Preview

No Child Left Behind Is It Broken

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2604 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
No Child Left Behind Is It Broken
Is No Child Left Behind Broken?
Liberty University

Abstract

This paper includes a reference list of literature relating to the research question “Has reading and math scores improved since No Child Left Behind Act has been in place”? In studying the literature it seems to suggest that the NCLB Act is broken and has not done what it was designed to do. Questions have been raised such as has there been no affect in the reading and math scores on the CRCT since NCLB has been implemented back in 2001.

Keywords: No Child Left Behind Act, CRCT scores, math and reading CRCT scores, NCLB broken, grades,

Is No Child Left Behind Broken?
What is the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 it is a milestone in education reform intended to improve student achievement and change the culture of America 's schools. President George W. Bush describes this law as the "cornerstone of my administration." Clearly, our children are our future, and, as President Bush has expressed, "Too many of our neediest children are being left behind." With passage of No Child Left Behind, Congress reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)--the principal federal law affecting education from kindergarten through high school. In amending ESEA, the new law represents a sweeping overhaul of federal efforts to support elementary and secondary education in the United States. It is built on four common-sense pillars: accountability for results; an emphasis on doing what works based on scientific research; expanded parental options; and expanded local control and flexibility. “It is being widely reported that a new study shows there have been improvements in math and reading test results since passage of the No Child Left Behind Act five years ago, but the report itself says the cause of the gains is not clear. The independent nonprofit Center on Education Policy (CEP) released the report, Answering the Question that Matters Most: Has Student Achievement Increased Since No



References: Cronin, J., Dahlin, M., Adkins, D., & Kingsbury, G. G. (2007, October). The Proficiency Illusion. Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED498573.pdf Hoerandner, C Houston, P. D. (2007, June). The Seven Deadly Sins Of No Child Left Behind. Phi Delta Kappan, 88, 744-748. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu:2048/docview/218481677/abstract?accountid=12085 James, R McColl, A. (2005, September). Has “No Child” Left Behind the Constitution? The Education Digest, 71(1), 4-13. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu:2048/docview/218185234/abstract?accountid=12085 Shakrani, S Study finds test scores up since NCLB, but cause remains unclear. (2004). Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/home/16231.htm Walsh, K

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bush who passed the Act “No Child left Behind,” with the purpose of improving America’s academic achievement. Base on Bush’s act all children were and are required to take tests to evaluate their success during the school year ensuring the budget for the next year. The reality in this days is that professor and staff are so concerned about how to prepare the students in order to obtain good grades and money for the school that they are leaving behind important contents and current topics that may affect the American society making them…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main question that Thomas S. Dee and Brian Jacob are investigating is whether or not the No Child Left Behind Act has effected student achievement, as indicated in standardized test scores. They state that empirical research on the No Child Left Behind Act is sparse; however, researchers have attempted to identify national patterns regarding student achievement and the No Child Left Behind Act. Nonetheless, each study has reached a significantly different conclusion. Dee and Jacob attribute these findings to the fact that these studies have lacked a legitimate control group, and therefore are unable to differentiate between the effects of the No Child Left Behind Act and miscellaneous factors (Dee & Jacob 2011). Thus, Dee and Jacob…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2002 President Bush and democratic Senator Edward M. Kennedy supported the reform bill Np child Left Behind Act. This act created higher standard and goals for schools in order to improve the education system across all the states. There are four main pillars, the first are results, the scores are broken down by demographics and then it is determined if the school is needed to add more programs in order to better the scores. If no improvement is made then the school will have to reorganize. The second is that the funds are more flexible when it comes to spending. The third pillar is government created programs like, “Reading First”. the last pillar is the ability for student’s parents to change their child’s school because the scores are not being met, without extra charge on the school or the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Darling- Hammond, Linda. "Evaluating 'No Child Left Behind ' | The Nation." The Nation 21 May 2007: 1-5. CQ Researcher. Web. 12 Mar. 2013.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nclb Essay

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) is a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and close achievement gaps. Passed with overwhelming bipartisan support from Congress, the law was signed by President George W. Bush on January 8, 2002. Clearly, our children are our future, and as President Bush has expressed. This law allows schools to receive reports cards instead of students.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nclb Pros And Cons

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In January 2002 congress, with the encouragement of President Bush, passed a new act that was intended to prevent children from being left behind in education. No Child Left Behind is designed to change the culture of America 's schools by closing the achievement gap, offering more flexibility, giving parents more options, and teaching students based on what works. This was and is a great idea. Children are our future and we need to make sure they get all the opportunities education can give them. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) is a well intentioned yet fundamentally flawed piece of legislation.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “A hopeful America is one in which not one child is left behind.” This quote from President George W. Bush at a recent news conference represents the current philosophy of our government on education. In 2001 President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The new law is an updated version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) which was signed into law in 1965. Since then standardized testing has been a part of our school system in one form or another, yet there is little evidence that these tests have improved children’s learning through the years.…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American education system has been on a gradual decline over the past several years and has become very non competitive to other nations across the world. This is quite surprising considering the fact that America has one of the most developed and strongest economies in the world yet is so far behind other countries in the education matter. One of the most recent debated issues in the U.S. Department of Education, is the 2002 No Child Left Behind Act signed by former President George W. Bush. According to many education intellects, this act is holding America back from achieving its full potential and getting back on track with the rest of the world. Diane Ravitch, who is a historian of American education, addresses this issue in “Time to Kill ‘No Child Left Behind.’” She says, “Congress should get rid of…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    School to Prison Pipeline

    • 2888 Words
    • 12 Pages

    In 2001, then-president George Bush sought to save the children and reverse poor educational trajectories with what seemed to be a well thought out plan. The ‘No Child Left Behind’ Act would save our youth and close the gap between urban youth and wealthy children and the way they are taught from birth to college. This act would allow all children to receive the education they deserved no matter their race, gender, social class, or US citizenship. Through a standardized test based curriculum, these children would, in theory, have equal opportunity to receive top-notch education by highly qualified teachers in great schools. Higher test scores would lead to increased funding and more resources, thus perpetuating a cycle of change for the better. The very name was held up as an emblem of equality and hope for many poor, immigrant urban or otherwise marginalized children and families, who without this act would be left to fend for themselves in a failing system. No Child Left…

    • 2888 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nclb Thesis

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States educational system is preforming poorly compared to the rest of the world: America is ranked 17th in educational performance, 25th in Math, 17th in Science, and 14th in Reading skills. Disabled, minority, and underprivileged children are lacking the adequate resources to succeed in our school system. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was a revised version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (EASA) proposed by former President George Bush in 2001. The intent was to reform the educational system so American’s schools could have the opportunity to thrive domestically and internationally, grant children equality of opportunity, and boost students K-12 level of understanding in core subjects, such as science, technology, and math. This initiative sought to improve our lagging educational system in the U.S to inch closer to higher achieving educational standards, such as the United Kingdom. However, No Child Left Act is hindering children’s chance of a “healthy start, a head start, a fair start, a safe start, and a moral start in life,” by amplifying undesired pressure on students through standardized testing, increasing federal jurisdiction within schools, and minimizing the roles of additional core subjects, such as social studies and foreign languages. This…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High School and Act

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act is designed to raise the achievement levels of subgroups of students such as African Americans, Latinos, low-income students, and special education students to a state-determined level of proficiency. However, since its introduction in 2001, it has received a lot of criticism. Some argue the ulterior motives of the Act while others commend its innovation and timing. With the Bush administration coming to an end, it is difficult to determine what will happen to the Act or how effective it will continue to be. Hopefully future lawmakers will be able to evaluate the pros and cons of the Act and the impact it will have on our youth.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Educational Reform

    • 2855 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Tavakolian, H., & Howell, N. (2012). The Impact of No Child Left Behind Act. Franklin…

    • 2855 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Policy Research

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 2001 when No Child Left Behind took effect it sparked the desire to use assessments to measures and to improve student learning. In the beginning these assessments focused on state tests, and found that results were not sufficient to identify students that were not keeping with up with fellow students. No Child Left Behind is a great theory, but in a realistic approach to the problem. We need give our government credit for taking bold steps to try to help our public schools, but need to realize the damages of No Child Left Behind are still being felt.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enabaling Ignorance

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “No child left behind” act (NCLB) passed this year through congress which was originally passed in 2002, that shows how can be common sense and experience is replaced. The author, Diane Ravitch pointed out in her book that NCLB promotes the weakness in American public school, rather than improving their strengths. The idea of passing NCLB proven wrong, because it is wasting of federal dollars, it increases corruption, and it a-parts teachers from the school system.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays