Preview

Naturalistic Fallacy Examples

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
122 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Naturalistic Fallacy Examples
The fallacy of the second supposed implication of a human nature – that if our ignoble motives are innate, they can’t be so bad after all – is so obvious it has been given a name: the naturalistic fallacy, that what happens in nature is right.
Forget the romantic nonsense in wildlife documentaries, where all creatures great and small act for the great good and the harmony of the ecosystem. As Darwin said, “What a book a devil’s chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering, low and horribly cruel works of nature!” A classic example is the ichneumon wasp, who paralyzes a caterpillar and lays eggs in its body so her hatchlings can slowly devour its living flesh from the inside.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Large Ant Essay

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What is “human nature”? Do a natural set of behavioral paradigms govern our morals at the most basic level? And more importantly, are those prescribed behaviors inherently good, or naturally evil? The Large Ant by Howard Fast depicts human nature as leaning toward the latter. Many other artistic and literary works seem to take this position, arguing that because humans have the capacity to commit evil deeds, they must themselves be evil. In Fast’s view, humans are naturally selfish and xenophobic, reacting to the unknown with violence instead of simple curiosity. This story, however, presents an overly cynical and unrealistic glimpse of human nature at its worst. Its arguments are often self-contradictory, and in the end, The Large Ant’s critique of human nature proves unjustifiably negative.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nature vs. Nurture – A debate within psychology that explores the extent to which specific aspects of behavior are inherited or learnt as a result of environmental influences.…

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the "nature vs nurture" debate, nature refers to an individual's innate qualities (nativism). Nature is your genes. The physical and personality traits determined by your genes stay the same irrespective of where you were born and raised. Nature factors that trigger an individual to commit crime are influences by biological and family factors. The nature method suggests that individuals are born with qualities, abilities and characteristics that determine the kind of person that individual will become.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Human nature is a vexing issue: some argue that we are born as blank slates and our 
natures are defined by upbringing, experience, culture and the ideas of our time. Others 
believe that human nature is innate and pre-destined, regardless of time and…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I have always held the belief that Nature v Nurture is not a zero-sum game. To steal a line from T.S. Elliot’s The Hollow Men, I believe humans are born into this world a “shape without form.” That shape, of course, is our nature; the sum of our genetic make-up and natural tendencies based on some combination of predisposition and innate sense of self. The form, then, necessarily reflects our experiences and the way those have restructured our ‘self.’ The nurture of our mind, particularly at a young age, is instrumental in providing depth and context to our natural shape. Both aspects of our ‘self’ are complimentary. Just like we are unable to understand shape without the context of form, we are similarly unable to understand humans without an understanding in the dynamic of both nature and nurture expressed through our behavior, desires, and interactions.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Disaster in Franklin Co.

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One generalized controversial example of the nature vs. nurture debate, and how each side believes, is explained by Starr Kang, “according to someone who believes nature determines behavior, although a child may have had wonderful life experiences and a stellar upbringing, if he is genetically predisposed to violent behavior, no amount of good parenting can alter that.”(Kang, n.d.)…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, in the case of nature vs. nurture, nurture is what makes humans do evil things. From boys living alone, trying to survive on an island, to grown men thrown into a psychological experiment, their environment is what causes their sadistic/evil behavior. Although it is true that people make the wrong decisions in life, it does not mean that they were born with a desire to do…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Are serial killers naturally, instinctive psychopaths or are they the result of a corrupt upbringing? Are you more at risk of becoming a smoker because of your genes or is it a result of the peers you socialize with? Now, these types of questions have instigated disputes among psychologists in determining who we are, whether it is a result of nature, such as heredity, or is it the outcome of the nurturing of one’s environment that shape our personality? In other words, were you born with a blank mind and over time you developed your characteristics or were you born with talents and characteristics since birth? Regarded as the oldest issue known in the field of psychology, nature versus nurture is and this debate centers on the question: How…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With nature versus nurture being a widely discussed debate it is easy to tie into different situations. "The debate within psychology is concerned with the extent to which aspects of behavior are a product of either inherited (i.e. genetic) or acquired (i.e. learned) characteristics” (McLeod).There is two sides to the debate nature…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Darwinism is an ideology found commonly within the late nineteenth century. It was inspired from Darwinism and is the result of natural selection. Social Darwinism is a theory rooted in the ability to apply the laws of nature to a society and its people and is often associated with the popular notion of “survival of the fittest.” However, it is often used to justify social and political policies that discriminate against a certain type of people. What role did Social Darwinism play in the unfolding of the Holocaust? Social Darwinism played a role in the Holocaust through the Theory of Natural Selection and the lead versus follow principle; both allowed Hitler to believe the Aryans as the “Master” race and the need to exterminate all other peoples, in particular the Jews. It is important to examine and distinguish the differences between Darwinism and Social Darwinism when applying the Theory of Natural Selection to Hitler and the Nazi ideology. Secondly, the concept of human behaviour plays a key role in the unfolding of the holocaust through the Lead versus Follow principle.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nature Vs Nurture Theory

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Physical features, although unique in some measure, are proven to be acquired from the biological parents of any organism. The Nature v. Nurture debate relates to humans and how they develop their unique behavioral habits. Many who support the Nature Theory endorse essentially that a person’s intelligence, personality, aggression, and sexual orientation pertain primarily to their DNA stemmed from their biological parents (Powell). For example, if someone’s parents are depressed or violent, the Nature Theory supporters conclude that their offspring will also bear these negative these traits. However, the Nurture Theory presents that these behavioral aspects are originated predominantly from the environmental factors of our upbringing, which…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health and Social Care

    • 2560 Words
    • 11 Pages

    It has been reported that the use of the terms "nature" and "nurture" as a convenient catch-phrase for the roles of heredity and environment in human development can be traced back to 13th century France. Some scientists think that people behave as they do according to genetic predispositions or even "animal instincts." This is known as the "nature" theory of human behaviour. Other scientists believe that people think and behave in certain ways because they are taught to do so. This is known as the "nurture" theory of human behaviour.…

    • 2560 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I. Lewis analyses the Law of Human Nature and answers some of his reader’s objections. (3-15)…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Darwinism

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The vast majority of “Darwinian” political explanations, values systems, and theories seem to have been built on false premises. As Levine has also showed, Darwinism could be twisted…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nature Nurture Controversy

    • 3735 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Austin D. Miller social influences, such as wealth and education, contribute to them. With the modern age, a new dimension of human development has emerged, specifically, the noetic. The term comes from the Greek word for mind, and refers to a person’s individual agency and freedom, but more specifically the ability to think. In this essay, agency refers to the capacity of an individual to choose and carry out any course in the presence of several options. Each of the traditional perspectives (nature and nurture) offers a unique view on the factors that shape the development of personality. However, these perspectives, taken individually, do not adequately explain how or why people develop differences in behavior and personality. At best, when these two perspectives are combined, they provide a better but still incomplete and inaccurate depiction of human behavior. Furthermore, nature, nurture, and the noetic not only represent a scientific schism but also reveal underlying disparities in life styles and philosophies: people typically support theories that reflect their cosmological perspectives of life. Nature and nurture imply moral hedonism (i.e., anything that is pleasing is morally right and anything that is displeasing is morally wrong) by asserting that we cannot control what our genes/society dictate us to do, whereas the noetic preserves moral responsibility by declaring that despite the influences in our lives, we ultimately have the ability to choose. To better understand some of the important implications of the centuries-old debate and the relevance of the noetic for the debate, it is important to understand its origins and how the debate has evolved subsequently. Officially, the nature–nurture debate can trace its origin to 1874 even though it has been discussed or at least hinted at by philosophers in all ages. In 1874, however, the intellectual world…

    • 3735 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays