Occupational Safety and Health in the Caribbean
Occupational Safety and Health in the Caribbean lecture notes
Dr. A. Bailey
BBA Unit 1
Course objectives
On completion of this module the student should have mastered the following : * Overview of OHS in LAC * Gender issues * High risk occupations * Common occupational hazards * The impact of OHS in LAC * Main policy issues and challenges * Policy recommendations
People spend more than one-third of each day at work. For this reason alone it should be clear that working conditions can have a major and direct impact on the health and well being of the approximately 210 million workers of Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and their families.
Furthermore, concerns with Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) extend well beyond the obvious health consequences of work-generated illnesses, accidents and death.The World Health Organization estimates that only between 1% and 4% of all occupational diseases are reported in the developing world.Every year more than 2 million people die from occupational accidents or work-related diseases. By conservative estimates, there are 270 million occupational accidents and 160 million cases of occupational disease. The safety of work varies enormously between countries, economic sectors and social groups .
There are 20-27 million work-related accidents in Latin America and the Caribbean annually.. In the Caribbean in particular, there has been a general increase in the number of occupational accidents and diseases reported.The most frequently reported occupational diseases in the Caribbean are pesticide and heavy metal poisoning. Skin, respiratory diseases and occupational hearing loss are also common.
There are currently more than 50 conventions by the ILO that deals with OSH. This is indicative of the concerns raised by Labor of the seriousness of this problem. This issue affects not just workers but also their families, which ultimately affects the economy of the country.
OSH issues are
Dr. A. Bailey
BBA Unit 1
Course objectives
On completion of this module the student should have mastered the following : * Overview of OHS in LAC * Gender issues * High risk occupations * Common occupational hazards * The impact of OHS in LAC * Main policy issues and challenges * Policy recommendations
People spend more than one-third of each day at work. For this reason alone it should be clear that working conditions can have a major and direct impact on the health and well being of the approximately 210 million workers of Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and their families.
Furthermore, concerns with Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) extend well beyond the obvious health consequences of work-generated illnesses, accidents and death.The World Health Organization estimates that only between 1% and 4% of all occupational diseases are reported in the developing world.Every year more than 2 million people die from occupational accidents or work-related diseases. By conservative estimates, there are 270 million occupational accidents and 160 million cases of occupational disease. The safety of work varies enormously between countries, economic sectors and social groups .
There are 20-27 million work-related accidents in Latin America and the Caribbean annually.. In the Caribbean in particular, there has been a general increase in the number of occupational accidents and diseases reported.The most frequently reported occupational diseases in the Caribbean are pesticide and heavy metal poisoning. Skin, respiratory diseases and occupational hearing loss are also common.
There are currently more than 50 conventions by the ILO that deals with OSH. This is indicative of the concerns raised by Labor of the seriousness of this problem. This issue affects not just workers but also their families, which ultimately affects the economy of the country.
OSH issues are
References: 1. Antle, J.M., D.C. Cole, and C.C. Crissman (1998) – “Further evidence on pesticides, productivity and farmer health: Potato production in Ecuador.” Agricultural Economics,18, 199-207. 2. Ashford, N. (1976) – Crisis in the Workplace: Occupational Disease and Injury. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 3 4. Baumol, W.J. and D.F. Bradford. 1970. “Optimal Departures from Marginal Cost Pricing,” American Economic Review, 60(3): 265-283. 5. Camara, V., and G. Corey (1992) – O Casos dos Garimpos de Ouro no Brasil. Pan American Centre for Human Ecology and Health, Serie Epidemilogia y Medio Ambiente. Mexico City: Pan American Health Organization. 6. Diamond, P.A. (1977) – “Insurance Theoretic Aspects of Workers’ Compensation.” In Natural Resources, Uncertainty and General Equilibrium System, A.S. Blinder, and P. Friedman (eds.). New York. Academic Press. 7. Dorman, P. (1996) – Markets and Mortality: Economics, Dangerous Work, and the Value of Human Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 9. Dufor, C., P. Lanoie, and M. Patry (1998) – “Regulation and Productivity.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 9:233-247. 10. Elliott, K.A. and R.B. Freeman (2001) – “Global Labor Standards and Free Trade: The Siamese Twins of the Global Economy.” Mimeo. 11. Frumkin, H. (1999) – “Across the water and down the ladder: occupational health in the global economy.” Occupational Medicine: State of the Art Reviews 14(3):637-663. 14. Heinrich, H., W. Dan Petersen, and N. Roos (1980) – Industrial Accident Prevention: A Safety Management Approach. New York, McGraw-Hill. 15. International Labour Office (1998) – Yearbook of Labour Statistics. Geneva, ILO. 16. Keifer, M., R. McConnell, A.F. Pacheco, W. Daniel, and L. Rosenstock (1996) – “Estimatingunderreported pesticide poisonings in Nicaragua.” American Journal of Industrial Medicine 30(2):195-201. 18. Leigh, J.P., S. Markowitz, M. Fahs, C. Shin, and P. Landrigan (1996) – Costs of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. NIOSH Report U60/CCU902886. Washington DC: National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. 19. Loewenson, R. (1994) – “Small-Scale Industries.” In Occupational Cancer in Developing Countries, N. Pearce, E. Matos, H. Vanio, P. Boffetta, and M. Kogevinas (eds.). IARC Scientific Publications No. 129, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 20. Maskus, K.E., T.J. Rutherford, and S. Selby (1995) – “Implications of Changes in LaborStandards: A Computational Analysis for Mexico.” North American Journal of Economics and Finance 6(2):171-188. 21. Medici, A.C. (1999) – “Novas Perspectivas para o Financiamento da Saúde do Trabalhador no Brasil.” Mimeo. 22. Nelson, R. 1982. “An Empirical Test of the Ramsey Theory and Stigler-Peltzman Theory of Public Utility Pricing,” Economic Inquiry, XX(2): 277-290. 23. Nomiyama, M. (1999) – “New Economic Structures and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Japan.” Paper presented at the XVth World Congress on Occupational Safety and Health, 12-16 April, S. Paulo Brazil. 24. Oi, W.Y. (1974) – “On the Economics of Industrial Safety.” Law and Contemporary Problems 38:669-699. 25. Repetto, R., and S.S. Baliga (1996) – Pesticides and the Immune System: The Public Health Risks. Washington DC: World Resources Institute. 27. Salazar-Xirinachs, J.M. (2000) – “The Trade-Labor Nexus: Developing Countries’ Perspectives.” Journal of International Economic Law 3(2): 377-385. 29. Takala, J. (1999) – “Global Estimates of Fatal Occupational Accidents.” Epidemiology 10(5):640-646. 30. Thaler, R., and S. Rosen (1976) – “The Value of Life Saving.” In Household Production and Consuption,eds. N.E. Terleckyj. New York: NBER Press. 31. Well, D. (1996) – “If OSHA Is So Bad, Why Is Compliance So Good?” RAND Journal of Economics 27:618-640.