In society, human beings are constantly being objectified. Body objectification dehumanizes an individual, hence affecting one’s identity and rights. Fukuyama’s essay helps readers understand the importance of respect in relation to human dignity. On the other hand, Roach focuses on the question of ethics for the purpose of using cadavers in ballistics testing. Both essays bring attention to the issue of body objectification and how it influences an individual. Body objectification strips the identity and rights of an individual until he or she is dead.
Identity is what makes a living individual unique and definable. Body objectification results in human beings becoming stripped of their own identity. This happens when a person objectifies another, he/she treats that individual as an object rather than a person. In order to create an identity, people need to be seen for who they are instead of for what they look like. Roach …show more content…
Objectification makes a human being into an object, which deprives a living human of having human qualities. People are stripped of their identity when they are body objectified because then they are just an individual body part. Identity is who an individual is. Therefore, when one is objectified that individual is no longer living because one is an object. Without being alive, people cannot make an identity for themselves because an identity does not come from physical characteristics, it comes from a person’s internal qualities. Additionally, body objectification violates the rights of people that are alive because then people are not treated fairly and with respect. But when a human being dies, he/she is no longer affected by body objectification because that individual is no longer living. Overall, body objectification has a negative impact on a human being unless he or she is