Preview

Objectivism In James Taggart's Atlas Shrugged

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1222 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Objectivism In James Taggart's Atlas Shrugged
A central pillar of Objectivism is the concept of an objective reality characterized by absolutes: What exists exists, and has certain properties, and obeys certain laws. James Taggart, like many of the villains of Atlas Shrugged, refuses to accept these principles.
A world of immutable absolutes is a world not subject to his whims, and this frustrates him endlessly. His first words in the novel, “Don’t bother me,” foreshadow his relentless struggle to deny reality.
Taggart is speaking, in this case, to an employee who approaches him with a pessimistic report about Taggart Transcontinental’s recent failures. That cry of “Don’t bother me” characterizes Taggart’s habitual approach to this and other unpleasant truths. To shield himself from reality,
…show more content…
The moral purpose of a conscious being, as John Galt explains in his radio speech, is its own life; therefore, “all that which is proper to the life of a rational being is good” (927). Because “man’s mind is his basic tool of survival” (926), he must learn and apply his knowledge in order to reshape his environment in service of his life and happiness. To live “by means of achievement” (928) is the only moral path, because the law of cause and effect does not allow human values to be fulfilled through inactivity or failure. Therefore, a person’s worth lies …show more content…
Because he wants to be loved simply for existing, not “for anything I do or have or say or think” (809), he argues that it is intrinsically virtuous to love and praise the undeserving. In Taggart’s ideal world, his incompetence in the physical realm would imply a nobility of spirit; his unhappiness would be the “the hallmark of virtue” (248); and to admire him unconditionally would be a “supreme gesture of charity” (361).
For all his denial of objective reality, however, Taggart is powerless to alter it. Instead, he constructs the facade of his utopia on the backs of producers. Taggart is able to leverage his political skills to achieve personal victories at the expense of others, but depends entirely on the “master[s] of reality” (1048) to provide the loot. He receives an unearned position of power in a company built by his ancestors and operated by his subordinate sister, the Railroad Unification Plan permits him to seize his competitors’ profits, and he even wins his wife’s admiration by taking credit for his sister’s achievements. Yet his parasitic empire is unsustainable. It can persist only so long as there is something to steal, and this is yet another truth that Taggart cannot bear to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Patching Out Virtue, “The first is to champion the virtue tradition against Christian moral quietism and modern deontological ethics. The second is to facilitate reconciliation between Augustinian and Emersonian virtue” (Foster 688).…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although he does not advocate humanistic ethics and principles of free will, he acknowledges their existence among men, claiming, “Every one lays out matters in his own mind how he shall avoid damnation, and flatters himself that he contrives well for himself, and that his schemes will not fail” (Miller 87-89). He recognizes that humans attempt to formulate their own destinies, although…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Objectivism is the belief that certain things, especially moral truths, exist independently of human knowledge or perception of them.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference in methodology of execution between the rich and poor highlights the finality of capitalistic extremism, wherein mankind has been completely dehumanized and is equated to a good which can be harvested for profit, “In the poor parts there’s no money to be made off dying people. Because no one has money except the corporates… There are no contracts there, because there don’t have to be” (220). The willingness to undermine the purpose of government for the acquisition of material wealth serves only to facilitate a self-destructive environment where suboptimal decisions are made for the sake of profit. The ‘profit’ attained is not a reflection of the benefit provided to society by a good or service since the profit is acquired via subterfuge; it instead represents the dangers of free market capitalism wherein those who control the means of production use their power and influence to monopolistically envelop all other sources of power and influence to establish absolute control over the social body. Because present day society exists on the precipice of the calamities present in the novel, Pills and Starships acts as a cautionary tale, hoping to reinforce social…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Chicago’s democracy is a cover for the businessmen that truly administer to the city (Sinclair 232). Jurgis makes more money as a political ‘worker’ than he ever could while toiling in the stockyards, and all he had to do was buy votes for his candidate. However, his earnings do not compare to the political bosses who glean money from public projects or catch early wind of the results of the horse races. "Men are not necessarily evil, but within capitalism immoral behavior is systematically rewarded" (Yoder 14). The novel shows that, despite the claim from the American Dream that one could get anywhere through honest hard work, the only way to advance economically is through deception and graft. The famous rights propagated by the American government are no panacea in the jungle. The law can be bent to the whim of the highest…

    • 2431 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evil and Passage

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "And I guess a man's importance in the world can be measured by the quality and number of his glories. It is a lonely thing but it relates us to the world. It is the mother of all creativeness, and it sets each man separate from all other men." (130)…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay aims to argue the views of two different theorist, Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant, with regards to their views on moral worth of an action. The idea of good and bad creates heated debates among many, but this essay will successfully unravel the layers of Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism and his belief that all our motives are driven by pleasure and pain. While arguing Kant’s opposing argument that moral worth of an act revolves around democratic attitudes, and that moral truths are founded on reasons that is logical to all people. When one breaks down both theories, it occurs that Kant’s theory comes out to be the more sensible one in numerous aspects.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    -“He objects the view of moralist that we should put others happiness ahead of our own” p153…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Choosing what morality is determined by, may be the problem in its own-self. Great men have contemplated where morality really lies, though many of them have took another's work to serve as the guide to strive for their own progression. Through the progression of these studies one can conclude that happiness is a focal point in the works of many great men. It seems to be one of the basis of which humanity uses as their definition of morality.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Book I of the Nicomachean Ethics opens with the observation that, “Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action as well as choice, is held to aim at some good” (1). All human actions have an end, and because “there are many actions” (2), there seems to be a multitude of ends. Although a plenitude of ends exist, “if there is some end of our actions that we wish for on account of itself,” then “clearly this would be the good, that is, the best” (2). Recognizing the universal aim of humanity makes people “like archers in possession of a target” (2); humans who understand their purpose can live unapologetically, always in…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Meat-Free Society

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ethics is a subject that is only present in beings that have achieved a certain level of consciousness. This paper does not focus on the exact level of consciousness that must be achieved, but does assume that humans have reached such a consciousness level. Unlike other animals we do not merely react to situations, but rather have the ability to choose our actions. It is defining the “correct” action that ethics is concerned with. The only reasonable basis for ethics must allow for humanity to prosper. It must guide members of a human society to act in a way that allows for the society to procreate, raise offspring, and produce a surplus of goods in a way that will allow for that society to continue operating. If these minimum criteria are not met then the society in question will cease to exist since the ethical rules in question will not have adequately taken into account the other members of that society. I am not implying moral relativism (as there can…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nietzsche Response Paper

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra, we learn that every one of our actions is influenced by a higher interest or objective, ultimately seeking personal fulfillment. Everything we do has a determined purpose that directs our life into a desired path. Aristotle portrays our actions as ends, and he believes that each end leads to a higher end until reaching a final end, eudaimonia. He believes that the only way to fulfill our life and attain complete happiness in life is to reach eudaimonia. Eudaimonia can only be reached once we have accomplished our personal goals, and practiced enough virtuous acts to develop excellence in character. Aristotle believes that developing virtue is the most important element for a fulfilling life. To be virtuous, we must have knowledge of what we are doing; we must know why it is important to do it; our actions must spring from a characteristic from our soul; and we must practice it with other people.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    His central idea is the dynamic unity of reality, 'All is Becoming', and 'All is Opposites'. This basically means that reality and identity are always changing and that identity contains contradictions because the attributes of a thing change over time.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guiding Statement

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Except for things that go against my conscience, I will do whatever I can to obtain a life that is worth living, because this is the single purpose of my existence.” The seriousness of this guiding statement lets me always think very deeply before taking any action.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kelson's Pure Theory of Law

    • 5020 Words
    • 21 Pages

    4. To find the just norms of human behavior in the nature of man, particularly in his reason.…

    • 5020 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays