Preview

Nietzsche : God Is Dead

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
764 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nietzsche : God Is Dead
The Question: State your understanding of the philosophy of F. Nietzsche. What does he mean by saying "God is Dead"?

Nietzsche's philosophy is that of a radical view as it calls for the complete reevaluation of morals and blatantly attacks the Judeo-Christian tradition in modern society. He believed one should dare to become who they are. In order to ascertain one's full potential as a human being, the ethic system of which by society runs, must be changed as it only hampers one's will to power. According to Nietzsche, philosophy is not the pursuit of truth, for there are no truths, only interpretations, instead it is an attempt on the creator's behalf to interpret reality in their favor. To illustrate this point he examines master morality as opposed to slave morality. Master morality simply defined is a system of what is good and what is evil, set up by and based on those who have power. So it is not surprising that it would regard the attributes of a noble to be inherently good and those of a weaker peasant to be evil or, rather, undesirable. Since it is the rich and powerful who define this morality, it is built to their benefit. Contrary to master morality, there is slave morality and likewise it is built with the same biases only differing as it leans to benefit the poor. This system of ethics overturned that of the master, by twisting all virtues hailed as good by noble aristocrats, into evils, slowly over the course of time. Then goodness is translated into weaker friendlier virtues such as that of sympathy and equality. A good example of the slave morality can be seen in Judeo-Christian values which encompass and encourage all the characteristics of the weak while suppressing power.
Nietzsche saw these values to be unnatural of human nature. So for one to deny their power and surrender to a value system that is irrelevant to our times would be decadent to themselves. He also believed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    ‘Morals’ is defined as: ‘standards of behavior; principles of right and wrong’; they tend to be imposed by society.…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The professor Philip Hallie’s ‘From Cruelty to Goodness’ radiates unwavering genuine philanthropy which by its nature oppose the cruelty and imbalance of power he talks about. The understanding of how cruelty works goes through the understanding what cruelty is and what morality has to say about that. Professor Hallie recognizes two types of ethics- negative and positive- that illuminate the path of good-making. The negative is the ban for actions associated with deliberate harm-making and pain-inflicting on other human beings. The most significant negative ethical rules are the Ten Commandments, says the professor. As reverse, the positive rules enjoin actions that preserve human’s welfare. The positive ethics commands activity; demands courage, and takes sacrifice. The positive ethical rules are for the brave. In close association with the ethical rules, whether negative or positive, comes the question what cruelty is? Had we looked at the institutionalized type of cruelty from the near past to nowadays as the slavery, the Holocaust, the political prisons and the prisoner-of-war camps we would see the cruelty is not mere bloodshed, cut-off limbs, beatings and other atrocities which all are included though. The cruelty goes beyond that- it affects the self-respect, self-esteem, all of that which makes person a person and destroys it. So the cruelty not only (often) kills the body, it first kills the spirit, the soul, the life inside. As professor Hallie uncovers the cruelty derives from something so frequently seen as the imbalanced power in the relationship. The relationship could be both personal (private) or institutionalized. The imbalance is being born when the power between the two parties is unequally distributed, often leaving one of the parties with negligible or no power. Respectively, the strong party gains not only the power to decide for herself but to rule over the destiny of the powerless side. The imbalance of power resides in families, business…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 1600 Ch 3 Questions

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This describes people think of moral right and wrong in terms of conforming to important social expectations and rules.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical philosophers of the nineteenth century were less sure that general moral qualities could be maintained. For Marx morality and morals were a piece of middle class philosophy: sets of thoughts that overlooked the exploitative monetary courses of action of society and added to False Consciousness. Nietzsche took a gander at the starting points of morality, and like Marx, saw moral frameworks as emerging from the hobbies of social gatherings. For Nietzsche the individual needed to go past acknowledged morality to make another morality for him. In the twentieth century, there has been developing negativity about the likelihood of a widespread moral framework. Jean-Paul Sartre accentuated the subjective judgments that an individual must make so as to be genuine.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The more powerful, noble men saw themselves as good when they observed the contrast between themselves and those inferior to them: the weak, poor, and common people. Here Nietzsche introduces the contrast between master morality and slave morality and how the first concept of good and bad arose. As I mentioned earlier, the masters, nobles, and stronger people defined good as a reflection of themselves. Now when they came to contact with the weak, the slaves, the poor, and the common people, they attributed the concept of bad to them as the opposite side to what they saw on themselves. Their position of power is what also gave them control over language the power label things such as what is good and what is bad. On the other hand when the weak side came into contact with the nobles, after realizing they were inferior to the nobles, the feeling of ressentiment arose, which as we will later see, rearranged the concept of good and…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli spoke of a balance between good and evil. "In actual fact, a prince may not have all of the admirable qualities listed, but it is necessary that he should seem to have them. Indeed I will venture to say that when you have them and exercise them all of the time, they are harmful to you; when you just seem to have them, they are useful. It is good to appear merciful, truthful, humane, sincere, and religious; it is good to be so in reality. But you must keep your mind so disposed that, in…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For as long as an authority has existed, there have been those who have challenged it, rebelled against it, and even refused to acknowledge it. Institutions that hold great power have composed what is right and wrong to those under their control. However, when an individual’s personal convictions come into conflict with authorities established morality, punishments often follow. Voltaire was correct in his assertion that “it is dangerous to be right” because there are many consequences, especially when authorities can become easily corruptible. People in power want to keep their position.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "What Is Empathy? — PsyBlog." Psychology Studies Relevant to Everyday Life from PsyBlog. Web. 06 Dec. 2011. <http://www.spring.org.uk/2007/01/what-is-empathy.php>.…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    capitalist society at the time, which worried him with its increasing selfishness and individuality (where…

    • 1348 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nietzsche particularly critiqued Christian and Kantian morality, related to these 2 moral components of which express cultural out casting of freedom of speech and natural free will.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article begins by detailing the human desire for social power and how, through class, certain forms of power are achieved. He contends that the pursuit of social power is essentially an attempt to acquire social honour. Weber also mentions that power does not always lead to social honour and uses the notion of the American Boss as an example. However, he acknowledges that those who are considered honourable by society often gain social power or have a greater chance to do so.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What does Zarathustra tell us about the challenges of leading people who have become too comfortable and uncritical?…

    • 785 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Having morals in society is very important to our well-being and harmony due to our psychological egoism. In order to understand this fully we need to consider how our society would be like without morals. Without having a government enforcing rules and laws on us we would all live freely and selfishly to please ourselves and not think about others. Thomas Hobbes called this the state of nature. (Rachels, 1999: 144). If we think about how society would function under these circumstances it wouldn’t be a very nice place to live in. This is mainly due to everybody striving to have the same needs – needs which cannot be sort out equally to one another. This is where our society begins to get very tricky. We all need food, clothes and shelter – however, there is no unlimited supply of these things for us. This is where it is in our nature to act in our own self-interest. There begins to be a competition for these needs and very rarely can we depend on others to help us…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality is defined as the ability to know right from wrong, and good from bad in our society today and also the societies of the past. Morality is influenced by your family, your religion, and your society. We will be looking at Asia, Africa and the Americas and how their morality was affected by family, religion, and the society.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    that, if followed, will ensure that the person behaving in accordance with it is behaving morally.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays