The No Child Left Behind Act was intended to improve academic achievement.
The goal was to help those succeed who are left behind or disadvantaged, close the gap
between the advantage, eliminate failure, and determine or measure progress.
Topic Progress made in education based on the No Child Left Behind Act
Proposal I will argue that this act cannot define success in a educational school
system, or guarantee that a child will not be left behind. With schools facing budget cuts,
this limits how a school can help a student improve. This act also requires a qualified
teacher in the classroom who is dedicated to those who are falling behind. I recommend
a government aided program to instruct teachers on how to help these students succeed
and become better learners. There is more effort that can be given from teachers,
government, and even parents.
Counter-argument An argument opposing my opinion of how success can be
measured, and that it doesn’t seem to be a huge concern in today’s society.
In research I would like to find input from, maybe, teachers and parents to
provide evidence in a lack of succeeding in this act. With this research it could sway an
opinion on the effectiveness of the No Child Left Behind Act, and that it is in fact helping
Jones 2
those at a learning disadvantage. I would like to find possible ways to make this act more
efficient and effective to both teachers and student.
Works Cited
Beveridge, Tina. “No Child Left Behind and Fine Arts Classes.” Arts Education Policy
Review, 2010, Vol. 111 Issue 1, 4-7. Print.
Lagana-Riordan, Christine, Jemel P. Aguilar. “What’s Missing from No Child Left
Behind? A Policy Analysis from a Social Work Perspective.” Children &
Schools, July 2009, Vol. 31 Issue 3, 135-144. Print.
”Overview of No Child Left Behind-Major Provisions and Issues for Debate.”
Congressional Digest; May 2008, Vol. 87 Issue 5, p131-137. Print.
Wallis, Claudia, and Sonja Steptoe. “How to Fix No Child Left Behind.” Time, 4 June
2007. Vol. 169 Issue 23, 33-41. Print.
Cited: Beveridge, Tina. “No Child Left Behind and Fine Arts Classes.” Arts Education Policy Review, 2010, Vol. 111 Issue 1, 4-7. Print. Lagana-Riordan, Christine, Jemel P. Aguilar. “What’s Missing from No Child Left Behind? A Policy Analysis from a Social Work Perspective.” Children & Schools, July 2009, Vol. 31 Issue 3, 135-144. Print. ”Overview of No Child Left Behind-Major Provisions and Issues for Debate.” Congressional Digest; May 2008, Vol. 87 Issue 5, p131-137. Print. Wallis, Claudia, and Sonja Steptoe. “How to Fix No Child Left Behind.” Time, 4 June 2007. Vol. 169 Issue 23, 33-41. Print.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
would place the student at a disadvantage when it comes to state mandated tests such as the…
- 37468 Words
- 150 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Cited: Darling- Hammond, Linda. "Evaluating 'No Child Left Behind ' | The Nation." The Nation 21 May 2007: 1-5. CQ Researcher. Web. 12 Mar. 2013.…
- 939 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This is an extension of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society program (Klein, 2015). Johnson’s heart was in the right place but after being tweaked so many times I think that government bureaucrats lost sight of the reason for the original act by Johnson. There was such a focus on competing with other countries that children truly got left behind. The government put so much pressure on schools for their students to perform well on testing that schools had no choice but to start teaching to the test and leave other ways of teaching lessons on the back burner. I was a representative on the school board for our school system here where we live, we had the discussion of NCLB many times. One thing that we had discussed about the NCLB is how mentally disabled students were to take the same testing as the other students, and the testing not taking into consideration that those students would never be able to perform to those…
- 468 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was signed into law in January, 2002 by President George W. Bush. On the surface, because of bipartisan support, the act brought about, for the first time, surveillance measures to ensure that all school-aged children would receive a free, quality, public education. When researched historically we see the pattern that has emerged through policy and politics that has brought about NCLB. As a result of the acceptance of NCLB, we have created a way of viewing success in education by standardized testing, a monster in and of itself in it’s cost and ability to quantify the successful components of a good liberal education. It is necessary to understand how the Act came about, how it is being implemented, and the problems that have ensued to gain a good perspective about the philosophy and policies of the NCLB.…
- 1041 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) is a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and close achievement gaps. Passed with overwhelming bipartisan support from Congress, the law was signed by President George W. Bush on January 8, 2002. Clearly, our children are our future, and as President Bush has expressed. This law allows schools to receive reports cards instead of students.…
- 1018 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In Charles Murray’s article, he has taken a searing stance against the “No Child Left Behind Law”. He sees the Left wing stance as focusing on race, class, and gender. While the Right see public education as an ineffectual monopoly. He sees the goal of the law as being too optimistic and devoid of any contact with reality. He thinks putting all children in the same category, as far as learning abilities, is outlandish at best.…
- 261 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In January 2002 congress, with the encouragement of President Bush, passed a new act that was intended to prevent children from being left behind in education. No Child Left Behind is designed to change the culture of America 's schools by closing the achievement gap, offering more flexibility, giving parents more options, and teaching students based on what works. This was and is a great idea. Children are our future and we need to make sure they get all the opportunities education can give them. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) is a well intentioned yet fundamentally flawed piece of legislation.…
- 1526 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The premise of the No Child Left Behind Act is that every child has an equal opportunity for a good education. For this goal to be met, each state must bring 95-100% of…
- 1969 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The United States educational system is preforming poorly compared to the rest of the world: America is ranked 17th in educational performance, 25th in Math, 17th in Science, and 14th in Reading skills. Disabled, minority, and underprivileged children are lacking the adequate resources to succeed in our school system. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was a revised version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (EASA) proposed by former President George Bush in 2001. The intent was to reform the educational system so American’s schools could have the opportunity to thrive domestically and internationally, grant children equality of opportunity, and boost students K-12 level of understanding in core subjects, such as science, technology, and math. This initiative sought to improve our lagging educational system in the U.S to inch closer to higher achieving educational standards, such as the United Kingdom. However, No Child Left Act is hindering children’s chance of a “healthy start, a head start, a fair start, a safe start, and a moral start in life,” by amplifying undesired pressure on students through standardized testing, increasing federal jurisdiction within schools, and minimizing the roles of additional core subjects, such as social studies and foreign languages. This…
- 1474 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Gentry, M. (2006, Fall 2006), No Child Left Behind: Neglecting Excellence. Roeper Review, 29(1), 24-27.…
- 1347 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (often referred to as No Child Left Behind) was a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools. President George W. Bush described this law as the "cornerstone of my administration" (Department of Education). It allows low-income families, whose children traditionally have less academic opportunities, to move to private school or specialized charter schools via a school voucher. The act was expected to introduce high standards for education, the belief that all children, regardless of class, should have equal opportunities to learn, and accountability for failing school systems. However, the act…
- 1045 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
When it comes to the children of America’s education, every child depends upon the accountability of their family, educators and the government. When President George W. Bush was in office, he expressed that “Too many of our neediest children are being left behind”. President Bush proposed the legislation of No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) on January 8, 2002, to improve the quality of life and education for our nation. The No Child Left Behind Act was one of the more favorable and focused policy problems, shortly after the September 11th, attack. As it is understood, the government strongly believed that it was a necessity to continue to improve education now more than ever. The policy process was a pluralistic approach along with…
- 223 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Lets first start by explaining what the Act entails. As defined by Wikipedia, The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-110), more commonly known as NCLB, is a United States federal law signed on January 8, 2002 by George Bush, that reauthorizes a number of federal programs that aim to improve the performance of primary and secondary schools by increasing the standards of accountability for state, school districts and schools, as well as providing parents more flexibility in choosing which schools their children will attend. NCLB is built on four principles: accountability for results, more choices for parents, greater local control and flexibility, and an emphasis on doing what works based on scientific research. Additionally, it promotes an increased focus on reading and re-authorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). NCLB is the latest federal legislation which enact the theories of standards-based education reform, which is based on the belief that high expectations and setting of goals will result in success for all students. Under the new law, every racial and demographic group in each school must meet rising goals on English and math tests to make "adequate yearly progress." This Act tests reading and math skills of…
- 1525 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The No Child Left Behind Law was passed by Congress in 2001in an attempt to increase the federal role in education and mandate requirements that will affect every public school in America, including Texas. The goal of the NCLB act was to create procedures intended to shut achievement gaps between different groups of students. States are mandated to increase student testing, gather and publicize subgroup results, guarantee a highly qualified teacher in every classroom, and guarantee that all students, despite of socioeconomic factors, attain a capable level of education and that no child will be left behind. It basically requires states to make more extensive changes and meet exceptionally positive deadlines. Obeying the requirements of NCLB is going to be a challenge for many states and teachers if they want to continue receiving federal funding and not to be replaced with someone more highly trained.…
- 386 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Tavakolian, H., & Howell, N. (2012). The Impact of No Child Left Behind Act. Franklin…
- 2855 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays