Preview

Nettie's Accident Ferry Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
68 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nettie's Accident Ferry Case
Yes, at the time of the accident Ferry was under the control of Nettie’s. There was sufficient evidence to determine that at the time of the accident Ferry was engaged primarily in advancing the business interests and was acting within the scope of his employment. Nettie’s had the right to control the manner in which Ferry performed his duties for which he was employed (Twomey, 2013, p. 621).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The case presented dictates eight parties involved. Those eight parties are the marina, Miss Behavin's ship keeper, Odd A Sea's ship keeper, Sea Duction, U.S. Coast Guard, the Ice Harbor Bridge operator, two injured civilians, and all damaged buildings. Evidence was presented to determine who has what claims. The ship Miss Behavin was not properly anchored. The marina's mooring shore anchor for the ship Miss Behavin was improperly constructed and maintained. Therefore, once the ice caused immense pressure onto the ropes and mooring shore anchor, the anchor gave way and the ship began to drift into the moving channel of the river. The only person aboard the Miss Behavin was the ship keeper whom was unable to properly operate the ship. Yet, the ship keeper did try to drop the ship's anchor but failed to do it correctly.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case 04-7 Lighthouse

    • 3560 Words
    • 15 Pages

    05-1 The Revenue Recognition Topic provides guidance for transaction-specific revenue recognition and certain matters related to revenue-generating activities that are not addressed specifically in other Topics. Other Topics may contain transaction-specific revenue recognition guidance related to transactions in those Topics. This Topic includes the following Subtopics:…

    • 3560 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is the liquidated damages clause valid in this case? (Hill, 2014) Now 17,000 was valid and reasonable in light of the language of the contract and to what both Sun Ship and C & H agreed on. But to further penalize was not reasonable. I agree with Sun Ship that in that they tried to invoke the hindsight rule, claiming that “it shouldn't have to pay liquidated damages that were so far out of proportion to the actual damages” (Mihai,n.d.) The situation as it developed was different from the anticipation and the barge was not ready but neither was the tug. C and H were, in fact, able to find other shipping and their crop did not rot, nor were their customers left without sugar. I do believe in the claim by Sun that the actual damages suffered, does not justify the liquidated damages enforced by…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first business that John Jardine (Old Jock) set himself was to cut pine timber for markets. After a time, he engaged a Halifax firm to build him a ship to get the lumber to Britain. He must have turned in quite the profit, he soon established his own ship yard, with a foreman named Neilson, who he brought over from the old country, and in 1819 this pioneer of the industry in Kent County launched his first ship, the ELLEN DOUGLAS.…

    • 2931 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In February 1981, after daily paper records of the fiber analysis, the killer started dumping bodies in Chattahoochee River. The victims were additionally bare, or nearly bare. It gave the idea that the murderer was observing media coverage of the killings, and changing his strategies to decrease fiber evidence on the victim's bodies. Police started staking out bridges along the Chattahoochee River with an end goal to find the murderer dumping a body. Early on the morning of May 22, 1981, police stake out heard a splash and spotted a station wagon on the James Jackson Parkway Bridge, in which the vehicle was stopped and the driver was twenty-three-year-old Wayne Bertram Williams, a music promoter. He was questioned by police, and claimed that…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The respondent’s arguments on appeal were that the trial judge correctly found that it had not breached its duty of care, and if it had breached that duty, the appellant was 100% liable for contributory negligence. This argument gave rise to the second issue: if the respondent breached its duty of care, is the appellant guilty of contributory negligence, and to what extent?…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mismanagement by company-appointed agents is an issue that challenges organizations with hubs in various worldwide locations. Agency problems are detrimental to firms, and if left unchecked, can spell out disaster for a company. For charted companies of the 17th and 18th centuries, managerial commitment was highly impacted by the lengthy gaps in communication with firm directors; often leading to opportunistic behavior among overseas management. While several companies failed, the Hudson Bay Company successfully established a mix of business practices that strived to dismiss workplace deviance. By raising opportunity costs, increasing accountability and developing a social environment, the Hudson Bay Company was successful in minimizing the…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boat Insurance Case Study

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Prepare a first draft BPMN diagram that shows the Boat Sales Insurance Process. Be clear about how the customer interacts with the Insurance Company.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torts 1 Outline Pittman

    • 27721 Words
    • 111 Pages

    1. Facts: P’s husband killed working on a boat owned by D b/c of D’s negligence.…

    • 27721 Words
    • 111 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On February 24, 1928 the Court of Appeals of New York first heard the agreement of Helen Palsgraf verses The Long Island Railroad company, appellant. After three long month of hearing both parties argument the majority ruled that the railroad is not liable for Palsgraf’s injuries because the injuries were not a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the railroads negligence’s. The opposing side argued that if the duty can be traced back to the wrongful act that it is sufficient enough to establish liability. In my opinion I agree with the majority decision that even thought the workers of the Long Island Railroad did help push the man with the package onto the train, they had to way of physically knowing that the package was dangerous and going…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesothelioma Analysis

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It should be called attention to that the individuals who were uncovered in the shipbuilding business incorporate both the shipbuilding workers and the Navy and Marine staff that were appointed to those boats for quite a long time at once. Almost no was done to guarantee the proceeded with soundness of the representatives or servicemen until the mid-70's. Around then, the commercial ventures started to be compelled to give assurance to their workers. It was, on the other hand, past the point of no return for those officially exposed.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Awakening from General Zaroff’s comfortable bed, Rainsford felt he just had the most bizarre dream in his life. What happened slowly came back to his mind. He won in Zaroff’s hunt and then he fell asleep in Zaroff’s bed. Zaroff was the hunter who lived in the enormous building on Ship-Trap Island.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good Afternoon, Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury. When the judge read the indictment to you in the beginning of the case, you all had some pretty strong feelings. That’s understandable murder is a serious crime. It’s very unfortunate that a life had to be lost, but I’m here to tell you Dudley and Stephens should not be prosecuted or charged for the murder of Richard Parker. Dudley and Stephens are the victims of a failed government. Their acts were an act of survival, when all other alternative were tried. We must ask ourselves why we owe allegiance to our government in the first place. The very reason given by Thomas Hobbes is the social contract, the agreement between the people and their government by which the government protects and promotes the interests of the people, receiving loyalty and support from the people in return. Where was the government when the four seamen were lost at sea? The government failed to find these men and protect their lives and liberties. These men knew without government state of nature was inevitable, total chaos, and disorder. This is why these men had to create their own government.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fredrick Fleet was the workman on guard on the Titanic on April 14. Fleet, had warned the personnel on the ship’s control deck to look out for icebergs that night, yet nobody was at the control panel that fateful night (McPherson 6). The Titanic was thought to be unsinkable when it was built in 1911. “More than 2,200 people were now aboard the Titanic including 1,300 passengers” (Senan 16). The location the Titanic deported from was Great Britain and it was headed to New York. After three long days of sailing on the North Atlantic, they stopped in Ireland. A few days later, the ship crashed into an iceberg that had made it’s way into North Atlantic from Greenland (Fahey 4). Many people went back to their rooms to get their valuables from down below (Lord 60). Most historians say that they don’t know the exact number of passengers that were on the Titanic because, there was no accurate list of them. The Titanic was a major disaster but could have been prevented if workers were at their stations.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the "case of the shipwrecked sailors", three men were marooned after the sinking of an oil tanker. Subject to extreme conditions and starvation, the men drew lots after about twenty five days and decided that the loser would be killed and eaten as food. When one of the men lost the draw, he pulled out his consent, and the other two men killed him anyway, eating him. Five days later, the remaining two men were rescued and ensuing actions incurred their murder charges. This seems to be a simple case over the battle of life and death, and it truly is. The two men, Dudley and Stephens, made a conscious decision to commit not only the crime of murder, but the atrocity of cannibalism. Crime is crime and law is law- when breaks a law and commits a crime, a punishment must ensue.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays