Preview

Net Neutrality: Should The Internet Service Providers?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1461 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Net Neutrality: Should The Internet Service Providers?
In 2005 a tiny phone company, Madison River, located in South Carolina blocked its users from making telephone calls from an application called Vonage. Vonage was a competitor of Madison River, so when news reached Michael Powell, who was chairman of the F.C.C (Federal Communications Commission), he fined Madison River and forced them to stop preventing their users from utilizing Vonage (Wu). Due to situations such as the Madison River incident, net neutrality was created to hold Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to specific operational standards. The term "network neutrality" was coined by Columbia Law Professor Tim Wu to describe the effort by believers of an "open access" communications platform to treat all information on a network equally. (Pfister 169). Net neutrality is a set of laws that force ISPs to provide equal access to all applications, content, platforms, and websites (Friedlander 907). The FCC adopted the group of regulations in 2015 and then rescinded them in December 2017 at the request of the new F.C.C. chairman, Ajit Pai. Both sides of this argument agree that the internet is crucial to the welfare of society and the progression of the economy. Proponents recommend that the government should continue to uphold the net neutrality laws. Opponents declare the government should not regulate the internet with such constraints ("Net Neutrality: Should the Government Mandate Net Neutrality?"). …show more content…
Certain individuals believe that lifting net neutrality would open a free market. In addition, these supporters claim that there are very few violations of net neutrality. The assumption is that the ISPs will abide by a code of honor and not block rivals websites. The people against net neutrality believe that lifting it would lead to a free market, few violations, and will not limit the open

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Net neutrality”. Two words that seem to pop up every few years, met with the internet’s fury, just to disappear from the public’s collective conscience. Although the words are familiar, the definition is sometimes not. Net neutrality is defined by Dictionary.com as, “the concept that...internet service providers should provide nondiscriminatory access to Internet content…”. Net neutrality is often at risk, thanks to new law proposals that, similarly to the words, seem to keep popping up every few years. Most people would ask, why would such a thing keep coming under fire?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the recent expansions in the availability of technology, the ability to access information has become increasingly more common. This ability to search for information and view content through the internet is currently protected in the United States under a set of laws that are commonly referred to as Net Neutrality regulations. Although many people are unaware of what the concept of net neutrality is, it is understood that the results of any change to current internet regulations would affect have long-lasting effects on all internet users. “Net Neutrality” is a concept that was defined and popularized by Tim Wu, a legal scholar and net neutrality advocate, as being, “the idea that any network traffic… can move from one place to any other place without discrimination” (Lohr 1). Recently, this equal access to content has come under attack by certain groups that would stand to profit from the removal of current net neutrality regulations, such as internet service providers…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are people who think net neutrality is ethical; there are several reasons for it. Net neutrality gives non-discriminatory access to the internet which means every website and the content on the internet is treated in the same way. It treats each person in the same way also. For instance, a housewife describing a recipe and a millionaire talking about the company’s new product are treated equally. Net neutrality provides a platform for innovation and creativity. It gives a chance to grow up to new websites, online stores and other e-commerce websites.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality Rules

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    (Finley, K 2015). Dozen of Internet Service Providers, including the big companies like, Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon are against Net Neutrality because they say that the rules are too restrictive. Net Neutrality will prevent ISP's from doing what they want with all the content and traffic that they deliver. Internet Service Providers also claim Net Neutrality will hinder investment and innovation.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    But, what the FCC isn’t taking into account is the millions of internet users that want to keep internet neutrality. With net neutrality maintained, users of the internet will have equal access to the internet, which will increase their total…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is also a general disagreement among what the outcomes and effects of net neutrality will be on ISPs, the internet and consumers. For example, proponents state that market competition and anti-competitive laws are not enough to ensure net neutrality. On the other hand, opponents of net neutrality claim that the current standards are sufficient. Not to mention, both sides argue that their methods will encourage innovations while the alternative limits…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A writer for Wired, a technology focused magazine and website, even states, “Net neutrality is a dead man walking. The execution date isn’t set, but it could be days, or months (at best)” (Ammori). This is assumed quite a bit in part because the court systems that struck down the original FCC rules seems to be heavily in favor of corporations over the public interest. It also doesn’t help that ISPs are currently offering a false compromise with the FCC. The current rules that the FCC is voting on would allow the FCC to tell ISPs that they are not allowed to block sites entire for no reason, but they would be allowed to throttle any website for any reason of their choosing. This is very worrying, because as Marvin Ammori put it, “Once the court voids the nondiscrimination rule, AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast will be able to deliver some sites and services more quickly and reliably than others for any reason. Whim. Envy. Ignorance. Competition. Vengeance. Whatever. Or, no reason at all.” If our internet is controlled by the decisions of corporations we are in for a bleak future. Websites like Wikipedia, which provide a wealth of free information, would have trouble being able to provide their services to the public for free as they would be facing a set of fees assessed by each ISP based off of the amount of users that access their website. Free sites that share information with people…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Kriens, S. (2006, November 29). Net Neutrality. Speech presented at Stanford Technology Venture Program, Stanford. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1638…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killswitch Documentary

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Internet has become a popular source of mainstream media. A battle is raging over the control of the Internet, and the rights of the American people are at stake. The documentary Killswitch, exposes the true power of the Internet and how the government is controlling that power; violating freedom of speech and the right to privacy. The documentary takes a stand in favor of Net Neutrality, which is the principle that the Internet enables access to all-content without choosing or blocking certain websites. The efforts of Aaron Swartz and Edward Snowden to win back Internet freedom are highlighted in this documentary in order to appeal to American citizens to take action in favor of Net Neutrality. “Freedom is embedded in technology and we have to protect technology if we want to protect our freedom” (Killswitch). Internet regulation grants power to the Government and violates constitutional rights of Americans hindering the Nation’s founding principle of democracy.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The government should continue regulations and keep control over net neutrality. Net Neutrality greatly benefits the people of the internet. The current regulations allow people to be free online. They are able to express their opinions and feelings with a free, uncensored internet. With net neutrality, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are not allowed to censor and control what people see on the internet, meaning that manipulation and bias is not possible on the internet.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I reviewed an article titled “Net Neutrality” that appeared in the New York Times on Dec. 22, 2010. The idea of net neutrality is that ISPs should treat all data equally. Some ISPs, such as AT&T and Comcast, favor a different stance that would restrict consumer’s access to content and charge a consumer more based on their level of usage. This issue has heated up in the past decade as the need for bandwidth has steadily increased due to more internet users and the advent of streaming video and audio.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Net Neutrality is a legal concept that has recently been the focus of numerous media headlines. Let me make this clear. Net Neutrality is not simply another meandering piece of legislature, rather it is philosophical idea woven into law. Now that this philosophy has been written into law by the United States government the true nature of its framework coming to light ("What the heck is net neutrality? - The Washington Post," n.d.). Net Neutrality has been a leading topic of discussion in the field of technology for quite some time, yet few know exactly what the term means. This is very unfortunate because the subject matter has the potential to significantly impact us all. The following text will explain the ins and outs of Net Neutrality and…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Of particular importance is the deregulation of the telecommunications industry as mentioned in the act ("Implementation of the Telecommunications Act," NTLA). This reflects a new thinking that service providers should not be limited by artificial and now antique regulatory categories but should be permitted to compete with each other in a robust marketplace that contains many diverse participants. Moreover the Act is evidence of governmental commitment to make sure that all citizens have access to advanced communication services at affordable prices through its "universal service" provisions even as competitive markets for the telecommunications industry expand. Prior to passage of this new Act, U.S. federal and state laws and a judicially established consent decree allowed some competition for certain services, most notably among long distance carriers. Universal service for basic telephony was a national objective, but one developed and…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blown To Bits Analysis

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The FCC regulates the media sources of the United States of America. The regulate the radios and television of america. They ensure that there is not any malicious content being broadcasted to the American public. The FCC wished to censor the internet after they successfully censored television and radio. I think this is ridiculous the purpose of the internet is to be able to communicate and transfer information of any sort or any kind between people. This regulation would destroy the purpose of the internet. It is up to the user to decide whether or not something is malicious content not the…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays