Preview

New Developments in Technology Management

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7698 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
New Developments in Technology Management
Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2009, Vol. 8, No. 3, 324 –336.

........................................................................................................................................................................

New Developments in Technology Management Education: Background Issues, Program Initiatives, and a Research Agenda
PHILLIP H. PHAN The Johns Hopkins University DONALD S. SIEGEL University at Albany, SUNY MIKE WRIGHT Nottingham University Business School and Erasmus University, Rotterdam We provide background information on key developments and trends in technology management education, including the managerial implications of recent public policy changes designed to stimulate investment in technology and entrepreneurship. We then consider the educational implications of these trends, drawing on lessons learned from papers in the special issue and our own research. Finally, we outline an agenda for future research on technology management education.

........................................................................................................................................................................
INTRODUCTION The teaching of technology management has a long history in business schools. However, the nature and focus of such curricula have changed in recent years, due to several trends. The rise of a knowledge-based economy has brought greater attention to the management and commercialization of intellectual property (Markman, Siegel, & Wright, 2008). Questions regarding the appropriate business models to foster successful commercialization have been further complicated by the rise of “open-source” innovation (e.g., Linux, a software company that has captured substantial market share). And new institutions (e.g., incubators and science parks; Phan, Siegel, & Wright, 2005) and new organizational forms (e.g., research joint ventures [RJVs], and technology alliances) have emerged that may also have



References: Ambos, T., Makela, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D’Este, P. 2008. When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 1424 –1447. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. 2001. Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press. Carlile, R. P. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13: 442– 455. Inkpen, A., & Tsang, E. 2005. Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 146 – 165. Koh, W., & Phan, P. In Press. The National Innovation System in Singapore. In V. K., Narayanan, & G. O’Connor, (Eds.), Encyclopedia for Technology, Innovation and Management, Blackwell Press: U.K. Locke, R., & Schone, K. 2004. The entrepreneurial shift: Ameri¨ canization in European high-technology management education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Markman, G., Phan, P., Balkin, D., & Gianiodis, P. 2004. Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: Do incentive systems matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3– 4): 353–364. Markman, G., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. 2008. Research and technology commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 1401–1423. Meyer, M. 2008. University patenting and IP management approaches in Europe. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex. Muller-Camen, M., & Salzgeber, S. 2005. Changes in academic work and the chair regime: The case of German business administration academics. Organization Studies, 26(2): 271– 290. Mustar, P., & Wright, M. 2009. Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. Journal of Technology Transfer, forthcoming. Nambisan, S., & Willemon, D. 2003. A global study of graduate management of technology programmes. Technovation, 23: 949 –962. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. 2002. The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1): 78 –95. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. 2004. The business school “business”: Some lessons from the U.S. experience. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8): 1501–1520. Phan, P., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. 2005. Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2): 165–182. Siegel, D. S., & Phan, P. 2005. Analyzing the effectiveness of university technology transfer: Implications for entrepreneurship education. In G. D. Libecap, (Ed.), Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth, volume 16: University entrepreneurship and technology transfer: 1–38. JAI Press: Oxford, UK. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. N. 2003. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1): 27– 48. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L., & Link, A. N. 2004. Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1–2): 115–142. Siegel, D. S., & Wright M. 2007. Intellectual property: The assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4): 529 –540. Souitaris V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. 2007. Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intentions of science and engineering students? The effects of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4): 566 –591. Starkey, K., Hatchuel, A., & Tempest, S. 2004. Rethinking the business school. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8): 1521–1532. Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. 2001. Colonizing knowledge: Commodification as a dynamic of jurisdictional expansion in professional service firms. Human Relations, 54: 933–953. Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 27– 43. Van Burg, E., Romme, G. L., Gilsing, V. A, & Reymenk, I. M. M. J. 2008. Creating university spin-offs: A science-based design perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25: 114 –128. Wright, M., Piva, E., Mosey, S., & Lockett, A. 2009. Academic entrepreneurship and the role of business schools. Journal of Technology Transfer. Phillip Phan is professor and vice dean for Faculty and Research at The Johns Hopkins University Carey Business School. Between 2000 and 2007, he was the Warren H. Bruggeman ’46 and Pauline Urban Bruggeman Distinguished Professor of Management at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Phil is associate editor for the Journal of Business Venturing, the Journal of Financial Stability, and the Journal of Technology Transfer. His most recent books are Theoretical Advances in Family Enterprise Research (InfoAge Press); Entrepreneurship and Economic Development in Emerging Regions (Edward Elgar); and Taking Back the Boardroom: Thriving as a Director in the 21st Century (Imperial College Press). Donald Siegel is dean of the School of Business and professor of management at the University at Albany, SUNY. Don is editor of the Journal of Technology Transfer, associate editor of 336 Academy of Management Learning & Education Journal of Business Venturing, Journal of Productivity Analysis, and Academy of Management Learning & Education. His most recent books are Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Technological Change (Oxford University Press); and the Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press). He has received grants or fellowships from the Sloan Foundation, National Science Foundation, NBER, American Statistical Association, W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, and the U.S. Department of Labor. Professor Siegel is a member of the Advisory Committee to the Secretary of Commerce on “Measuring Innovation in the 21st Century Economy.” Mike Wright has been professor of financial studies at Nottingham University Business School since 1989 and director of the Centre for Management Buy-out Research since 1986. He has written over 25 books and more than 250 papers in academic and professional journals on management buy-outs, venture capital, habitual entrepreneurs, corporate governance, and related topics. He served two terms as an editor of Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (1994 –1999) and is currently a consulting editor of Journal of Management Studies and an associate editor of Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. Mike is also program chair of the Academy of Management Entrepreneurship Division. His latest books include Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe and Private Equity and Management Buyouts. September

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Using the institutional framework helps in better explaining why the efforts to increase university patenting worked and to emphasize ways in which “state actors” contributed towards the development of university patenting, according to Berman. “Institution-builders”, according to Berman, are often those people who are in a position to “bridge diverse groups with complementary resources (Burt quoted in…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    White, M.A, & Bruton, G.D. (2011). The Management of Technology & Innovation: A Strategic Approach (2nd Ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western/Cengage Learning.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 1

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tidd, J., Bessant, J. (04/2011), Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2nd Edition. John Wile & Sons, (UK),VitalBook file. Pgs. 46-48…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Managing Innovation

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The president of Mountain Home University has been asked by her board of trustees to set up a mechanism for the commercialization of technology developed at the university. Such a mechanism is typically called a…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    White, M. & Bruton, G. (2007). The management of technology and innovation: A strategic approach. Mason, OH: Thomson.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PROCESS

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hirsh, R., D., Peters, M., P., & Sheppard, D., A. (2005). Entrepreneurship. (6th ed.). New…

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unit Outline

    • 4391 Words
    • 18 Pages

    This unit focuses on the management of innovation. The fundamental ideas underlying this unit are that (1) innovation is the driving force in establishing a firm’s competitive advantage, (2) innovation is managed by leaders and teams with multiple competencies, and (3) a firm’s innovation strategy emerges from its competencies and capabilities. These fundamentals are then applied to new venture creation through first hand interaction with innovative entrepreneurs developing new innovations and technologies from the business community as well as university developed inventions with intent to commercialise their Intellectual Property. This allows the real world of the innovative entrepreneur to reinforce and…

    • 4391 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    nnotated bib

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Abbey, A. (1989). The strategic management of technological innovation. IndustriaManagement, 31(5), 16. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/211622688?accountid=458…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Non-Profit Capitalism

    • 9824 Words
    • 40 Pages

    Gehani, R. R. (2013, Spring). Class Notes. Management of Technology and Innovatio. Akron, Ohio: University of Akron.…

    • 9824 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Open Innovation

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In light of the trend towards open innovation, inter-organizational technology transfer by means of alliances and licensing has become a key component of the open innovation processes. In this assignment we will discuss how open innovation can be the key of success and open up different opportunities, describe innovation in terms of what managerial consequences it can have on a company and try to find out what can be the driving forces of innovation in a company.…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Innovation

    • 2282 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Barsh, J. (2008). Innovation management: A conversation with Gary Hamell and Lowell Bryan. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 1-10.…

    • 2282 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Innovation at HP

    • 4857 Words
    • 20 Pages

    References: 1. Michael Morris, Donald Kuratko, and Jeffrey Covin, 2007. Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation. 2nd Edition. Cengage/Thomson – Southwestern Publishing.…

    • 4857 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Apple's Strategic Plan

    • 3143 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Apple is outperforming all of the other tech stocks and is considered the “sector leader” over companies such as Microsoft, Oracle, Samsung, and Google because of its strategic plan of innovation, excellence and consumer delight (S&P 500, Nasdaq Celebrate a Record-Breaking Quarter, but It’s All About Apple , 2012). The market value for Apple has topped $600 billion because of their outstanding performance in the industry!…

    • 3143 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Farzi

    • 4518 Words
    • 19 Pages

    References: Barclay, I. and Benson, M. (1990), New Product Development: Organisation and Current Practice, Leadership & Organisation Development Journal, 11, 13-23 Bright J. R. (1969), Some Management Lessons from Technological Innovation Research. Long Range Planning 2 (1), 36-41 Dussauge P. and B Garrette (1999), Cooperative Strategy: Competing Successfully through Strategic Alliances. New York: John Wiley & Son Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E. (1991), Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Goffin, K. and Pfeiffer, R. (1999), Innovation Management in U. K. and German Manufacturing Companies. York: Anglo-German Foundation Granstrand, O. (1982), Technology, Management and Markets: An Investigation of R & D and Innovation in Industrial Organisations. London: Frances Printer Industry Science Resources (ISR) (2000), web-site: www.isr.gov.au/crc March, J. G. (1991), Exploration and Exploitation in Organisational Learning, Organisation Science, 2, 71-87. Martin, M. (1994), Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Technology-Based Firms. New York: John Wiley & Son…

    • 4518 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Innovation Paper

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to effectively promote innovation organizations must give their employees; “meeting and recreational space which lead to spontaneous encounters and informal networking, both are important facilitators of innovation” (Bettina Von Stamm, 2003, para. 1&5). These incentives cannot act alone and instead must act together through managerial efforts with their upper level management. By working together and introducing organizational competitiveness throughout the company, upper level management and everyone else will recognize the results of better communication, coordination and cohesiveness of their innovation related efforts. Through collaborative efforts, organizations become stronger by leveraging and combining the individual strengths and resources of each employee. America’s colleges and universities are key assets that must be tapped in order to advance our nation’s innovation strategy. The United States has the best higher education system in the world and that system should be continually expanding with more students, better trained faculty and more primary research…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays