Preview

Nazi Foreign Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
781 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nazi Foreign Policy
Germany 1919-1939 Essay
2012 HSC Question –“ How successful was Nazi foreign policy in achieving its aims to September 1939?”
Following the Nazi rise to power, Adolf Hitler’s regime conducted, and to a certain degree implemented a foreign policy that aimed for the incorporation of all Germanic speaking peoples into the Reich (Volksgemeinschaft); German domination of Western Europe; and the attainment of vast areas of living space (lebensraum) for the greater good of the volk. While the Nazis experienced great success in their plight for German hegemony in Europe, they ultimately fell short in achieving these aims as is abundantly clear in the collapse of the Third Reich in 1945.
Nazi foreign policy was inherently nationalistic and expansionistic, and as Hitler calculated, German hegemony in Europe would require war, especially in Eastern Europe. In the words of Carl von Clausewitz “war is simply the continuation of policy by other means”; this would prove the case for Hitler as the final step of his foreign policy up until 1939 involved the invasion and occupation of Poland. Moving and preparing the ‘Wehrmacht’ into action was a process of several years and was inextricably linked to other elements of foreign policy. Nazi withdrawal from the “League of Nations” and “Geneva Disarmament Conference” in 1933 made it abundantly clear that multilateralism played no role in Nazi foreign policy. Rearmament peaked in the years of 1933-1936, with the Nazi war timetable being actualised in the reoccupation of the Rhineland in 1936. Nazi foreign policy to this degree, suffered no real hiccups thanks not to the proficiency and aggression of Hitler, but to the inaction of Allied powers in their appeasement policies towards Germany. The remilitarisation of the Rhineland and the passive reaction from the international community could be seen as a success for Nazi foreign policy as it not only put Germany into a greater position of power, but also proved the flexibility of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Due to the failure of the Weimar Republic and general public dissatisfaction arising from poor economic conditions exacerbated by the Treaty of Versailles, coupled with the 1929 Wall Street Crash, German citizens were understandably desperate for change. Until this point in time the Nazi party, and Hitler, had been essentially unpopular. However, the economic situation ensured Hitler’s increasing popularity as the people looked toward more extreme but non-communist ideals. The initial consolidation of Nazi power in 1933 arose from key events such as the support of the Nationalist Party with the Nazis to form a coalition government, implementation of the Enabling Law, removal of external and internal opposition, and President Hindenburg’s death.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Weimar republic was introduced on the back of Germany’s defeat at WWI, the resignation of Kaiser Wilhelm II and the widely despised signature of the Treaty of Versailles. These conditions led to its collapse in 1933, and also the great rise in popularity for the Nazi party during this period. There is no doubt that a number of economic factors played a crucial role in the collapse of the Weimar republic and the rise of the Nazis, however, numerous other factors also played a part. Some historians consider a lack of effective opposition a major contributing in the expansion of the Nazis. It has also been argued that the appeal of the Nazi party won them many votes. Finally, the impact of other political factors cannot be ignored when considering this issue.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Working to the Fuhrer

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The coined term “working towards the Fuhrer” helps shed light in understanding Hitler’s style of rule. “Working towards the Fuhrer” existed because of Hitler’s highly personalized style of rule. He rarely held cabinet meetings, met with cabinet members alone and disregarded customary governmental procedures. 2 Kershaw further explains the connection between “working towards the Fuhrer” and his rule, “Hitler’s sparse involvement in initiating domestic policy during the mid- and later 1930s and the disintegration of any centralized body for policy formulation means that were was wide scope for those able to exert pressure for action in areas broadly echoing the aims of nationalization of the masses.” 3 Due to Hitler’s disengagement from internal affairs, it opened the doors for party followers to carry out his aims to accomplish presumed party goals. Hitler’s style of rule that invited radical initiatives from below (“working towards the Fuhrer”, had substantial effects on both German society and the Nazi Regime during the 1930s.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early twentieth century the Nazi party (NSDAP) was a small extremist party renowned for it's use of violence and its beliefs such as anti-Semitism and anti-marxism. The party believed that the treaty of Versailles was wrong and unfair thus needed opposing; this was done through a military coup that ultimately failed due to a lack of support. However between 1930 and 1933 the fortunes of the Nazi party completely changed, this transformation was not only due to Hitler’s talents as a politician but also his personality, the use of propaganda, political manoeuvring, the change in support and the use of the SA and violence.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    q. Failure of appeasement, Munich: This marks the end of creating an international policy. Hitler went through a series of marches with no opposition. Appeasement is the idea of giving someone what they wants to get them to shut up, even though it isn’t good for them. The Munich Conference Hitler lies and promises that the expansion was over. Hitler’s book, Mein Kampf explained he was going to continue…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The instalment of Adolf Hitler as Chancellor, the ever continuing rise of Nazism and the final fall of the Weimar Republic. Events of 1933 in Germany through which the birth of the Third Reich was to begin, National Socialism implemented through Gleichschaltung and Hitler’s Weltanschauung would be a reality. A pivotal year indeed, through which The Nazi Party was able to legally gain control of government and wipe away all traces of the Weimar Republic, a move based not only on political promise but also on securing the base of Hitler’s new Germany from the ailments that affected the Weimar Republic. A system that Hitler not only despised but understood to be fundamentally weak. While Hitler was only one of many enemies and adversaries of the Republic, Hitler’s success was by no means based solely on either the faults of the Republic or on the prowess of his Nazi Party to overcome other competing forces for German government. It shall also be stated that though all the faults within the Weimar Republic were not directly an advantage to the Nazi Party, they still lead to an overall situation in which any problems the Weimar faced, the Nazis could view as an advantage. Herewith it will be shown that Hitler’s image and the belief in Nazi action which rallied many Germans to his Party over others in the final years of Weimar, highlighted an important fact. That is, the rise of the Nazi’s relied on the circumstances that it could exploit and the ability of the leaders to succeed in furthering their gains from these failings which ailed the Republic politically, socially and economically.…

    • 2486 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Hitler’s power began to rise during the 30s, many Americans still believed that they could avoid the issue through a policy of appeasement (Document G), though it failed and both Britain and France…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adolf Hitler in his proclamation dated February 1, 1933 made it apparent to the German people that they rightfully and with good intention “…entered the fight in 1914 without the slightest feeling of guilt on its part and filled only with the desire to defend the Fatherland…” (Hitler, 1933 p. 1). Yet, after their defeat and because of broken promises perpetrated by the Western leaders the reparations that were forced upon all of Germany not only affected them as individually, but also the entire nation in an adverse way. Furthermore, the demands placed upon Germany had altered global trade balance. It was Hitler’s belief that, Germany suffered under an oppressive state of being for “Fourteen years of Marxism have ruined Germany; one year of…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hitler ultimately wanted to establish a New Order of absolute Nazi German hegemony in Europe. To achieve this, he pursued a foreign policy with the declared goal of seizing Lebensraum ("living space") for the Aryan people; directing the resources of the state towards this goal. This included the rearmament of Germany, which was utilized in 1939 when Nazi Germany invaded Poland. In response, the United Kingdom and France declared war against Germany, leading to the outbreak of World War II in Europe. There are many forms of hegemonic internationalism and Nazi Germany pursued this by the most obvious way possible: by invading them for the “good of Germany”. This solidifies the belief that hegemonic internationalism is, in reality, one nation pursuing its own national interests at the expense of another nation. Hitler did what he believed would make Germany “better” regardless of what other nations national interests were. One of the main Nazi ideologies was that the Jewish people were the main cause of their problems. Hitler, using the policy of hegemonic internationalism; as he was invading the continent of Europe, rounded up 6 million Jews and had them killed in concentration camps. This is the worst case and the most extreme outcome of hegemonic internationalism, in which 6 million people died because one nation thought that it was for the good of their national interests.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the impact of World War One took its toll on Europe countries like Russia, Italy and Germany were in dire need of a change. Germany was most impacted by the war and was left in a state where everyday citizens were homeless, jobless, and starving. Looking for someone save Germany, Germans were in a desperate need for change and turned to group of radicals that were rising in power at a rapid rate known as the Nazis. Looking for someone to “save Germany” the Nazi’s unconventional but radical beliefs gave many Germans a strong sense of hope. “One of the reasons the Nazi ideology was so successful in eliciting support for the party and consensus behind its program was that its structure was built central concepts that, in the…

    • 3069 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Racial Policy

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nazism can be regarded as the most destructive force of the 20th century in part due to the sinister implications of Nazi racial policy on civilians amidst the European war. Essentially, the impact of Nazi race ideology was most adversely felt by the Jewish people as generations of Jews in both Germany and Nazi occupied territories were subjected to denationalization and subsequently mass-exodus under the banner of aryanisation and the policy of Lebensraum. Moreover, this form of race policy inclusive of the Nazi belief in the establishment of Herrenvolk or a master race is what led to the Holocaust, claiming the lives of more than 6 million Jews. Yet, the impact of Nazi racial policy did not only extend towards extermination but also forced upon a state of…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor on January 30 1933 to the beginning of WWII on Sept 3 1939, the Nazi state pursued an aggressive foreign policy that contributed largely to the outbreak of war. This foreign policy was largely reflective of the goals Hitler had set out in his 1924 autobiography “Mein Kampf”, particularly Germany’s easterly moving aggressions. However, although Nazi ideology played a dominant role in structuring foreign policy to 1939, it was also greatly influenced by the response of the Allies to aggressions and therefore Hitler’s perception of which foreign policies could be most successful. Hence, whilst Nazi ideology surmises the ultimate goals of Nazi foreign policy to 1939, the role of events from 1933-1939 played a significant detail in determining Germany’s actions.…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lebensraum and Autarky showed the intense Nationalism and Expansionism of the Nazi party. Combined, the policies show the Nazi beliefs that all Germans should have living space by expanding into non German countries and that Germany should be completely self sufficient. These policies also highlight the extreme Racism which was a key element in Nazism. The idea that Aryans were the master race and minorities were subhuman and were sent to concentration camps. Nazism however was most known for its Totalitarianism which allowed the Nazis to control all aspects of German society.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Policies

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Describe the way the Nazi government set about providing jobs for the unemployed in Germany after 1933.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why did disarmament fail?

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In February 1932 the long-promised Disarmament Conference finally got under way. By July 1932 it had produced resolutions to prohibit bombing of civilian populations, limit the size of artillery, limit the tonnage of tanks, and prohibit chemical warfare. But there was very little in the resolutions to show how these limits would be achieved. It was not a promising start. However, there was a bigger problem facing the Conference – what to do about Germany. The Germans had been in the League for six years. Most people now accepted that they should be treated more equally than under the Treaty of Versailles. The big question was whether everyone else should disarm to the level that Germany had been forced to, or whether the Germans should be allowed to rearm to a level closer to that of other powers.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics