Preview

Objectivist vs. Relativist

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
265 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Objectivist vs. Relativist
A relativist is not necessarily more tolerant than and objectivist. This is an implied belief. Taken from page 22 of our textbook, "A problem for both types of relativists lies in the IMPLIED belief that relativitism is a more tolerant position than objectivism" So, according to our book and objectivist is no less tolerant that a relativist. What dictates tolerance is the society in which either person lives. Some societies have tolerance as a dominant value in which case that person, whether relativist or objectivist, is more tolerant than there counter-part, which, for the sake of argument, lives in a society which doesn't hold tolerance as dominant value. As stated by our book, "He or She cannot hold that all people should be tolerant, because tolerance cannot be an objective or transcultural value, according to relativism" This means that not all societies view tolerance in the same light, because each society has a different set of morals beliefs.
An objectivist, unlike a relativist/subjectivist, believes that there is a solid right and wrong, moral and immoral. Because of this, there is a stout disagreement between the two camps. Obviously the relativist believes the exact opposite in which there is no define right and wrong, that it is instead based on cultural values and personal views of the world. The relativist believes that a person dictates their morals based on how they were raised and the environment in which they grew up. The objectivist believes that a person is held by a binding set of morals that is also applied to everyone

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shaw gives an obvious and unconvincing example. He compares abortion in two different societies; it is absolutely wrong in Catholic Spain, but widely accepted in Japan. Most readers would agree that this occurs and abortion is a topic that the world will most likely never come to agreeing terms with. Therefore, relativism is actually significant in each culture. Cultural relativism is complicated in that a whole group of people within an area believe in what they've always been told. Shaw gives an excellent example about slavery in the south. Decades ago, it unfortunately existed and it was acceptable in that time period. However, now it is clearly immoral. A relativist would think that it is acceptable because it was part of the culture. It is not steady to keep changing morals through time. So, who distinguishes right from wrong in that whole society in the first place?…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A moral relativist is someone who views that ethical standard, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore subject to a person’s individual choice. In regards to Pojman beliefs, I do agree that most American students tend to be moral relativists. It is because of the culture that we grew up in. Morality depends on the amount of social acceptance it gets to morally good or bad. For example, he stated that individuals said they were relativists contended in the same polls that abortion is only right if the mother is in danger or that the capital punishment is wrong, but this is not always the case. Given certain circumstance, many individuals will do what he/she feels is morally right. If a mother to be feels the need to abort an unborn child so her life can be easier, she will do so. The attraction of relativism depends on, if an individual feels what they are doing in a certain situation is worth the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Except this example, there are lots of behaviors that are relativistic because they are individually or culturally based. The absolute answer of right or wrong is not set in stone. Therefore, there can’t be objective moral values in the world.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle Essay

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A relativist would react to “What makes you happy might be one thing, but what makes another person happy could be entirely different, so do not impose your lifestyle on other people” by agreeing with the statement about not inflicting your lifestyle on someone else. Relativists believe you cannot urge morality on others. Even if it is someone who you share a primary relationship with, you can not make any judgement on what decisions they make. Relativists do not judge others, so if something very immoral makes you happy, a relativist can not impose on your choice of being immoral. Relativism says that all culture is good and all culture is bad; it’s the same thing as happiness, it can be good or bad but you can not judge a persons happiness whether it is good or bad. Overall, a relativist would never impose on someone’s lifestyle even if something totally different makes them happy, or even if what makes one happy is completely wrong and immoral.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Objective moral truths are truths that exist regardless of an individuals or a group opinion. Subjectivists believe that there are no objective moral truths and that morality is decided by the person. For instance, some objectivists would say that it is an objective moral truth that torturing babies is wrong. While subjectivist believe that it is morally true or morally wrong if one approves or disproves of torturing babies. According to subjectivism, things are either right or wrong according to an individuals attitudes and feelings. Cultural relativism differs from objectivists view on moral truths as it believes also there are no objective moral truths. Cultural relativism believe morality is based on the moral code of a culture. Moral codes…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the concept of relativist morality: Moral relativism is an opposing perspective from the objective ways of a moral absolutist such as Plato , whose moral standards are fixed regardless of the context. The whole concept of absolutism is universal and deontological; therefore it is unchanging. Whereas Moral relativism is teleological: the outcome of the action is not taken into consideration, meaning that moral relativism possesses moral truth that is dependent on place, culture, time and religion. Furthermore it is subjective in a way that our overall conclusion of an ethical situation is based on what we feel is the most suitable moral judgement. Relativism indicates that there is no one true morality, there should not be one solution…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pojman Ethical Relativism

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethical Relativism is the belief that nothing is objectively right or wrong and that the meaning of what is right and wrong depends on the individual and culture. Pojman breaks down Ethical Relativism into 2 main concepts: The Diversity Theory and the Dependency Theory. The Diversity Theory addresses the concept of what is morally right and wrong varies from society to society; therefore, there is no universal moral principles that all societies accept. For example, Homosexuality in the Middle East is a forbidden practice, while in ancient Greek culture, it was said to be a accepted practice. The Dependency Theory says that all moral principles receive their validity from cultural acceptance.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Relativism is what determines whether the action or conduct is right or wrong. This article states how from a moral absolutist standpoint, some things are always right, while some things are always wrong no matter how much one tries to rationalize them. At the same time, this article defines moral relativism as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. What this means is that what you think is morally right, may not be morally right for someone else. Basically relativism replaces the search for absolute truth. Moral relativism and moral absolutism are means of deriving the morality of the character from The Road. They are tools to use to judge the characters actions, if they can be considered morally correct or morally unethical.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Relativism Unfair

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A relativist cannot pass judgement but yet to be true to their name ‘relativist’ they would be practising ‘do not pass judgement’ thus they are preaching to others that they should not do something in order for others to follow relativism. This concludes that relativism is self – refuting because a concept of relativism has been broken in order to follow it. This could be seen as unfair because to put relativist morality into…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural relativism is contradictory when it states that every culture should embrace a policy of tolerance towards other cultures. To begin with, cultural relativism states right and wrong differ from one cultural to another, it does not imply that other cultures have to tolerate that point of view. The fact of the matter is, one culture believes one idea and another may have another idea. These cultures are not going to change their point of view, or remotely agree with the other culture if their views are contradictory. Each culture has its own beliefs, there is no room for tolerance in true cultural relativism.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Personal Ethics Paper

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The relativism aspect of my ethics started with teachings from my parents. My mother taught me always to treat others in the same way I would want them to treat me. Morals become a part of a person as he or she grows to exercise in…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is moral relativism? Relativism is the position that all perspectives are similarly legitimate and the individual figures out what is valid and relative for them. Relativism hypothesizes that fact is distinctive for various individuals, not just that diverse individuals accept diverse things to be valid. While there are relativists in science and arithmetic, moral relativism is the most well-known assortment of relativism. Nearly everybody has heard a relativist trademark: What's ideal for you may not be what's appropriate for me.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I agree that there are positives to Cultural Relativism, but I think that Rachels makes a very fair point especially in regards to the fact that moral progress cannot be achieved. If progress is not possible then the theory cannot stand because cultures die without progress. For example, in some societies, particularly in Africa and the Middle East, female genital mutilation (FGM) is seen as a way to conform to societal ideals of femininity and modesty and is considered a necessity in properly raising a woman. The reality is though that FGM only leads to great harm and pain for the women involved. There is no actual benefit from the practice and the negatives associated with it are far reaching. The practice leads to infertility, pain, infection, and other long-term risks. FGM violates these women’s human rights and all the practice to continue simply because it is a societal norm is detrimental to those parties involved. A Cultural Relativist would simply accept FGM because it is societally acceptable, but to not see the practice as intrinsically wrong and hurtful has lasting impact on the society. Thus Rachels’s points about the shortcoming of Cultural Relativism hold true and Cultural Relativism cannot be defended despite its few…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics