Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Necessity for Nuclear Weapons

Satisfactory Essays
489 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Necessity for Nuclear Weapons
The Necessity of Nuclear Power

As time goes by and the world becomes more advanced technologically, we develop a greater need for energy sources. Most of the fuels that we use today are non-renewable, such as coal and oil. Nuclear power is a source of power which brings many benefits. It is less expensive because it is based on uranium, which is easily accessible. With very little amounts of uranium, great amounts of energy can be produced.
A significant advantage is that by producing energy using nuclear power, the process does not give off Greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide which contribute to the rising problem of Global Warming. One of the biggest advantages of nuclear power is the discoveries made in nuclear medicine, such as CAT scan, cancer therapy and MRI machines. Nuclear power has become more useful in the past century with the inventions of nuclear weapons. The invention of atomic bombs, hydrogen bombs and other weapons of mass destruction has given nations more power and source of safety.
A single weapon can be capable of destroying a whole city. Nuclear weapons have only been used twice in history, both during the closing events of the Second World War in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is a wise decision to possess nuclear weapons if you are a wealthy nation with power. If a nation feels threatened at any time, it can depend on these weapons to protect themselves from the enemy.
Nuclear power has disadvantages as well. If any accidents were to occur, many people can be fatally injured. Nuclear plants are only reliable to a certain extent. In reality, if any accident were to happen, a whole city can be expected to evacuate. One major disadvantage of nuclear power is that is creates significant amounts of radioactive waste. This waste causes problems for the world because of its high radiation. The waste remains for hundreds of years and creates high temperatures.
Although nuclear power does have disadvantages, I believe that it necessary as long as it is used in the correct manner. The fossil fuels used for energy today are not an infinite resource. Someday, humans may need to rely on different sources of power and energy for consumption. Without the proper source of energy, our world would stop because people would not know how to react to the shortage of resources. In nuclear power and the production of energy can be handled correctly, a possibility of an accident is relatively rare.
Nuclear power can be a good substitute for the burning of fossil fuels for energy. The manufacturing of weapons of mass destruction is also beneficial to the well-being of nations and the people. If any disputes that led to war were to occur, countries have the ability to protect themselves if need be. Knowing the fact that multiple nations may be in possession of such weapons, decreases the likelihood of severe combat.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power plants do not release harmful carbon dioxide into the environment like the fossil fuels that are mostly used. Therefore, it can actually help with the problem of global warming around the world and even here. Nuclear power plants are also considered more reliable since they do not depend on the wind or the sun in order to produce energy. This means that nuclear energy can provide a more reliable base load of energy even when the demand for energy is very high like during the summer months when everyone is using their air conditioners.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A nuclear weapon is a weapon that gets it’s destructive power by turning matter into energy. All nuclear weapons are explosives(usually missiles).They can be transported by missiles, bombs,tank shells,mines, or torpedoes. The most destructive nuclear weapons are far more poweful than any conventional(non nuclear) weapon. A nuclear weapon used in a large city could kill millions of people. A large nuclear war could devastate the Earth’s climate and ability to support life(a.k.a nuclear winter).…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people think that nuclear power can provide low-cost energy which can easily substitute oil and the other common sources of energy. In addition to this, nuclear weapons are considered the only instrument which can make possible the maintenance of word peace. The nuclear problem is complex and difficult to analyze without any kind of prejudices. First of all, it is true that nuclear power can provide a huge amount of energy to every city in the world, but we also should consider…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The ongoing debate of whether or not nuclear weapons are obsolete or not is a very complex one. Numerous studies have purported that nuclear weapons no longer serve an important strategic purpose for countries such as the United States of America and Great Britain. Clausewitz stated that war and politics were inextricably linked. So the distinction between “political” and “military” viability of nuclear weapons is one without meaning. Essentially this implies that deterrence theory still works, at least between state actors. After all, no nuclear power has ever been attacked by another state, and the same can’t be said about attacks by nuclear powers on non-nuclear states. Although until ‘Global Zero’ (which is the campaign to eliminate nuclear weapons from the earth) has reached their goal, one would find it hard to say for certain that nuclear weapons were strategically obsolete. The fact that deterrence theory has worked so far does not mean it is always going to work. As Robert McNamara said after the Cold War ‘it was luck that prevented the cold war’ not deterrence theory. McNamara carries on to emphasize how ‘rational individuals came “that” close to total destruction of their societies… a hair’s breath away.’ With this statement in mind one must look favorably on the viewpoint that nuclear weapons are not strategically obsolete whilst they are still accessible, because human judgment will always play a part.…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    With nuclear power came what was thought to be a more clean alternative to burning coal and other fossil fuels; Nuclear power does not produce nearly as much of the greenhouse gases as coal produces. People and society have given nuclear power a bad name, considering the amount of accidents that have happened. Although when you look at statistics it’s not as many as you would believe, or expect. When nuclear power is put head to head with coal power, nuclear power is the more efficient, and the safest way of power production. There are several reasons for this like the amount of fuel burned, pollution levels, and the effect it has on the environment.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It allowed for countries to take out other countries without putting American soldiers at risk; this way, American casualties were minimized by not putting them in the line of fire. As stated in a memorandum to the secretary of war, “The main-point of this memorandum is the predominating importance of considering the use of nuclear bombs as a problem of long-range policy rather than for its military advantage in this war. Their use should thus be directed primarily toward bringing about some international control of the means of nuclear warfare” (Compton). Here is a perfect example at how the United States could use the nuclear weapon for a variety of usages. It was used a method of control in the military. By using the atomic weapon control could be gained from the opposing country through…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, one could produce an equally valid argument against the use of nuclear deterrence. While nuclear deterrence helps with reducing the chance of nuclear war, it is by no means a guaranteed barrier. It is easily seen that nuclear weapons hold the potential for the loss of innocent life; around 150,000 were lost in the U.S. attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In addition to the loss of life, the loss of large sums of government money is a second argument against nuclear deterrence. It is estimated that between 1940 and 2000, $5.5 trillion were spent on nuclear weapons programs, and nearly $350 billion is estimated to be spent in the next ten years. It can easily be argued this money would be better spent on government projects…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear weapons have only ever been used once in human history, and that was during World War II when The United States deployed missiles on Japanese territory, in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. At the time of bombing in 1945 only the USA had developed nuclear weapons, whilst today the pool of states consisting of nuclear weapons is still extremely small, with only nine states laying claim to nuclear technology and weaponry. This nuclear proliferation is explained by Darryl Howlett who explains this as the worldwide spread of nuclear weapons. For Howlett states are nuclear driven because of the ‘strategic, political and prestige benefits’ attached to nuclear weapons[1]. In the modern world the mass media are often critical about nuclear weapons and the threats they pose for society, but this begs the question; why have nuclear weapons not been used in conflict since 1945? To answer this question the issues of taboo and deterrence and the arrival of virtual nuclear arsenals must be called into question, as well as theoretical ideas such as rationality from proliferation optimists and proliferation pessimists. I will also look at whether we currently live in a non-proliferation regime, and look at the alternatives for peace and nuclear non-usage.…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Energy Exploration

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nuclear energy can be very dangerous but can also be cleaner than other energy sources by creating less pollution than fossil fuels. It is an advanced form of energy that has only been available for the past 50 years. It is very similar to fossil fuel in that it uses steam turbines to produce electricity. It uses uranium to produce heat in a process called nuclear fission where neutrons are smashed into the nucleus of atoms splitting them and releasing heat energy.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With all these pros, there are still cons about nuclear energy. Nuclear power plants generate large amounts of highly radioactive material. This is from the leftovers, after splitting the uranium atom. You can argue that nuclear waste is a bad thing, but if it is taken care of properly it is not so bad. The highly radioactive rods are kept in cooling pools of water, which not only cools the rods down, but…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Power is reliable yet controversial source of energy in the U.S. Many people have different viewpoints on Nuclear energy. Although nuclear energy can cause many problems such as nuclear accidents, it saves money, produces less pollution, and it can be made in any environment. The benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the risks. Without nuclear energy we would be relying on the weather for energy.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The natural resources of this world have diminished at a rapid rate in recent years. Resources such as water and fossil fuel have become almost extinct. This has led to people seeking alternative ways to generate electricity. One unique way out of this energy crisis seems to be "nuclear energy." The science of nuclear fission and atomic radiation was developed between 1895 and 1945; much of that development was focused on the atomic bomb. Then, in 1945, attention shifted to harnessing this energy for making electricity. Uranium was first discovered in 1789 by a German Chemist, and the first commercial nuclear power station started operations in the 1950's in Russia. Following series of laboratory experiments, fission was found to not only release energy but also…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    hey are perhaps the most powerful forces that man has ever wielded. Other countries that possess known nuclear capabilities are the United Kingdom, France, the People 's Republic of China, Pakistan, and India. When first developed, nuclear weapons were completely strategic weapons. That is, they were not designed to destroy enemy weaponry; they were designed to destroy entire cities. However, there are now small, tactical nuclear weapons in addition to the others. Besides how powerful a nuclear weapon is, there are other differences between them. They can be either a fusion or a fission device, and they can be dropped from an airplane, fired from an artillery gun, or attached to various types of rockets.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Only two nuclear weapons were actually used during war, the two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on the Sixth and Ninth of August 1945. The loss of life was enormous, as even the Americans did not know the full effect of these weapons of mass destruction. There are still people dying from radiation related diseases as a result of these nuclear weapons dropped over 50 years ago. These bombs are of relatively low yield compared to the weapons of today. At around 20 kilotons each, these weapons levelled two cities. The most powerful modern weapons are around 20 megatons, and can start fires in dry paper, leaves, and grass up to 100 kilometers away from the center of the blast.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays