Preview

Nuclear Proliferation and Its Negative Effects

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Proliferation and Its Negative Effects
Nuclear Proliferation Affecting The World in a Negative Way

For the past thirty years, Iran and North Korea have been trying to develop and design a nuclear warhead, nowadays; American spies say that Iran has built a Uranium enrichment plant on Qum. Uranium enrichment is the hardest step in order to produce nuclear weapon, and North Korea has already tested nuclear weapons the past years. This is a way to prove that nuclear proliferation keeps increasing in the world and this could balance the world power in a negative way. If states that are directly against each other keep increasing their nuclear arsenal, the world could be ruled or at least influenced by an unstable military power determined by actions made with nuclear weapons. By now, only the strongest military and economic nations possess nuclear warheads and these countries maintain good political and democratic relations between each others except India and Pakistan. The fact that only this nations own nuclear weapons keep the world safe because they know that they will not use those weapons, however many nations such us Iran North Korea and Libya have been trying to obtain one for the past years. No matter what the U.N does, proliferation keeps increasing and new nations try to obtain nuclear warheads, in addition, the more nuclear bombs are in the world the easiest is to trade them among terrorist, in the past years several terrorist groups have been involved in trading nuclear arms in the black market. This is why if Nations Like Iran, North Korea And Libya continue to try to produce nuclear energy to use it as bombs warheads the world’s security can became unstable, because “Only if we abolish nuclear weapons and permanently halt the nuclear power industry we can hope to survive,” and like this avoid terrorist bands which are one of the world’s biggest security concern to acquire nuclear arms from the black market.
After the after the United States of America entered the Second World war on



Bibliography: French W. Howard, http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/08/world/us-envoy-angers- north-korea.html?scp=1&sq=bush+accuses+north+korea&st=nyt , Tuesday, October 8 Thomas. J Colin, http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Focus/cqr_proliferation.pdf, CQ press. 2, April 2004. Braziller, George, Arms Control, Disarmament, and National Security: Edited by Donald G. Brennan 1961 Bentley, Judith. The nuclear Freeze Movement: Franklin Watts New York 1984. Sanger E. David and William J. Broad, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/world/middleeast/01iran.html?_r=1&scp=6&sq=iran&st=cse

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scare

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In addition to the reduction in weapons, the number of countries which were developing, had developed or were seriously discussing nuclear programs has dropped since the 1980’s. This was due to a combination of factors that still determine such decisions today, including security, expense, need for status or prestige, internal politics and other factors.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A nuclear weapon is a weapon that gets it’s destructive power by turning matter into energy. All nuclear weapons are explosives(usually missiles).They can be transported by missiles, bombs,tank shells,mines, or torpedoes. The most destructive nuclear weapons are far more poweful than any conventional(non nuclear) weapon. A nuclear weapon used in a large city could kill millions of people. A large nuclear war could devastate the Earth’s climate and ability to support life(a.k.a nuclear winter).…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1 Draft Memorandum From Secretary of Defense McNamara to President Kennedy. September 23, 1961. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963 Volume VIII, National Security Policy, Document 46.…

    • 3913 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people wonder about the future of the world as more powerful nuclear weapons are developed. The U.S. should learn from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and discontinue the development and production of nuclear weapons because the bombs will create unforeseen damage, prompt other countries to produce…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pro nuclear war

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Everyone in the world is threatened by the existence of nuclear weapons. Has anyone the right to wield such destructive power?” (Morality of Nuclear Deterrent) Many people in the United States disagree on whether the United States should keep nuclear weapons. Mainly because of the moral factor. Yes, it is dangerous for countries to own such a powerful figure that threatens millions of people around the world, but the world is trapped by this idea of possible idea of nuclear war that just about every country has on these weapons of mass destruction and will continue to make more to show dominance over the other countries who don’t have as much. The moral factor that is sure to be constantly brought up by many people about keeping our nuclear weapons will always be discussed since the greater damage these weapons cause. For example, when the United Stated bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yes it was tactically right decision and prevented imperialism from expanding, and preventing the cause of japan gaining complete dominance over the world had to be overlooked when coming into the moral play off of the all the people who were affected by this disaster to their country. These cities where quite larger, but not to big so there…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence does exist that terrorist cells, such as Al-Qaeda, is constantly pursuing a nuclear capability. Whether that capability is acquisition or production is not necessarily certain, but the sources, as shown by the mishandling of HEU in some countries, are out there. Potential sources of nuclear weapons, like Russia and Pakistan, also present a concern due to their ample supply of tactical nuclear weapons which, by comparison of high yield bombs, have low security measures (Oppenheimer 2005,…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power can be beneficial or not depends on how people use it. Nuclear power can be a solution for the energy crisis. Moreover, the use of nuclear power wisely with full responsibility can increase the prosperity and standard of living. Government has to create opened relationship with citizen about the using of nuclear power. We have to remember that each of accident radiation happen because of human errors so that it needs controlling tightly.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specific Purpose: To persuade the audience that the use of Nuclear Weapons or WMD (weapons of mass destruction), should be eradicated for the safety and preservation of humanity and the world…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, stated in one of his speeches that “Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury,”. This bellicose statement is extremely significant and one that should not be dismissed or ignored. America is quite open with the fact that it recognizes Israel as a country and looks upon Israel as its biggest ally in the Middle East . America clearly fits into the category of one of the countries that in Mahmoud Ahmadinejad words, “will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation”. Many believe the concept of Iran destroying America and Israel is farfetched and impossible. However as each day passes Iran gets closer to having the nuclear power to achieve this “impossible idea”. Iran claims that their nuclear program is not to be used to make nuclear weapons. However America and many other countries cannot trust that claim and do nothing while Iran develops its nuclear capabilities. Iran’s nuclear program must be stopped immediately to insure the security of America , Israel and many other countries. We cannot remain complacent and believe the words of a man who has often proclaimed that he would be happy to see the demise of an entire country and its inhabitants. A man that openly denies the Holocaust on national television, and once stated that “ Iran can recruit hundreds of suicide bombers a day. Suicide is an invincible weapon, Suicide bombers in this land showed us the way and they enlighten our future”. How can we believe a man who supports suicide bombers who give up there their own lives to kill innocent men women and children ? Ahmadinejad’s reference to “suicide bombers in this land” alludes to the Iran-Iraq war in which thousands of young Iranians were used a human weapons. In his article “Suicide bombing as Worship: Dimensions of Jihad” author Denis McEoin writes that:“It was a real-life…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Nuclear Iran

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A variety of arguments against Iran owning nuclear weaponry has been voiced. One of the leading arguments is the fear of nuclear hyper-proliferation. Iran is a relatively powerful nation whose footstep is felt and is very engaged in international affairs concerning its part of the globe. The fear of hyper-proliferation is that once Iran officially has proprietorship of nuclear war devices the surrounding countries and nations of the Middle East will commence an arms race. This would be terrible for a multitude of reasons, the first being that certain countries in the region have shown to be extremely unstable. With radical revolutions still fresh in the blood of its populace Egypt and Syria are perfect examples of countries that do not possess a stable form of government. Nuclear weapons in such states pose an extreme…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the US atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki one of the foremost global concerns has been the peaceful use and control over atomic energy and nuclear power. When the US dropped nuclear bombs on Japan in 1945 approximately 70,000–80,000 people were killed immediately and another 70,000 were injured. These two atomic bombings resulted in calling global attention to the misuse of atomic energy and as a result, denuclearization and non-nuclear proliferation eventually gained importance in world politics. Ultimately we have seen the emergence of the concept of global governance. Since the beginning of the Cold War, “global governance” (GG) has played a major role in world politics and GG is particularly important in the new millennium as the world faces threats to global security, pandemics, and a growing oil crisis. Consequently, new actors have been created to deal with growing global problems, such as transnational organizations, and international government organizations (IGOs). Many of these organizations have proved effective in resolving global matters but on occasion they have failed to do so. Three important international relation theories have helped GG theorists obtain better insight on the term global governance by initiating different approaches towards the subject. These IR theories have conducted distinct analytical methods in managing global problems such as environmental issues, financial crises or global health issues. For the purpose of using nuclear/atomic energy for peaceful causes and non military motives the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was established in 1957 within the United Nations family. The IAEA has been a significant example of global governance and as of December 2009 it had 151 Member States. The organization was designed to create confidence about peaceful nuclear activities within member nation-states that had already acquired nuclear weapons and to reduce the proliferation of nuclear weapons in non-nuclear…

    • 2227 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A nuclear explosion is caused by the release of energy in an atom, either through fission or fusion. Fission weapons cause an explosion by the splitting of atomic nuclei. This happens when a neutron collides with the nucleus of an atom. The protons in the nucleus are transformed into a great amount of energy and two or three more neutrons are sent out, which go on to split other nuclei. If this continues, a chain reaction will occur. The result is a gigantic explosion. To form a chain reaction, a certain amount of material is needed. This amount is known as the critical mass. If the amount is too small it is called a subcritical mass. The critical mass of a material depends on its purity. The materials used in making fission weapons are uranium and plutonium. They are the only elements able to be used in making a fission weapon.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear World

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If a nuclear bomb was dropped on your city, how would you survive? The blast from the fission bomb on Hiroshima, which weighed 30 kilotons, was equivalent to 12,500 tons of TNT. Now, if this was dropped right outside your house, there would be no way of survival. But, one megaton hydrogen bomb is said to have 80 times the explosive intensity of the fission bomb detonated in 1945. The destructive force of the hydrogen bomb is near unimaginable.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays