Preview

Negligence Case

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Negligence Case
. Identify and explain the four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prove a
Negligencecase.
The four elements of proof necessary for negligence to be proved are Duty to protect, Failure to Exercise Reasonable Standard of Care, Proximate Cause and Actual Injury. In a health care setting, Staff and physicians have a duty to protect patients from foreseeable dangers that could lead to injury. They have a duty to make sure equipment is in good working order, so it does not lead to harm. They also have a duty to take preventive measures which create a safer environment. For example, staff have a duty to prevent patients from accidental shock during the use of electronic treatment or diagnostic devices, by making sure they are
…show more content…
Some believe that a “conspiracy of silence” among physicians makes them reluctant to testify against other members of the profession, and if a physician is not a party to the lawsuit, she cannot be forces to testify. Evidence other than expert opinion is admissible in some instances to prove negligence, however, and occasionally even the defendant physician may provide the needed expert testimony.

3. Explain the principle of “vicarious liability” (respondeat superior).
A healthcare provider can be held liable for the negligence of others, even though he has not been personally negligent. This is called vicarious liability, and it is based on the principle of respondeat superior-let the superior respond for the negligence of agents or employees. Thus, physicians and other providers are responsible for the negligent acts of their nurses, paramedics, x-ray technicians, and other persons in their
…show more content…
It is vital for a hospital to perform effectively, to provide quality care, and to maintain a good reputation in the community it serves.
The governing board of a health care corporation is responsible for the “clinical, operational and regulatory issues surrounding quality of care” (Callender,2004). The clinical aspect of the responsibility refers to the care and treatment of patients in a competent manner that is most beneficial to the patient. Operational responsibility refers to the process that are used in providing care. These can include, but are not limited to, electronic records management systems, insurance billing processes, procedures for determining access to electronic record and communications systems used throughout facilities. Operational responsibilities can also include the processes used to determine what equipment should be invested in and whether financial investments are justified. Regulatory responsibilities include ensuring the OSHA guidelines are followed in each department regarding storing handling andusing potentially hazardous chemicals, ensuring that staff in all departments are familiar with and practice reporting of all communicable diseases required to be reported to the CDC and that all facility policies are understood and followed by staff in all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Under the Doctrine of Corporate Negligence the hospital owes certain “duties” directly to the patient, which cannot be delegated to the medical staff. Under the Doctrine of Corporate Negligence Misericordia Community Hospital, owes a duty to its patients to refrain from any act which will cause foreseeable harm to others even though the nature of that harm and identity of the harmed person or harmed interest are unknown at the time of the act (westlaw citation). The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Thompson v. Nason Hospital classified the hospital’s duties into four categories. 1) a duty to use reasonable care in the maintenance of safe and adequate facilities and equipment; 2) a duty to select and retain only competent physicians; 3) a duty to oversee all persons who practice medicine within its walls as to patient care; and 4) a duty to formulate, adopt and enforce adequate rules and policies to ensure quality care for the patients. The hospital also failed to adhere to its own bylaw provisions and to the Wisconsin statues related to medical…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mary is cutting weeds at her home. She is unable to trim some weeds she finds, because they grew between the rocks, so she removes the protective guard on the weed trimmer and trims the weeds. There are no warnings on the weed trimmer advising against removing the guard. She hits a rock, which is thrown to the side, hitting her neighbor in the eye and causing permanent damage. What kind of tort claim does the neighbor have? Who are the possible defendants?…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Economic

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Write a 4-6 page paper based on your answers to the following questions. Utilize the Showalter textbook and at least two (2) other resources to support your answers. Identify and explain the four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prove a negligence case.…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence Case Summary

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Negligence is a failure to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury or loss to another person (Law Hand Book, 2013). Negligence can be used when a party has experienced loss or damage from the wrongful actions or omission to act of another individual. This principal can be found in The Civil Liability Act 2003(Qld). The following report will examine the tort of negligence While analyzing the case study of Mr. Jones vs Blue Board Production and will provide an evaluation to the tort of negligence.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Health care providers have a responsibility to provide competent and safe care to their patients. When patient care is compromised or the patient does not have a successful medical outcome, sometimes the legal system becomes involved. It is important to be aware of the terms negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice because they are often misunderstood. This paper attempts to provide a definition of each legal term in an effort to distinguish the difference between each term Application of negligence and malpractice will be applied through review of a newspaper article entitled, “Amputation mishap; negligence.” Effective documentation leaves no room for liability of the health care provider. After review of this paper, it is hopeful that the reader will feel well informed of the meanings of negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice and how to effectively chart in a patient’s medical record.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personal Injury Claims

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the United States, approximately 31 million injuries that require a doctor's care occur in a year. However, not all of these injuries meet the qualifications for a lawsuit. On the other hand, some of these injuries never make it to trial, even though the injured party has a legal claim they could have made. For people who aren't in the business of practicing law, determining whether or not an injury claim has legal merit is difficult.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second element required to prove negligence is that a duty of care has been breached. To determine whether there has been a breach of duty the question must be asked whether a reasonable person would have foreseen the harm in the circumstances and taken steps to prevent it. The conduct of the defendant is measured against that of a reasonable person in the same circumstances. Special skills, permanent disability or age may alter the test. A council, which is responsible for the maintenance of a river such as the YVCC and where there exists a hidden danger, will owe a duty of care to warn people of foreseeable risks.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Up to the D to prove that the P’s also did not exercise the same reasonable standard of care for the community…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A ‘tort’ is a civil wrong which the law redresses by an award of damages. A ‘wrong’ is an infringement or violation of a person’s legal right by another. There are many torts, each relating to a different type of harm:…

    • 6247 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In principle of vicarious liability, to make an employer liable for a wrong committed by an employee, the plaintiff must establish that:…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tort Law of Negligence

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Torts of negligence are breaches of duty that results to injury to another person to whom the duty breached is owed. Like all other torts, the requirements for this are duty, breach of duty by the defendant, causation and injury(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). However, this form of tort differs from intentional tort as regards the manner the duty is breached. In torts of negligence, duties are breached by negligence and not by intent. Negligence is conduct that falls below the standard of care established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). The standard measure of negligence is the universal reasonable person standard. The assumption in this case is that a reasonable person is never negligent, thus the degree of care required is that of a reasonable person(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). The creation of tort of negligence is a very important tool by which gaps in the law is filled. Often, actions require that some wrongful intent be present in the mind of the actor. However, intent is a difficult thing to prove(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). It is against this background that this paper is structured around four aims. Firstly, it is examines the background of the duty of care .Secondly it studies duty of care for negligent acts historical back ground; doctrine of Reasonable Foresee ability and proximity. Thirdly, the paper will discuss Duty of Care for Negligent advice. Finally, it will analysis. Significantly, this paper will contribute to a developed understanding of three essentials duty of care, standard of care and sufficient connection in law.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To constitute a legal action against some one’s negligence, several requirements to be fulfilled. First one is that there must exist some duty of care towards the plaintiff by the defendant. The second one is that the defendant should breach such duty of care imposed on him. The third one is that the negligence done by the defendant should be the cause of the harm resulted to the plaintiff. The fourth one is that the harm should have some monetary value.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A nurse’s legal responsibility to the patient includes reporting incidents. In the case study where the nurse is called as a witness to a malpractice suit, the nurse failed fulfilled their fundamental duty of patient protection. Initially, upon witnessing negligent care from another nurse, an incident report was immediately filed within the healthcare institution. The nurse also took notes of the negligence the other nurse performed. According to…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligent Advice

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Hedley Byrne principle(Hedley Byrne v Heller & Co Ltd [1964] AC 465), there was a relationship of circumstantial proximity between a professional financial adviser and client, which gave rise to Denise owing Charlie the duty of care because Charlie would rely on Denise with the intention to act on the information or advice given by Denise.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the time before anaesthetic, a good surgeon was a quick surgeon and Robert Liston was a great surgeon. He was reputed to be the fastest in business. He was able to amputate a limb in less than 2½ minutes. Towards the end of his career, he was the first to perform a major operation with ether anaesthesia in European countries. Unfortunately, his mistakes are as startling as his successes. Three of his mistakes are particularly striking. On one occasion, he had an argument with the house surgeon who is arguing that the boy is suffering from aneurysm but not from the pulsatile tumour. To prove his point that the boy that young can’t be suffering from aneurysm of the artery at the neck, he took the surgeon’s knife and lanced it. There was burst of blood from the artery and the boy died. On another occasion, while rapidly amputating the leg, he accidentally removed the patient’s testicles and the patient died. On the third occasion, while removing another patient’s leg, he accidentally slashed through the observing surgeon’s coat tail and slashed his assistant’s fingers. The observing surgeon died of shock, thinking that he had lost his manhood and the…

    • 4019 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays