Preview

Negligence & Rights of Creditors

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1042 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Negligence & Rights of Creditors
Questions:
1. Define Negligence or Culpa.
2. What are the kinds of Negligence?
3. What are the successive rights of the creditors to satisfy the claims of his debtors?

Answers to Questions:
NEGLIGENCE
Negligence, also known as Culpa, is the failure to observe for the protection of the interests of another person, that degree of care, precaution and vigilance which the circumstances justly demand, whereby such other person suffers injury.
Negligence can also be defined as: The omission of that degree of diligence which is required by the nature of the obligation and corresponding to the circumstances of persons, time and place. (Article 1173 Civil Code) The determination of the existence of negligence is concerned with what the defendant did or did not do. The state of mind of the actor is not important; good faith or use of sound judgment is immaterial. The existence of negligence in a given case is not determined by reference to the personal judgment but by the behavior of the actor in the situation before him. (Picart vs. Smith) Is a conduct that creates an undue risk of harm to others. The determination of negligence is a question of foresight on the part of the actor – FORESEABILITY. Even if a particular injury was not foreseeable, the risk is still foreseeable if possibility of injury is foreseeable. Forseeability involves the question of PROBABILITY, that is, the existence of some real likelihood of some damage and the likelihood is of such appreciable weight reasonably to induce, action to avoid it.

KINDS OF NEGLIGENCE:
1. Culpa Contractual (Contractual Negligence)

Culpa contractual or contractual negligence are negligence in contracts resulting in their breach. It is governed by CC provisions on Obligations and Contracts, particularly Articles: 1170 to 1174 of the Civil Code.

In Culpa Contractual:

The foundation of the liability of the defendant is the contract. In breach of contract committed through the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gng4170 Lecture Notes

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages

    EXAM PREVIEW!!! – Negligence hypothetical question – Given the facts of a case, describe all relevant material covered in the notes, give legal justification and plausible decision.…

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence is defined as “the failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in a similar situation; any conduct that falls below the legal standard established to protect others against unreasonable risk of harm.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1133 (9th ed. 2009) …

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Jones L Introduction to Business Law 1st, 2011, C11 the Tort Law of Negligence. P342…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tasoff Case Summary

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reasonably foreseeable victims were brought to the forefront by cases such as Tarasoff v. the Regents of the University of California and subsequent duty to warn cases. Foreseeable means that a “reasonable anticipation of the possible results of an action” exists (Foreseeability. (n.d.)).…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 week 2 work

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Intentional torts can be described as deliberate acts to harm someone. Negligence can be described to deliberately choose not to act in order to fix a problem which ultimately results in someone being harmed. There are several elements that need to be present in order for a claim to be considered negligence (Melvin, 2011). According to our text these elements need to be present in order to be considered negligence:…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justice Nix, quoting Justice Andrew’s dissent in Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R., 248 N.Y. ,352 argued public policy cannot allow the Defendant to be responsible for every unforeseeable proximate cause that consequently results from of the Defendant’s negligent conduct. Justice Nix admittedly quotes Sinn v.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Causation: Having been part of negligent activity, however not legally responsible under the law…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence is when somebody has a duty of care and that duty is breached. Negligence is split into 3 parts.…

    • 2419 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Larson, A. (2003, October). Negligence and tort law. Retrieved August 21, 2012, from ExpertLaw: http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/negligence.html…

    • 7430 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Policy

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The final element needed to establish negligence requires that there be a close, reasonable, and casual relationship between the defendant’s negligent conduct and the resulting damages suffered by the plaintiff – in other words…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence Paper

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sharfman, B. S. (2006). Being Informed Does Matter: Fine Tuning Gross Negligence Twenty Plus Years After Van Gorkom. Business Lawyer, 62(1), 135-160. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Negligence Paper

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When it comes to negligence there are five items that need to meet to prove that it is a valid negligence case: "1. Duty owed the patient 2. Breach of the duty owed the patient 3. Forseeability 4.Causation 5.Injury 6. Damages" (Guido, 2010, p. 94). There are couple different types of negligence, you can have regular negligence which could be when an individual 's care falls below the standard of care. Then there is gross negligence which is the more serious of the two, and goes beyond just being carelessness. Gross negligence is defined as when an individual deliberately acts in a way that they know would or could cause harm to another individual. An example would be keeping a child in their crib, without changing their diapers or caring for them. This would cause the child to have breakdown of their skin,…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The textbook Fundamentals of Business Law defines negligence as simply an unintentional tort (Miller & Jentz, 2010). As the defendant in a lawsuit alleging negligence, Jason Davis is not in the best position, as he doesn’t have to have malice towards or the intent to harm the plaintiff. Causation of fact is present as well, considering Davis knocked down Esposito and if he hadn’t knocked her down there wouldn’t be an injury, making the act the proximate cause of the injury. A case of negligence requires a causation of fact and proximate cause before it can be brought. The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled the following three factors that indicate whether Davis owed Esposito a duty of care: the likelihood that his conduct will injure others, taken with the seriousness of the injury if it happens, and balanced against the cost of the precaution he must take to avoid the risk. If the product of the likelihood of the injury exceeds the burden of the precautions, the risk is unreasonable and the failure to take precautions is negligence.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Breakdown of Elements

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    2. Negligence is the failure of an ordinary, reasonable, and prudent person to exercise due care, resulting in harm or injury to the plaintiff. Negligence torts do not require intent. Negligence is conduct that falls below the level necessary to protect others against unreasonable risks of harm. To determine if someone should be found liable for a negligence tort, a reasonable person standard is used. If the defendant 's behavior is found to be less careful than behavior a reasonable person would exhibit, that defendant can be found liable for damages.…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays