Preview

observation of civil proceedings

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3771 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
observation of civil proceedings
Title of issue: ‘Observation of Civil Proceedings’
Name (Student): Arjun Singh
Course: BBA.LLB
P.R.N. No.: 10010224062
Batch: 2010-15

Name of the Court: DISTRICT & SESSION COURT HISAR Date of Observation: 24/02/2015 Case No. I: CS/183/2015
Title of the Case: KALU SINGH v. RAHUL
Stage of the case: Prelimnary Hearing
Appearance made by the parties: Sh. Ram Chandar Kakkar the ld. Defendant counsel appeared for the defendant i.e. Sh. Rahul. The plaintiff didn’t appear.
Proceedings of the case: Next date for filing of the written statement was announced.
Order of the court for that day: Directed the defendant to file written statement on 5/03/2015.
Next date of hearing: 5/03/2015

Name of the Court: DISTRICT& SESSION COURT HISAR Date of Observation: 24/02/2015 Case No. I: CS/73952/2013
Title of the Case: THE SHIVALYA HOUSE BUILDING CO OP SOCIETY LTD. Vs. JAGDISH
Stage of the case: Preliminary Hearing
Appearance made by the parties: Sh. Deshraj Khanna, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff along with Mutwalli of the plaintiff was present as Public Witness 1 (PW1), to be chief examined.
Proceedings of the case: PW1 was asked leading questions by the Ld. Counsel in front of the Defendants counsel.
Order of the court for that day: PW1 statement was recorded and next date for hearing was announced by the court
Next date of hearing: 13/3/2015

Name of the Court: DISTRICT& SESSION COURT HISAR Date of Observation: 29/1/2015 Case No. I: CS/71307/2013
Title of the Case: STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. MUNNI DEVI Stage of the case: Preliminary Hearing
Appearance made by the parties: Sh. Piyush Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Suresh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Proceedings of the case: Counsel for the plaintiff along with Mutwalli of the plaintiff was present as Public Witness 1 (PW1), to be chief examined and to be cross examined by defending counsel.
Order of the court for that day: The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Weintraub Genshlea & Sproul, Rosemary Kelley, Charles L. Post, and William S. Jue, for Plaintiff Nosrat Khajavi.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Court’s scheduling order was dated for March 8, 2004 for the defendant to disclose its expert witness together with the expert disclosures before January 3, 2005. The defendant…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exhibit 16.5 is a final pretrial order for the United States District court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case on the pretrial order is Austin Bennaza vs Buddy Smith. The notice states stipulations and statements that deal with the case. It details each parties current state as well as their part in the case. It states what each party owes the other in dealing with the case. It also states how long the trial should take. It allocates specific time to each task associated with the case. The document needs to be prepared and submitted jointly by opposing trial counsel. The pretrial order also needs to be signed by the pretrial judge.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anna Matero Case

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I attended a pre hearing conference on your behalf in the above-referenced matter before Judge Alade in New Windsor, New York on 05/15/17. The claimant’s widow, Anna Matero was present and was represented by William Cerle.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Justin King Case Study

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, requests that the defendant answer the following Interrogatories fully, under oath and in accordance with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (FRCP), title V, Rule 33.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Parties are called as the plaintiff and defendant when it is the first hearing of a case. In this case it is not an original case but had been appealed. Hence the two parties would be appellant and respondents. In addition, during the appeal case, the party which against previous result will become as appellant and the party which be sued by the appellant will becomes respondent.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    dynamic business law

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Defendant Summary

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The First Defendant, Second Defendant and Third Defendant, collectively as the ‘Defendants’, refer to the 29th of March 2017 statement of claim and say:…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ADJ Midterm

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    was presented, it was a civil case in terms of child custody and a request of trial by jury.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff Vs. Co. V.

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    COMES NOW Plaintiff, MARY MARSDEN, and for her cause of action against Defendant, states to the Court as follows:…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The passage above also discusses one court case. Who were the parties involved in the case?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Oberservation

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, xxxxx Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White. The defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern are seeking a summary judgment which is a procedural device used during civil litigation to promptly and expeditiously resolve a case without a trail. A judge grants summary judgment only if there are no disputes as to the material facts of the case and the party is entitle to judgment as a matter of law. (1) The defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern claim there is no evidence to support that the bartender John Daniels saw any visual signs of intoxication from Edward Hart. This means the defendant isn’t subject to any legal wrong doing. The plaintiff Debbie White is requesting the court to deny the defendants request for summary judgment. The plaintiff claims there is evidence to show the bartender John Daniels saw visual signs that Edward Hart was intoxicated. The plaintiff claims that with the amount of alcohol Edward Hart had consumed in the time he was in the Tavern there would be noticeable visual signs that he was impaired. The plaintiff’s attorney claims there are four (4) factors of actual knowledge of intoxication which would point to visual signs of intoxication. Upon leaving O’Malley’s Tavern Edward Hart crashed his vehicle into the Plaintiffs vehicle causing harm to the Plaintiff and the death of her husband.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People can sue each other for money but can’t put each other in jail, only the state has the right too.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Evidence Hair Evidence

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    University, Cornell. "Expert witness | LII / Legal Information Institute." LII | LII / Legal Information Institute. N.p., 10 Aug. 2010. Web. 22 Aug. 2013. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/expert_witn…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil Jury Trial Report

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Harz, appeared to be a Caucasian female in her late fifties. The plaintiff’s attorney, Michael J. Maggiano, appeared to be a Caucasian male in his sixties. The defendant’s attorney, Louis A. Ruprecht, appeared to be a Caucasian male in his sixties. The plaintiff, Vanessa Russy, is thirty-nine years old and appeared to be a Caucasian female. The defendant appeared to be a Caucasian male in his mid-forties. The plaintiff’s expert witness, Professor Kristin K. Kucsma, appeared to be a Caucasian female in her mid to late forties. The plaintiff’s expert witness appeared to be a Caucasian male in his sixties. Professor Kristin K.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics