No-Kill Shelter Essay
No-Kill Shelters During a crisis of pet overpopulation, it right to kill animals simply because they are not wanted? Or is it ever right thing to do? The United States is faced with the problem of what should be done with the excess of stray animals. This is a complex thing to solve, but that doesn’t mean killing the animals for space is right. Stray dogs and cats have just as much right to a good home as pets that already have owners. No-Kill shelters are beneficial, they provide a safe, pet-friendly environment that would help solve the problems of pet homelessness and overpopulations, as a result of spay and neuter being provided as well. For a no-kill shelter to work, it requires the cooperation of multiple staff members and part-time volunteers, also including local rescues, pet owners and vets. Although, there are two different kinds of shelters. A municipal shelter is run by a city, country, or other public place and is funded by taxpayer dollars. Such shelters are staffed by civil volunteers who may or may not have any experience working with animals. According to one source, “The shelters fall under the governmental departments such as streets and sanitation, road maintenance. Their primary job as defined in municipal codes, is to pick up stray and nuisance animals and reunite lost animals with their owners” (Fasseas). That are just on the street, but they do say they are a private shelter, just not the way you are thinking of. In a model of a No Kill community, all private shelters manage their admissions much like human services do. They take in only as may pets they can care for with their entire donor dollars are going to be saving, not ending lives. According to one source, “In reality, every intuition has a capacity limit. If a hospital or domestic violence shelter has only 1,000 beds, they will not take in 2,000 people and kill the excess” (Moore). A No Kill shelter takes in pets to the crisis care and the worst cases first. When a family gives