Preview

Nuremberg Trial Justice

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1130 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuremberg Trial Justice
Nate Murphy
Prof. Levin
Intro to Law and Politics 3200-001
09-30-2013

On the Justice of Law Concerning War Criminals The clarity brought on by the past century’s globalization in both civil and military theatres has partially lifted the fog of war. Intra-state, ethno-culturally centered ongoing conflicts have yielded many of the most prolific cases of human rights violations in history, and thus have presented the world with the enigma of trying and sentencing these criminals without violating the mandates (or norms) that they wish to enforce. Faced with lack of precedent, many courts have seemingly cited laws for the first time only after they have been broken, risking the viability of both the court and distorting law internationally. Furthermore, the trials of the offenders are often little more than post-conflict authoritarian demonstrations of power, with little legal legitimacy. The Nuremberg Trials will be examined as evidence to the assertion that these trials are detrimental to the pre-existing legal system and to the advancement of war criminal law as a whole. The Nuremberg criminals were officially charged on four counts; war crimes, crimes against humanity, crimes against peace, and conspiracy to wage war. These charges are divisible into human and political law, with the first two cited being directed at human atrocities, and the latter duo falling under the political spectrum. All four charges are flawed on their own as well as common ground, starting with their derivatives. Directly contradicting the trial’s convictions against human rights and wartime law is the superior orders theory. German doctrines have been proven to have directly contradicted the international standards of the Hague Convention, allowing civilian abuse if it will further the war’s agenda. The German soldiers and officers were acting under the direct orders of their respective commanders, under penalty of exile or death. A logical course of thought would not lead a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since the end of the World Wars, international criminal tribunals have had a growing role in the prosecution of international crime. In November 1945 the allied powers got together and showed procedural fairness against the Nazi officials. For crimes against humanity, this was the first time this occurred on a global scale. In the…

    • 538 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The law of Habeas Corpus was created to permit the guilty to present their case in court and to be tried fairly. In today 's war on terror, the amount of such enemy combatants who were detained indefinitely without any trial has raised. The courts are split up on following the law by the letter or to practically change it according to the situation 's needs. I feel it 's necessary to follow these laws in the same context in which they were written, and the pragmatic approach leaves room for reckless changes. To deny an enemy combatant his or her day in court cannot be justified as taking the pragmatic approach in dealing with war criminals. This paper is an attempt to present the state of law today towards war criminals and the implications of denying the basic right of Habeas Corpus to suspected terrorists.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Holocaust War Crimes

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to seek justice for these war crimes, many trials were held. The first declaration officially noting the mass murder of Jews, resolving to prosecute those responsible, was noted on December 17, 1942 by the leaders of the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union (War Crimes Trials). The people responsible for the war crimes were to be sent back to the countries where such crimes haf been committed and judged accordingly to the laws of that nation (War Crimes Trials). Justice was the only reasonable solution to this situation. Many nations which Germany occupied during World War 2 or who collaborated with the Germans in the persecution of certain populations, espically Jews, have also held national trials in the years following World War 2 (War Crimes Trials). The goal of the post war trials was to punish all of the people charged with offenses recognized as crimes in Article 2 of the Control Council of Law no 10 (War Crimes Trials). Due to the heinousness of such crimes, it was vital of authorites to go to such extremes. These post war trials really helped bring peace to many of the victims of the crimes.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials

    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages

    More than half a century has passed since the end of World War Two and to this day it is still difficult to fully understand the severity of what was by far the most destructive war in human history. More than sixty million people were killed during World War Two and more than half of those were innocent town’s people. Among the dead were over six million Jews, which was two thirds of the total living race in Europe at the time. Beyond these general statistics were thousands of stories of crimes committed against soldiers and civilians. These crimes against humanity included cases of prisoners of war being murdered, sent to concentration camps and abuse as well as harmless civilians being rounded up and “exterminated” in death camps. At the end of the war, the Allies (USA, France, Britain, and Russia) felt that the Germans had to be held accountable for their inhumane actions and felt justified to punish the Nazis in an international court of law. On November twentieth, 1945 the Nuremberg trials began where twenty one of the top Nazi leaders where being prosecuted for their crimes during the war. All of the Nazi defendants were considered innocent until proven guilty and were allowed to defend themselves against the charges. Some of the defendants such as Alfred Jodl, Wilhelm Keitel and Hans Frank used the defence that they were just following orders. Other defendants like Karl Doenitz and Albert Speer admitted their actions were wrong. Herman Goering believed his actions were for the greater good of Germany. After researching and gaining the knowledge of the Nuremberg Trials I believe that all six of these Nazi leaders are guilty and I think the judges decided on appropriate sentences for each of the accused. All six of these men helped lead the Germans to commit some of the most brutal crimes the world has ever seen and each of them had to face the consequences of their actions.…

    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of the 185 defendants of the Nuremberg Trials, 12 received a death sentence, 8 received life prison, and 77 received prison terms varying in numbers. Some had committed suicide before they could be executed. These executions caused the United Nations to create certain documents trying to keep world peace. For example, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was created. Following World War II, the Nuremberg Trials impacted the world then and in the future in many ways. To begin, the Nuremberg Trials were a series of trials prosecuting and questioning Nazi war criminals. Next, the results of the trials were 7 more trials held for less important Nazi war criminals. Lastly, there were many Nazi war criminals still to be found.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To begin with, it can be used as an example for future similar trials for war crimes. During the trials, a great number of men were executed, arrested, and banished. For example, for other genocides like the Rwanda genocide, the actions that were made during the Nuremburg Trials could act as a baseline for how trials should be held. As proven, the Nuremburg Trials can help by outlining what needs to be done in future trials. Furthermore, after seeing how Germany ended up after the genocide, it could encourage other political leaders to be more careful with their decisions. For example, Stephen Harper realized how wrong the Aboriginal residential schools were, so he publicly apologized for its inhumanity. As shown, the consequences of the Jewish genocide may help prevent anymore crimes against peace in this world. Although Jewish people looked at these trials as a form of justice, it left Germans with a different point of…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials were a series of war trials against the Nazis for their crimes committed during the war. In reference to the article provided, only twenty-two war criminals were tried, to begin with, and after only fifteen were given serious punishments on the count of their respective charges, twelve given the death sentence, and three lifelong sentences in prison. The other seven were either acquitted or given ten to twenty years in prison. The results and the consequences of these trials do not nearly equate to the six million deaths of Jews and other victims in the Holocaust. Although these trials showed the power of obeying judicial laws in worldly events, hundreds of thousands of perpetrators got away with crimes, and this in no way fully shows justification for the Jewish…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuremberg Trials

    • 2619 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Twenty-four major political and military leaders of Nazi Germany, indicted for aggressive war, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Of the twenty-four twenty-one were taken into custody and put on trial; these were known as the Nuremberg Trials. These trials started on November 20th 1945 and were the first ever war crime tribunal. The Trials were held by the Allied forces of World War II and were held in the city of Nuremberg in Bavaria Germany out of the Palace of Justice. Accusations placed against them were for their involvement in the Nazi Party during World War II. Nazi officials were judged unfairly during the Nuremburg Trails for a continent wide genocide that occurred within WWII and the world watched as Nazi officials got what they deserved.…

    • 2619 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Reason for trials: seen as important to make the Germans realise the scale of destruction that had occurred, the atrocities committed by the Germans were part of official government policy, the idea that if it was shown that this behaviour would not go unpunished then such evil would not be repeated and the hope that International Justice would be a good sign for the future of the United…

    • 3933 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1933, less than 1% of the German population was Jewish. Jews contributed significantly to German culture. Many served in World War I and thought of themselves as Germans first and Jews second. They considered Germany a home; their passionate ties and the blind loyalty to Germany caused them to be blind to the harsh reality of anti-Semitic measures. The Nuremberg Laws were the first attempt by the Nazi government to define the Jews and as such. The first law, The Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor, prohibited marriages and extra-marital intercourse between “Jews” (the name was now officially used in place of “non-Aryans”) and “Germans” and also the employment of “German” females under forty-five in Jewish households.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials is the general name for two sets of trials of Nazis involved in crimes committed during the Holocaust of World War II. The first, and most famous, began on November 20, 1945. It was entitled the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, which tried the most important leaders of Nazi Germany. The second set of trials, for lesser war criminals, was conducted under Control Council Law No. 10, at the U.S. Nuremberg Military Tribunals.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Geneva Conventions are a series of treaties… on the treatment of civilians, prisoners of war and soldiers, who are otherwise rendered out of the fight, or incapable of fighting (“Geneva Conventions”). Allied soldiers…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This course prevented later accusations that the defendants had been condemned without evidence since criminal proceeding would require documentation of the criminal charges against them. Not only would military officers be held to a trial, but civilian officials would be held responsible for their acts as well. With the trial, however, there came many difficulties. First of all, existing international law provided no means for prosecuting war criminals. There had been cases of war criminal trials in the United States but that had operated under only one country, there being several countries on trial created friction.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A series of trials, called the Nuremberg Trials, were then held where various Nazi officials were tried for their war crimes. These trials were treated carefully and diplomatically as they…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The London Charter in 1945 saw the Allies again meet to decide the proceedings for the subsequent war crimes trials including the hastily approaching British trial at Belsen and the Nuremberg Trial in November of 1945. The charter laid out the three categories of crimes that individuals could be tried for; Crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. As Justice Lawrence, the British representative at the Nuremberg Trial, saw it, the charter ‘laid down that aggressive war was a crime, that breaches of the law were crimes and that crimes against humanity committed in connection with an aggressive war was a crime.’ The three categories of crime and the agreement on the proceedings of such trials aimed to correct the mistakes of trials in World War One, where the trials were handed over to Germany who acquitted criminals or gave more lenient sentences, and aimed to create a new system for future war crimes trials. The charter however was not brought about without problems. Discussions over the methods and procedures were widely publicised in the press; there was a large debate surrounding the use of the ‘Anglo-American’ legal system or the ‘continental’ procedures. In The Times, the day after the Allied Declaration in London on the 8th August 1945, on page eight, the respondent raises the issue of mutual concession; ‘of course one price to pay of such international…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays