Preview

No Child Left Behind Thesis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8358 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
No Child Left Behind Thesis
No Child Left Behind 1

Running head: NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND

The Impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on the K-8 Setting

Kara Robertson

A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment

of the requirements for graduation

in the Honors Program

Liberty University

Fall 2009

No Child Left Behind 2

Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis

This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial

fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the

Honors Program of Liberty University.

______________________________

Shanté Moore-Austin, Ph.D.

Thesis Chair

______________________________

Janice DeLong, M.Ed.

Committee Member

______________________________

Connie McDonald, Ph.D.

Committee Member

______________________________

James Nutter, D.A.

Honors Director

______________________________

Date

No Child Left Behind 3

Abstract

The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), which was implemented in 2002, is changing the classroom for teachers and students. The legislation is widely discussed across the nation and people are deciding whether or not this change is suitable for education. The No Child Left Behind Act is affecting the core subjects in the classroom. After evaluating literature on the subject, it is obvious that there are two clear sides to this legislation. There are also actions that can be taken by teachers within the classroom to best utilize NCLB. As a future educator, it is important to evaluate NCLB and all it entails as it places a large amount of pressure on teachers and students across America. The purpose of this thesis is to evaluate NCLB and its effect on the K-8 classroom setting specifically in regards to the core subject areas.

No Child Left Behind 4

The Impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on the K-8 Setting

Introduction

Many individuals can recall the K-8 setting as an avenue for teachers to teach with creativity and as an avenue where one’s love for the children



References: Abernathy, S.F. (2007). No child left behind and the public schools. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Azzam, A. M., Perkins-Gough, D., & Thiers, N. (2006, November). The impact of NCLB. Educational Leadership, 64(3), 94-96. Retrieved September 20, 2008 from Academic Search Premier database. Bunting, C. (2007, January). Teachers get personal about teaching to survive NCLB. Education Digest, 72(5), 12-15. Retrieved October 13, 2009 from Academic Search Complete database. Finn, C. E. (2007, October 5). Dumbing education down. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119154392619949671.html#printMode. Flake, M., Benefield, T., Schwartz, S., Bassett, R., Archer, B., Etter, F., et al. (2006, November). A firsthand look at NCLB. Educational Leadership, 64(3), 48-52. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from Academic Search Complete database. Flinders, D. J. (2005). The failings of NCLB. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 7(1/2), 1-9. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from Academic Search Premier database. Granowsky, A. (2008, October 9-10). No child left behind: A tale of unintended consequences. Paper presented at the LDA Texas Annual State Conference, Austin, TX. Janesick, V.J. (2001). The assessment debate. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. Manos, M.A. (2009) Opt to take an active role in your child’s education. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 89(1), 22-23. Retrieved October 5, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database. Martin, D.J. (Ed.). (2004). Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. Mundry, S. (2006). No child left behind: Implications for science education. Teaching Science in the 21st Century (pp. 243-255). National Science Teachers Association. http://search.ebscohost.com. Nichols, S. L. & Berliner, D.C. (2008, March). Testing the joy out of learning. Educational Leadership, 65(6), 14-18. Retrieved September 24, 2008, from Academic Search Premier database. No child left behind act. (2007, October 19). The New York Times. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/n/no_ child_left_behind_act/index.html?scp=1spot&sq=No%20Child%20Left%20Behind%20Act&st=cse. Perkins-Gough, D. (2007, November). Are U.S. students getting better in mathematics? Educational Leadership, 65(3), 91-92. Retrieved September 24, 2008, from Academic Search Premier database. Ravitch, D. (2007, October 3). Get congress out of the classroom. The New York Times. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from No Child Left Behind 30 Ravitch, D. (2009, September). Time to kill ‘no child left behind.’ Education Digest, 75(1), 4-6. Retrieved September 2, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database. Reed, D. (2005, April/May). Marian the librarian meets NCLB. Library Media Connection, 23(7), 56-58. Retrieved September 2, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database. Rosenfield, B. (2004, November). No subject left behind? Think again. NEA Today, 23(3), 26-27. Retrieved September 24, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database. Simpson, R. L., LaCava, P. G., & Graner, P.S. (2004, November). The no child left behind act: Challenges and implications for educators. Intervention in School & Clinic, 40(2), 67-75. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from Academic Search Premier database. Social studies in the era of no child left behind. (2007, September). Social Education, 71(5), 284. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from Academic OneFile database. Toch, T. (2006, November). Turmoil in the testing industry. Educational Leadership, 64(3), 53-57. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database. U.S. Department of Education. (2003, June). No child left behind: A parent’s guide. Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/parents/academic/involve/nclbguide/parentsguide.html. U.S. Department of Education. (2009, March 31). Letters to chief state school officers regarding an update on several NCLB cornerstones. Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/cornerstones/index.html#va. Virginia Department of Education. (2007). Standards of learning currently in effect for Virginia public schools. Retrieved September 5, 2009, from Standards of Learning Web Site: http://www.doe.virginia.gov/go/Sols/home.shtml. Zamosky, L. (2008, March). Social studies: Is it history? District Administration, 44(4), 46-50. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bush who passed the Act “No Child left Behind,” with the purpose of improving America’s academic achievement. Base on Bush’s act all children were and are required to take tests to evaluate their success during the school year ensuring the budget for the next year. The reality in this days is that professor and staff are so concerned about how to prepare the students in order to obtain good grades and money for the school that they are leaving behind important contents and current topics that may affect the American society making them…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Darling- Hammond, Linda. "Evaluating 'No Child Left Behind ' | The Nation." The Nation 21 May 2007: 1-5. CQ Researcher. Web. 12 Mar. 2013.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nclb Act Pros And Cons

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    On January 8, 2002, former president George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act, which attempted to improve school’s test scores and accountability. The Act set out to improve education. With the decline in test scores and the racial discrimination in schools, it was time for a change. The change came through the NCLB Act when it tried to fix the issues in schools and make a positive impact for the children. Even though under the NCLB Act some goals were met, overall, the act was not effective in teaching other subjects other than the subjects required, instilling character in our students, and maintaining the consistency of the standards for passing.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was signed into law in January, 2002 by President George W. Bush. On the surface, because of bipartisan support, the act brought about, for the first time, surveillance measures to ensure that all school-aged children would receive a free, quality, public education. When researched historically we see the pattern that has emerged through policy and politics that has brought about NCLB. As a result of the acceptance of NCLB, we have created a way of viewing success in education by standardized testing, a monster in and of itself in it’s cost and ability to quantify the successful components of a good liberal education. It is necessary to understand how the Act came about, how it is being implemented, and the problems that have ensued to gain a good perspective about the philosophy and policies of the NCLB.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nclb Pros And Cons

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "Nothing helps a child learn as much as a great teacher," said Secretary Spellings (October 8, 2008, press release). "Yet we often find our most experienced and effective teachers in our least challenging settings. Until this trend is reversed, we will not be able to solve our education system 's - and our country 's - biggest challenges. We must do a better job of treating teachers like the professionals they are and rewarding those who take on tougher work and get results." By encouraging effective professional development this encourages teachers to better themselves to better educate our children. This also provides funds for programs that encourage teachers to remain current on educational trends. With these provisions a significant portion of this money is often spent to help teachers better prepare students for standardized testing. NCLB receives grants for excellence in teaching. This money is provided to reward successful teachers and principals. The downside is that the success of teachers and principals is often measured through the same flawed instrument of students ' test scores on the standardized tests. In 2006 President Bush created the Teacher Incentive Fund, which supports districts in rewarding teachers and principals who have increased student achievement and helps to recruit and retain high quality teachers and principals in the neediest…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Impact of NCLB

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act functions as a data driven decision-making educational tool. This governmental act also provides support to teachers and administrators so that they can achieve these goals. One of the main aspects of the legislation was to have effective teachers in every classroom. The implementation process to achieve this transformation goal must be well planned out due to the number of uncertified teachers in the classroom prior to the act being implemented ( Left…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “A hopeful America is one in which not one child is left behind.” This quote from President George W. Bush at a recent news conference represents the current philosophy of our government on education. In 2001 President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The new law is an updated version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) which was signed into law in 1965. Since then standardized testing has been a part of our school system in one form or another, yet there is little evidence that these tests have improved children’s learning through the years.…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American education system has been on a gradual decline over the past several years and has become very non competitive to other nations across the world. This is quite surprising considering the fact that America has one of the most developed and strongest economies in the world yet is so far behind other countries in the education matter. One of the most recent debated issues in the U.S. Department of Education, is the 2002 No Child Left Behind Act signed by former President George W. Bush. According to many education intellects, this act is holding America back from achieving its full potential and getting back on track with the rest of the world. Diane Ravitch, who is a historian of American education, addresses this issue in “Time to Kill ‘No Child Left Behind.’” She says, “Congress should get rid of…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nclb Thesis

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States educational system is preforming poorly compared to the rest of the world: America is ranked 17th in educational performance, 25th in Math, 17th in Science, and 14th in Reading skills. Disabled, minority, and underprivileged children are lacking the adequate resources to succeed in our school system. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was a revised version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (EASA) proposed by former President George Bush in 2001. The intent was to reform the educational system so American’s schools could have the opportunity to thrive domestically and internationally, grant children equality of opportunity, and boost students K-12 level of understanding in core subjects, such as science, technology, and math. This initiative sought to improve our lagging educational system in the U.S to inch closer to higher achieving educational standards, such as the United Kingdom. However, No Child Left Act is hindering children’s chance of a “healthy start, a head start, a fair start, a safe start, and a moral start in life,” by amplifying undesired pressure on students through standardized testing, increasing federal jurisdiction within schools, and minimizing the roles of additional core subjects, such as social studies and foreign languages. This…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the children of America’s education, every child depends upon the accountability of their family, educators and the government. When President George W. Bush was in office, he expressed that “Too many of our neediest children are being left behind”. President Bush proposed the legislation of No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) on January 8, 2002, to improve the quality of life and education for our nation. The No Child Left Behind Act was one of the more favorable and focused policy problems, shortly after the September 11th, attack. As it is understood, the government strongly believed that it was a necessity to continue to improve education now more than ever. The policy process was a pluralistic approach along with…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nclb Argument

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Ravitch, Diane. "Time to Kill 'No Child Left Behind '." Education Digest 75.1 (2009): 4.…

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High School and Act

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    5. Potter, Thomas, Joseph C. Wegwert, Catherine Haerr. No Child Left Behind and the Illusion of Reform. University Press of America 2006.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No Child Left Behind

    • 2624 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act has stacked the deck against schools with special needs. At this point in time with the 2004 elections right around the corner, it seems that this Act is taking a lot of criticism for it's rigid approach to the educational progress of our children today. No Child Left Behind has some wonderful goals and aspirations: to "close the student achievement gap, make public schools accountable, set standards of excellence for every child, and put a qualified teacher in every classroom". (http://www.NCLB.gov) In this paper I will be discussing how this new law closes "the student achievement gap" and setting "standards of excellence for every child" using some of the psychological principles that we have covered in this course. Also I will be addressing some of the flaws that this law has by not addressing some of the theories of psychological developments discussed in our text.…

    • 2624 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Law was passed by Congress in 2001in an attempt to increase the federal role in education and mandate requirements that will affect every public school in America, including Texas. The goal of the NCLB act was to create procedures intended to shut achievement gaps between different groups of students. States are mandated to increase student testing, gather and publicize subgroup results, guarantee a highly qualified teacher in every classroom, and guarantee that all students, despite of socioeconomic factors, attain a capable level of education and that no child will be left behind. It basically requires states to make more extensive changes and meet exceptionally positive deadlines. Obeying the requirements of NCLB is going to be a challenge for many states and teachers if they want to continue receiving federal funding and not to be replaced with someone more highly trained.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Educational Reform

    • 2855 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Tavakolian, H., & Howell, N. (2012). The Impact of No Child Left Behind Act. Franklin…

    • 2855 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays