Nomination Process
Prior to delving into the specifics, it is integral to note that a momentous component of the current nomination process in the United States entails the national party convention, in which delegates nominate the party’s presidential and vice-presidential candidates alike. In further elaboration upon this particular reality, the general public evaluates its stance towards potential party nominees for the presidency via caucuses and presidential primaries: a reality that indisputably reflects upon democratic ideals. Considering the intricate nuances of the current nomination process, Americans are able to exhibit their standpoints, pertaining to their preferable presidential nominees. In order to further elucidate upon this particular topic-of-interest,
…show more content…
The rendered information above indisputably captures the essence of democracy as the general public (either directly voting for candidates or indirectly through delegates) is rendered the ability of openly conveying its outright positions. Such a privilege marks a blatantly obvious upgrade over the previous American political system, involving bosses’ outright domination over national party conventions. Generally-speaking, a momentous factor that markedly undermines the current nomination process is directly intertwined to the deluge of funds that is required, in order to run an effective campaign. In further elaboration upon this particular reality, the current nomination process essentially discriminates against those laden with leadership-oriented prowesses but devoid of monetary funds: a rather undemocratic circumstance. This is, of course, not to mention the fact that the current nomination process demands a great deal of time and dedication from its candidates: a reality that is furthermore complemented by the sensations of stress that additionally …show more content…
This, in turn, renders noteworthy insight, as to how a “democratic” representation of the general public’s bona fide desires is nearly impossible to muster, subsequently undermining democratic ideals. The exorbitant amount of attention rendered to the early primaries and caucuses, along with the media’s nearly tyrannical rule over the current nomination process, are commonly cited as potential disadvantages, as
The rendered information above indisputably captures the essence of democracy as the general public (either directly voting for candidates or indirectly through delegates) is rendered the ability of openly conveying its outright positions. Such a privilege marks a blatantly obvious upgrade over the previous American political system, involving bosses’ outright domination over national party conventions. Generally-speaking, a momentous factor that markedly undermines the current nomination process is directly intertwined to the deluge of funds that is required, in order to run an effective campaign. In further elaboration upon this particular reality, the current nomination process essentially discriminates against those laden with leadership-oriented prowesses but devoid of monetary funds: a rather undemocratic circumstance. This is, of course, not to mention the fact that the current nomination process demands a great deal of time and dedication from its candidates: a reality that is furthermore complemented by the sensations of stress that additionally …show more content…
This, in turn, renders noteworthy insight, as to how a “democratic” representation of the general public’s bona fide desires is nearly impossible to muster, subsequently undermining democratic ideals. The exorbitant amount of attention rendered to the early primaries and caucuses, along with the media’s nearly tyrannical rule over the current nomination process, are commonly cited as potential disadvantages, as