Preview

Nonviolent Resistance: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
530 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nonviolent Resistance: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Martin Luther King Jr. believed in also practiced nonviolent resistance because he understood that was the way of life. In the 1966’s that year initiated the first public encounter to the philosophy and approach of nonviolence within the civil right movement. During the deadly racist violence against the nonviolent workers embraced Dr. King’s commitment to nonviolence as a total way of life and inviable ideologies. Many of activists were willing to use peaceful protest and there were the fearful men who would not join the nonviolent movement because they would not remain nonviolent if attacked. He mentions violence is a strategy for social change in American is “nonexistent” and all of the daring talk and wrath produces no action and signifies …show more content…
However, they also had their difference for example Dr. King was integrationist and a perpetual advocate of nonviolence resistance; as oppose to Malcom where he believed that integration would destroy black and white man. Malcolm X indicated “the time for you and me to allow ourselves to be brutalized nonviolently is passé”, being nonviolently was outdated since they had been through brutal violence for over decades. Malcolm X’s certainty within violence was to be nonviolent only with those are nonviolent to you. What Malcolm X meant by Black Nationalism is that all of the revolution that had taken place before like the American Revolution and French revolution were all white nationalism; and therefore all the revolutions that are going on in Asia and Africa are based on-Black Nationalism. He learned that people from Asia and Africa are not white in fact different, which dominates and strengthens the Black Nationalism. His global travels showed Malcolm X about the basic need for global resistance carrying out together domestic struggles for African American for equal rights with the freedom struggles of Third World

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Because of the life that Malcolm X and Martin Luther King lived was responsible for the distinct different responses to American racism. Both men were important to the African-American culture and had a great influence on black Americans. However, King had a more positive attitude than Malcolm X. He believed that through peaceful demonstrations and arguments blacks were able to someday achieve full equality with whites. Because Malcolm X’s life was based on angry belief he thought that equality was impossible because whites had evil. King basically adopted on a more peacefull philosophy that thought that blacks and whites should be united and live together in peace, but Malcolm X promoted nationalist and separatist doctrines. For most of his life, he believed that only through revolution and force blacks and white wuld be equal and live in a better inviorment.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. was the acknowledged leader of the American Civil Rights Movement. King earned several degrees and was a bright man. His “Letter from Birmingham Jail” was written in April 1963, while he was in jail in Birmingham, Alabama, for acts of civil disobedience (499). His letter is a response to a letter signed by clergyman criticizing his actions towards civil rights. The clergymen believed that his actions were “untimely.” King states ,”if I sought to answer all the criticisms that cross my desk…I would have no time for constructive work” (500). He usually does not respond to letter that criticize his work and actions, but he believed the clergymen were men of genuine good and they meant no harm. King was president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and they had affiliates all throughout the South. King believed he was supposed to spread freedom. He agreed that if Birmingham ever needed him that he would be there. “Injustice everywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (500). King used an approach to resolve issues in nonviolent manners. It consisted of sit-ins, marches, and etc. Nonviolent direct action would create a tension that an otherwise ignored subject would have to be faced. With nonviolent direct action and ignored issue would come to light and can no longer be ignored(502). After the direct-action program, King hoped that the doors to negotiation would open.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What I believe King is trying to say in this article is that violence will get you nowhere in life. We feel like we have fight or get aggressive to get our points across to people. Violence will put us in the same spot we are already in. Nonviolent resistance is the best thing to do because there is no fighting involved. Martin Luther king Jr. states, “Through nonviolent resistance the Negros will be able to rise to the noble heights of opposing the unjust system while loving the perpetrators of the system” (79 King)That just means, that we should fight with the unjust system and still love the enemy.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Malcolm x and Martin Luther King Jr. are both powerful leaders. Malcolm X believed in violence and Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence. These two leader shared belief and hopes but they also had their differences. Malcolm X was born in Omaha, Nebraska on May 19, 1925. Malcolm did not believe in nonviolence or advocate integration. (Harold 610) He attracted black people’s attention and was eloquent, passionate, and a courageously out spoken champion of black people and a critic of American racism.…

    • 562 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Dr. King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” he shows that nonviolence is the way to get the positive attention that his plight deserved. He believed that to use violence was negative on a couple of points. First, violence always gets negative attention. Second, violence was the way the Klu Klux Klan went about their business. He wanted to expose unjust laws and do it in a fashion that conveyed his beliefs without causing other problems. In Dr. King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” he is trying to convince his “fellow clergymen” (566) that his fight for the civil liberties is a just one, and that the march was a nonviolent one and one that was surely needed. Dr. King stated, “we are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny” (566). King is saying that it’s something that can no longer be ignored, that he can no longer sit on the sideline and be an idle observer. The black man has to take it to the streets. In this letter, Dr. King showed that nonviolence, direct action, and the ability to stand by one’s convictions are the right path.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To overcome oppression, Martin Luther King Jr. pursued it with nonviolence, while Malcolm X, believed the only way to achieve freedom was though violence. Both men believed it was imperative that something be done, however their ideas of obtaining freedom were polar opposites. Martin Luther King Jr. always made it a point to argue how violence is immoral and through the use of a number of biblical references to reach his audience he made sure everyone could understand. Malcolm X’s opinion was centered mostly on pointing fingers, blaming someone and Black Nationalism. The contrasted views of these men, alludes to a divided community, either supportive of a peaceful solution or ready to bare arms against the white man to reach integration.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King, Jr. wanted a more peaceful approach. He hoped that with sit-ins and peace marches to appeal to the ideals of dignity and justice in the white people of the time. To show them the wrong they were doing so that they would want to correct it in themselves out of their own personal honor. Malcolm X on the other hand believed that white people would never give up their power, at least early on in his career as a civil rights leader. He believed they would only give it up if forced to do so, and that meant through militant means. He eventually give this idea up in favor of more peaceful means after finding white Muslims who treated him and other black men as brothers; and black men who treated white people as brothers as well. And with this he began to realize that they could live in peace, and so he switched to a more peaceful style in his protests in the…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr’s approach to civil rights was nonviolent civil disobedience protests. This meant that when they marched on Birmingham they let the police beat, release dogs on them, spray them with fire hoses and didn’t fight back. They just kept peacefully assembling and marching for their rights. He knew that if the northern media would cover the abuses they faced that it would end segregation in the south. So the march on Birmingham happened, and in front of cameras the children and young people marching through Birmingham Alabama having their rights violently violated went all around the world.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Martin Luther King’s peaceful protests against narrow minded white supremacists helped him rise to national fame, Malcolm X, born Malcolm Little, lectured the United States about Islam and urged others to dismiss all whites as their enemies and arm themselves for war. Each discussed the same issues, but their methods of achievement and ideas about equal opportunity differed as much as night and day. Although both greatly influential civil rights activists, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. had some very significant differences in their backgrounds and methods of delivery in their messages of equality.…

    • 975 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malcolm X & Mlk

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout their lives, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were role models in the continuous battle against racism. They both gave powerful speeches on racism; however their intentions were delivered with different styles and purposes. King had a more positive and idealistic approach compared to Malcolm X's more pessimistic views. King was hopeful in believing that someday blacks would achieve full equality with whites. Non–violent demonstrations and arguments were King's techniques in reaching equality. Malcolm X on the other hand viewed non-violence and integration as a way of the whites keeping the blacks in their places. Malcolm X showed more fury towards white racism and encouraged more protest against white racists than King did. Although Malcolm X is more of an extremist, both men ultimately wanted respect for one's culture and history.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Luther King, Jr. came to national prominence in 1955 as the leader of a boycott of the city-owned bus line in protest of its discrimination against African-American riders. From this time on, until he was murdered in 1968, Dr. King remained the most prominent African-American civil rights leader. King’s leadership of demonstrations and open defiance of racist laws led police to arrest him a number of times. While in the Birmingham, Alabama, jail in the spring of 1963, King wrote an eloquent defense of his belief in nonviolent resistance. This excerpt comes from that essay:…

    • 2979 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Jr Non Violence

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the article, Martin Luther King Jr.’s Last March, by National Archives, and the excerpts from his famous speech, “I have been to the mountain top”, it shows that he pushed for non violent changes because he spoke with leaders of the opposing sides, gave a famous speech, and stated that it is either nonviolence or nonexistence. The thought of violence disturbed Martin Luther King Jr., and made him very tired and weary. He made many attempts throughout his life to stop the violence because he believed if the violence continued, there would be nothing left.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr help to change a part of the world by practicing non-violent protest. King want to make an impact on the problem of segregation so he tried to protest in one of the most segregated place in the United States. So he went to Birmingham, Alabama to lead a nonviolent protest( Martin Luther King Jr). He also joined other civil rights leaders to walk an historical march called March to Washington. Near the Lincoln Memorial King made a speech called “ I Had a Dream Speech” which said all men of different race will become brothers someday. King fellow minister Ralph Abernathy, and Alabama’s state chairman of the NAACP called a public meeting to order. King said to African Americans to bus boycott until they end segregated seating.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    King did many things to bring people together through peace. When Rosa Parks was arrested, he did a peaceful boycott to protest the colour laws on the bus. That boycott lasted for 382 days, and almost the entire African americans refused to ride the buses. Even when they were doing a peaceful protest and they children and adults were being blasted with water and then them being arrested, they did not result to violence. The start of the Civil right movement was at the March on Washington on where 250,000 people marched to the Lincoln Memorial where Martin Luther King gave his famous “I have a Dream” speech. In the crowd at the March on Washington, they had undercover marshalls in the crowd to keep the peace, but “the marchers chose peace that sunny Wednessday” (www.history.com Civil Rights Movement). If they hadn’t chosen peace like Malcolm X did, and then the problem would have just gotten worse. The marches and protests were important stepping stones to pass the civil rights. So Martin Luther King brought many people together through his many boycotts, marches, and peaceful protests. They peacefully protested against the political and social injustice. He started his nonviolent protests by the teachings of Ghandi. Martin Luther said after a visit about nonviolence “I am more convinced than ever before that the method of nonviolent resistance is the most potent weapon available to oppressed people in their struggle for justice and human dignity.” (Crash Course…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King, Jr. was perhaps one of the most influential person of our time. As the father of modern civil rights movement, Dr.Martin Luther king, Jr., is recognized around the world as a symbol of freedom and peace. Born January 15, 1929, King was the son of an Atlanta pastor. King accomplished many achievements during his life. He graduated from Morehouse as a minister in 1948 and went on to Crozer Theological seminary in Chester, Pa., where he earned a divinity degree. After that King went on to earn a doctorate in theology from Boston University in 1955. King also achieved the Nobel Peace Prize in December of 1964. He was assassinated on April 4,1968, outside his motel room by James Earl Ray. While his views at the time seemed radical to many, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is remembered and respected today as a martyr of the civil rights movement and an icon of change through nonviolent means.<br><br>"The Ways of Meeting Oppression", by Martin Luther King Jr., is a story about the ways in which oppressed people deal with their oppression. Dr. King came up with 3 characteristics in which oppressed people deal with their oppression. In this essay we will discuss the three major ways that Dr. King talks about. We will also reveal the one method that King supports.<br><br>He first characteristic that King mentions in his writing is acquiescence. In this characteristic, King explains how people give up to oppression and become accustomed to it. He believes that this form is not the way to solve the grief that the Negroes were being put through. In fact, he criticizes the people who utilize this method. The following line proves my statement, "To accept passively an unjust system is to cooperate with that system; thereby the oppressed become as evil as the oppressor." <br><br>The second form that Dr. King talks about is hatred and violence. This is another method that he disagrees with. King explains how violence only creates temporary results and creates more…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays