy Carter, are made privy to the innermost workings of Mother Earth’s mysteries through their time in nature. Ink becomes paint, pages become canvases and Carter becomes an artist in his impassioned foreword to, ‘Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey’. In an effort to convince readers the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry, Carter utilizes powerful imagery…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "To drill or not to drill? Should oil companies drill for oil in the remote Alaska…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alaska Oil Drilling

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the era of capitalism and fierce corporate rivalries, the agenda for any major corporation is likely to prioritize profits over social problems such as environmental degradation. An example that sheds light on the conflict between human interests and environmental responsibility is the controversial approval of the oil drilling in the Northern Slope region of Alaska and the drilling that has already began, in the Tar Sands of Alberta. In this paper I will firstly explain the situation regarding why the drilling for oil is up for debate to take place. Secondly I will assess the benefits and the irreparable damage that could possibly bring forth devastating effects towards the eco-system and the wildlife in the area. Finally I will make a personal recommendation on how I feel the situation should be brought to a close using logic and reason towards both our human entailed interests and the natural world. It is important to determine whether the benefits of drilling outweigh the cost and unrectifiable damage that the environment will undergo. The dividing line between rational decisions, which benefit us not only in terms of capital and gain but also in ensuring a flourishing future for our surroundings, should be well drawn and highly regarded. For these reasons, this paper will prove that the drilling should not be approved, as the grave consequences of this project are not outweighed by its benefits.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * State in the United States-international boundary with Canada to the east, arctic ocean to the north…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Although many definitions are available, the “Arctic” is everything North of the 60th parallel of northern latitude. Canada has three territories and several tips of other provinces which total 40% of Canadian landmass that fits the definition of the Arctic. In this landmass, an estimated population of more than 100,000 Canadians call it home. (The Canadian Arctic, 2013) This land and these people have needs and desires that are up to the government to see efficiently managed and regulated. Specialized aspects such as; The Environment, Economic Development, and Security are leading areas of concern. The following report will call attention to relevant government departments, Crown…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the time we live in today we still struggle with the issue of wildlife conservation. Wildlife conservation is important, as animals can not speak for the selves and need us to create a voice for them. Former United States President Jimmy Carter has a strong opinion towards wildlife conservation shown in a foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land. In the foreword by Jimmy Carter, he uses effective rhetorical devices in his argument to persuade his audience that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics