But understanding the original marital patterns of the Tiwi was very important to how the social, political and economic system of the Tiwi worked. Traditional culture mandated that all women be married, this belief was more extreme than the tribes of the mainland. Mainland tribe believed marriage was expected but not necessarily required and not set for the baby girl before birth. The Tiwi believed that there was no such thing as an unmarried female they don’t even have a word in their language to describe the concept of an unmarried female. Since, they believe that the woman gets pregnant because a spirit enters her body and a man really doesn’t play a part in the actual conception of the baby they took it a step further. By betrothing every female even before birth-every child would be assured a father. Also, after a woman has been married and her husband dies she has to sit at his gravesite until she is married…
By the Gupta era child marriage was common, girls were 8 or 9, men were in 20s. – encouraged them to devote their lives to their family.…
Marriage in the Hopi tribe was essential to the existence of the tribe. The Hopis couldn't marry anyone from their own clan. When a women got married she had a reed suitcase that she kept the dress in after the marriage ceremony. The groom's closest…
The Vedas says that a womans primary duty is to help her husband in duties and contiune his family tradition, like passing down a family bussiness. Mainly, a wife's primary job is to have babies and stay home with them.Wifes to men were like servants. Men have the right to marry more woman or have mistresses. But men have to treat them equally like having the same size house. Yet it was aginast the law that woman can not meet any men that was not realated to her without a family member with her. All people rather they are christian or not are equal. Men are not treated any higher nor lower than a female. They were equal. Once your married to a man you stay with him. He or she must not cheat on each other nor sepperate.…
When men marry, they move away to live with their wife’s family, although they return frequently to take part in family activities, in this way renewing lineage ties frequently. Women of the village never leave.…
It “constructs alliances between families, lineages, and clans” (166). Those alliances strengthen and bolster the people. The process is far less sinister and archaic than Hollywood would lead the world to believe. There is a lengthy process in which “the young Indians play a greater part in…than they used to” (167). The custom has changed with the culture itself. Young women search for information about prospective husbands. Young men pay visits to women to discover more about them. The parents meet, searching for more than just a good bride price. The whole process begins early essentially to protect the children from themselves. Teenagers choose unsuitable partners and make rash decisions. Unplanned pregnancy is tough in American culture when the couple is adults. Teenagers who are destined to be arranged to another would struggle much more. Both the families and the prospective spouses are scrutinized. Everything from reputation to temperament is taken into account when arranging a marriage. Even the ancestors are compared to ensure no mixing of blood occurs. The entire process is thorough and selective. The family chosen will become part of the lineage, a good one must be chosen for the sake of the child and the family.…
Gender roles and the status of men and women is a part of the social and cultural continuity and change among India. Men in India are frequently recognized to be more superior to the women. Gender roles within India are considered to be backwards in contrast to many westernised societies. Women are often to be seen as a nurturer and less educated than men. Once the women become married their main role in life will be to devote their lives to her husband and care for the children. Traditional beliefs recognise the father as being dominant within the home, and it is still thought today that this is the way of life. The women are still frequently unnoticed for their running of the household in the Indian society, due to traditional family roles of India; their joy in life comes from seeing it in their husband.…
There have been many studies about gender roles in a marriage. The wife seems to do a lot. Women feel sometimes they do too much. Married couples should be able to work together. Sometime when the wife does everything it puts a constraint on the marriage. A marriage not only needs to survive, but thrive. In a marriage a husband and wife should be able share the same roles as needed. Society has a perceived notion of this. Everything today in a marriage should be able to be shifted back and forth as needed. This is all evidence that a marriage should be between two people who are willing to share all family responsibilities. It is a married couple’s responsibility to take control of any major problems they may have prior to marriage if possible.…
Nectar in a Sieve shows the impact of modernization on rural India through the story of Rukmani and her husband Nathan, and their struggle with the change that happened all around them, yet seemed to leave them behind. The book shows the effect that change had on their family, their village, and how it shaped their lives. Modernization played a significant role and had a big impact on family life, social and class division, and the land in rural India.…
Nectar in Sieve is biased on Rukmani, a woman from a village in India that has to deal with many different struggles throughout her life. She is forced to marry young because of her family’s poorness and then continues to struggle with financial and personal issues throughout her life. Rukmani is a very interesting character; she seems to be quite brave women for the times she lived. She has had major issues to deal with, such as making sure her children had enough food, helping her daughter find a husband. I can imagine during these times that the problems that a women like Rukmani faced are similar and in the other hand completely different to what women today go through.…
Historically, the respective roles of a man and a woman in marriage are different across religious, cultures, and political borders. Even today, different sectors of society have distinctly different guidelines and expectations for the husband-wife relationship. Often what sets apart some societies from others when it comes to marriage is the role that women are allowed to have in the relationship. For centuries, and even in parts of the world today, marriage was treated as a sacred bond, but one in which the woman must honor and serve the man. This was clear in early Eurasia, where society viewed marriage as a way to enforce women's subordination.…
Niranjan, S.; Sureender, S. and Rao, G. Rama. : Family Structure in India Evidence from NFHS. Demography India. 27(2). 1998. P. 287-300. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Family Structure in India - Evidence from NFHS S. Niranjan, S. Sureenderand G. Rama Rao Introduction With the increase in the urbanization and industrialization, the concept of family in India, which once was to create and maintain a common culture among the members of the family, is undergoing changes. However according to Beteille (1964), inspite of socio-economic and political changes, family life and family structure have remained as an integral part of Indian society with the 'spirit of family solidarity ' as the sustaining power. Ross (1961) found that many Indians went through changes in the type of family in which they lived in various sequences: large joint family, small joint family, nuclear family, and nuclear family with dependants. D 'Souza (1971) argues that, the Indian family has been subjected to stress and strain, and inspite of resistance to change over the centuries, is slowly undergoing a process of change significantly. According to Cohen (1981) "households have reputedly been shrinking in size for ten thousand years or more, right up to the present, and this is a result of an evolving technology that requires fewer co-operating people to secure food, rear children, and look after the sick". Though it is generally felt that joint families, whose members were bound together by ties of common ancestry and common property dominate in the past, there are diverging views regarding the same. Gore (1968) says, "the fraternal or collateral joint family was never the most common form". Goode (1968) asserts that the large joint family was not common at any time in India perhaps because of the great forces of fission, initially between daughters-in-law and later between brothers. In a study of three villages…
The BJP believes that economic progress should not be at the cost of family values. The family…
India is a deeply religious country, housing abundant religions within itself and the most dominant of them is Hinduism. The caste system is also prevalent in India. In combination with the forces of industrialization, modernization and urbanization, there is some evidence that caste groups are now serving more as a way for people to assert their cultural identity rather than as a way of establishing their place in the social hierarchy. The family is the basic unit of India’s social order with designated roles for both men and women. Partners are usually found from within the same caste, religion, or social class/status group, making India’s culture high on the dimension of in-group collectivism. Although the employment and status of women has been changing due to the forces of modernization and industrialization and due to the efforts of the women’s movement in India, this change has been slow.…
A woman of any class has had a role in their family household and in their marriage. As a daughter, obey your father; once married, obey your husband: when widowed, obey your son. Buddhist culture states: “Onna sanga ni ie nashi” (Women have no home in the three realms of inexistence; the past, present and future) [Minamoto; 1990, 1997: Ogishi 1990: Okano, 1995] A man could divorce his wife and send her back to her parents simply saying that she is unhealthy or unable to bear a child. The mother had taught her daughters to read and write and how to dress for ceremonial occasions. (See Fig. 1.1)…