Niles Vs. San Rafael Case Study
In the case of Niles vs. San Rafael, the primary issue at hand is negligence on the behalf of Mount Zion hospital, the City of San Rafael, the public school district, and pediatric physician Dr. David Haskins. Negligence, as it pertains to health care, is defined as a failure to act with reasonable care, and results in injury or detriment to any patient or other individual. In connection to a head injury Niles sustained while at a ball field, all of the previously named have been held liable for Niles’ permanently incapacitated state.
Consequential ethics and utilitarian ethics theories are most applicable in this case. In the consequential theory, the consequentialist considers the morally right act or failure to act is one that will produce
Consequential ethics and utilitarian ethics theories are most applicable in this case. In the consequential theory, the consequentialist considers the morally right act or failure to act is one that will produce