Preview

Negative Liberty In Canada

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1248 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Negative Liberty In Canada
In 2011, then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government announced a new law, stating that no individual can be permitted to veil their face while taking the citizenship oath. However, in 2015, a federal judge ruled that that law was in violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and abolished it (Isai 2015) while subsequently, candidate Justin Trudeau had expressed his support for that verdict. Albeit that, many Canadian have been expressing their concern that allowing the traditions of ‘an anti-woman’ culture be present at a sacred ceremony that promises to adhere to the free and accepting laws of Canada, would compromise said laws. An overwhelming 93% of Canadian Citizens in a government-funded poll supported the requirement …show more content…
This initially sparked controversy when there was a flurry of reaction to Stephen Harper's remarks on Twitter. The most popular Islamic clothing is a hijab that covers the head-and-shoulders; piece of cloth that covers the face, and the niqab that covers the entire face with the exception of few countries like Saudi Arabia where it is the law to wear the niqab. However, it is entirely up to Muslim women whether they choose to wear it or not. This situation is best described according to Isaiah Berlin’s “two concepts of liberty” (Swift 2014, 58-60).
These two concepts of Liberty are: negative Liberty and positive liberty. Negative liberty can be defined as the freedom from outside interference. Whereas, positive Liberty is the freedom to act upon one's will. The distinction between these two concepts is freedom from something and freedom to be able to do something (Swift 2014, 58-60). So, for instance, in the language of negative Liberty with regards to what Harper stated, one might say, yes, I will abide to the Canadian laws and respect its cultural values. But at the same time falling victim or feeling as though they are being labelled and oppressed by society, thereby
…show more content…
The niqab is very rare in Canada with a smaller estimate of women on average adorning it. Which is why Harper's comments upset a national Muslim group that says it's a woman's right to make that choice, whether you choose to wear the niqab or not it is a woman’s choice at the end of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Anne Applebaum’s "Veiled Insult" first appeared in the Washington Post in 2006. In this essay, Applebaum aims to convince her readers that it is disrespectful for Muslim women to wear their headscarves or niqabs (full bodied cloak) in our western society, just as it is disrespectful for our women to go to their society uncloaked. In delivering her message she also brings to attention the political issue of whether or not it is religious discrimination to allow, or not allow muslim women to wear their cloaks, and in the end she gives us her opinion, “it isn’t religious discrimination or anti-Muslim bias to tell her that she must be polite to the natives, respect the local customs, try to speak some of the local patois -- and uncover her face.” Applebaum uses her personal experiences combined with her American worldview to convince her readers (the American public) that for Muslim women to wear their cloaks in American culture is disrespectful and insensitive. Although those techniques may have worked, her strongest argument is perhaps playing on the emotions of the still sensitive and emotionally scarred, post 9/11…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naheed Mustafa, a young Muslim who began to wear the hijab once she blossomed out of her teenage years, finds it difficult to apprehend the fact as to why society views her differently compared to other girls her age. Due to the mere fact that she wears a hijab, she gets a “whole gamut of strange looks, stares, and covert glances.” Because she lives in Canada, which adapts the Western culture, wearing a hijab is not very common. Because of this Naheed and many others like her, are often viewed as outcasts and treated differently. This takes a huge toll on one’s identity which can be either negative or positive. However, Naheed abides by her choices and wishes to make a positive change out of it.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Garments were arranged to display the patterns and quality of fabrics on all layers and add bulk to the body image. The more former the occasion or higher the status of the weaver, the more layers worn, with richer materials further indicating wealth.” Explained in Charlotte Jirousek article Islamic Clothing. Wearing the hijab was crucial while in public due to the exposer of the body. Any woman that was unveiled was viewed by men as a naked woman. Women should be covered to protect what is considered the men’s property at all times unless around immediate family in their homes. That is why “Women wear the Hijab around strangers (especially males) that they do not consider as part of their family. It is believed that this lessens the chance of them having bad thoughts about them, this includes sexual desires. They believe that the external part of a person is not important but what it inside.” Said in the article Why Do Woman Wear Hijab, Maureen. Women started to adapt to their cultural upbringings, they believed this was a way to keep themselves treasured. Some Islamic woman seen no harm in this, they didn’t feel as if the men dominated them, or were obeying them as their property. They felt as if all women should feel the need to be veiled so they’re not perceived as just a sex object. They would like men to be attentive to their personalities and mind not their looks. Today, women have more of a choice to be veiled. There are a lot of women who use the hijab and not the gown due to the evolving changes in fashion and liberal few points. They feel that it denies the women the freedom to decide on their own…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Quebec Charter of Values

    • 2189 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The topic of this essay concerns the current proposed law in Quebec regarding the ban on people wearing and displaying religious symbols in government, publicly funded institutions and places of work by the people employed at said places. The Provence of Quebec, governed at this time by the Parti Quebecois, has put forth Bill 60, named the Quebec Charter of Values. Essentially Bill 60 will restrict the wearing or displaying of all religious symbols by people who are attending school or working in the public sector. For example, if a Muslim nurse wearing a hijab was employed at a hospital in the province, she would be required to take off her hijab and any other visible religious symbols before she entered the hospital to start her shift. The bill would apply to judges, police, prosecutors, public daycare workers, teachers, school employees, hospital workers and municipal personnel. The government of Quebec states that; “The purpose of this bill is to establish a Charter affirming the values of State secularism and religious neutrality and of equality between women and men, and providing a framework for…

    • 2189 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, we also been conditioned to believe that a veiled woman is an oppressed woman. In truth women choose to wear or not wear their veils out of religious piety and social preference. These veils can also be used as a “tool of resistance” (Sensoy and Marshall, 124) “Women of Afghanistan documented the Taliban’s crimes against girls and women by hiding video cameras under their burqas and transformed the burqa from simply a marker of oppression to a tool of…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other types of head coverings that are the most recognizable include the niqab and the burqa. Both of these coverings completely conceal the hair and portions of the face but are slightly different. The burqa is recognized as a symbol of Islam around the world and wrongly associated with fundamentalist Muslim governments. A burqa is a garment that covers the body, head, and face. The wearer is able to see through a mesh panel in front of the face, but the fabric is thick enough that outside viewers cannot see the wearer’s face. The niqab is similar to the burqa because it conceals the head and body, but instead of a mesh panel in front of the face, there is a small slit that reveals the wearer’s eyes while the rest of the face is hidden by another piece of fabric. Although burqas have been required by some past extremist governments, they should not continue to be symbols of negativity for Muslim women. In order for the negative stereotypes involving Muslim head coverings to disappear, French society must understand that all Muslims do not represent terror groups or the fundamentalist side of the…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, 1928, The Supreme Court of Canada commands that "all women are not to be considered citizens under the law". 1942, Japanese Canadians had their properties taken away and they were transferred to internment camps. In 1960, Aboriginal women lost their Indian rank if they married non-Aboriginal men. However, since the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom has been introduced it has granted quality without discrimination on basis of, race, National or Ethnic origin, color, Religion, sex, Age, Mental or physical ability. Therefore, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has proven itself as a vital part of Canada's constitution, especially since we are a multicultural country.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All the laws in Canada must be consistent with it. Therefore, the government of Canada and the provincial governments are required to comply with it and to protect the fundamental rights of Canadians.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    e Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, patriated in 1982, is arguably the most fundamental base of law that exists in Canada. Section 2 of the Charter, also known as the Fundamental Freedoms, is a crucial part of the Charter because it protects citizens and gives them the freedom to follow and practice their own religion, have their own beliefs and opinions, express themselves as they wish and gather in peaceful assemblies (Jobb). Section 2(b) of the Charter, also known as the “freedom of expression”, states that Canadians have the “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication” (Class Note, Al-Hassani, 10/10/2014). This freedom is crucial in a democratic society because…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With another outrage that happened not too long ago with Muslim women in Australia wearing their religious significance – the Burqa which is an outer garment worn in public covering majority of their bodies.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious Current Events

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This will likely become an extremely controversial situation between the people of Quebec City and their governing party, the reason being that before this charter, the people were free to openly practice and somewhat display their beliefs, and now, are being regulated on what they are and aren’t allowed to wear. Though the drafters of the bill feel that this charter is required to achieve religious neutrality, it is not likely that the people of Quebec City will stand for such religious oppression. Some may be tolerable of the charter, like those who can just tuck in their necklaces or put away their rings, but what about those who wear garments such as headdresses and celebrative wear to express their strength and belief, or even a monk who is only to wear his robe. To set any regulation on religious “display” is to oppress religion itself. It is impossible to ban the "visual expression" of religion without inadvertantly discriminating against certain religious perspectives…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2010, the controversial Bill 94 was introduced in Quebec. The bill would prohibit women wearing the niqab from accessing any public service and would allow them to be denied access to schools, non-emergency healthcare, daycare facilities, courtrooms and more. Furthermore, government employees would be banned from wearing the niqab to work. The Quebec government is petitioning to ban the niqab because they claim it is a symbol of oppression, that women only wear if forced by a male, and that their needs to be a law to protect women from being oppressed by male relatives. However, many women who choose to wear the niqab who have spoken to the media that what they wear was in fact their choice, (Reynolds, 2010). While only approximately 100…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To reiterate, the burqa is a long and loose piece of clothing worn by Muslim women, which covers their bodies from head to toe, in some cases including the eyes. The Burqa was mainly worn in the Middle East to symbolize that a woman was married, so other men couldn’t look at them in sexual ways. The Burqa is sometimes confused with the hijab. The hijab is a scarf that covers a woman’s head to chest, unlike the Burqa covering the whole body. The banning of the burqa in public is a very delinquent situation because it fights for the safety of individuals over morality and ethics since it can be used as a disguise but also an Islamic tradition for women to wear from exposing themselves to other males besides their husbands or fathers, but there is so much law reform can do since there is a big debate about whether the burqa should or should not be banned since it will destroy the…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedoms, rights, and responsibilities are similar in the sense that all three are things that every citizen of Canada has.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the Affordable Care Act became law, it resulted in the unintended consequence of conflicting with the religious beliefs of some business owners. Part of the law requires employer paid insurance that supplies contraception to the employee. These religious business owners believe forcing them to pay for contraception is a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Treating all citizens equally is different than forcing individual citizens to violate their religious beliefs. This has become an argument of Positive Liberty Verses Negative Liberty. Negative Liberty is freedom from someone else hindering your liberty. Positive Liberty is the ability to act on your freedom. The ACLU claims that those exercising their religious beliefs…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays