Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Nationalism After the War of 1812 and Important Court Cases of the Time.

Good Essays
571 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nationalism After the War of 1812 and Important Court Cases of the Time.
After the war of 1812, a surge of nationalism spread everywhere throughout America. Having unofficially won the war without even an official army, the people of America became very proud of themselves and how their great country established such a feat. The nationalism grew until John Marshall, an aggressive Chief Justice, further strengthened and expanded it. He was a devout Federalist appointed by John Adams years before his most famous case of Marbury vs. Madison in 1803. Being a Federalist he was a great rival to Thomas Jefferson. He served until 1835 and was the forth Supreme Court Justice.

His only legal schooling was six weeks attending lectures at the College of William and Mary, however when he took the bench in 1801, he changed the Judicial Branch as we know it. In fact, he made the branch the most powerful section of the government at that time.

His most significant early case was the famous Marbury v. Madison in 1803, which established the right of the court to declare the actions of local, state or federal governments invalid if they violate the Constitution. This process of declaring actions void was called Judicial Review and it made the Court equally as powerful as the legislative and executive branches of government.

Another important case was Martin vs. Hunter's Lessee in 1816. The ruling by Marshall declared that the power of the Supreme Court extended to the State Courts. The court now had the right to directly review other courts decisions. Yet another case, Cohens vs. Virginia strengthened this right and extended the reach of the court all the way to the citizens of the U.S. and states. Marshall's court became more and more powerful until it got the right to review almost all lower court decisions.

The famous Fletcher vs. Peck case ruled (in 1810) that the Supreme Court had the right to void State laws. The details behind the case were as follows: The Georgia legislature had issued extensive land grants in a deal with the Yazoo Land Company. It seemed suspicious so the company was taken to court. A subsequent legislative session repealed the grants because of the corruption that had accompanied the original grant. The Supreme Court, with Marshall presiding, decided that the original action by the Georgia Assembly had constituted a valid contract, which could not be broken regardless of the corruption. This was the very first time that a State law was voided because it went against the Constitution.

Then, after the war of 1812 Marshall issued more decisions that strengthened the federal government and Federalist ideas. In the McCulloch vs. Maryland case, Marshall ruled that the state did not have the right to tax or regulate banks. This also encouraged economic expansion and development. In the Dartmouth vs. Woodward case it was declared that the states had no right to alter or impair contracts unilaterally. It also promoted business development.

The last important case was Gibbons vs. Ogden, which further strengthened federal power by ruling that the Constitution had specifically given Congress the power to regulate commerce.

Under John Marshall, the Supreme Court gained enough power to surpass the power of the other branches of the government. He also declared many laws and rulings that America still follows and lives under even today. Either way, he changed the Judicial branch forever, especially at that time and the world has never seen a more intelligent man presiding.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Some decisions that were made were in the Marbury Vs. Madison case, McCulloch Vs. Maryland case, Scott Vs. Sandford case, etc. These cases each greatly impacted our great nation and what it is today.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall strengthened the power of the federal government by expanding the power of the federal judiciary. Becoming Supreme Court Justice in 1801, John Marshall defined the judicial branch as a power in the US government for the first time. Before this point in time the judicial branch was weak and served little purpose. The Supreme Court had little power to check and balance the legislative and executive branches as intended. Marshall’s rulings on controversial cases like Marbury v. Madison (1803), Fletcher v. Peck (1809), and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) laid the foundation for what we know today as a powerful judicial branch.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury v. Madison

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a the year of 1803 a watershed case, Marbury v. Madison, John Marshal Chief Justice's opinion founded the Supreme Court's power to declare acts of United States Congress, and by significance acts of the president, unconstitutional if they surpassed the authorities allowed by the Establishment or Constitution. But most significant thing was that the Court became the judge of the Constitution, the final authority on what the document meant. Intrinsically, the Supreme Court became as a matter of fact also as in theory an equal partner in authorities, and it has acted that role always later on (Erskine P.88-109).…

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. John Marshall: Chief Justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 until his death in 1835. Under Marshall’s leadership, the Court became as powerful a federal force as the executive and legislative branches. Marshall’s most notable decision came in the 1803 Marbury v. Madison case, in which he asserted the principle of judicial review.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case of Marbury v. Madison (1803) has been described as "epochal", and for good reason. The case of Marbury v. Madison established the Supreme Court's power of judicial review. Judicial review is the ability of the Supreme Court to "review a law or an official act of government employee or agent for constitutionality or for the violation of basic principles of justice." This case directly shaped the future of the American public in a positive way: by making decisions that are lawfully correct and in the best interest of the public. This also had some short-term and long-term ramifications, including the decision that declared the legality of the Louisiana Purchase, the single act that doubled the size of the United States and laid the foundation for a future superpower.…

    • 762 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v Madison enacted the principle of Judicial Review, which is the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution (“Marbury v Madison”). Brown v School Board of Education overturned the provisions of Plessy v Ferguson by ruling segregation as unconstitutional. Tinker v Des Moines established students right to public speech (“Landmark Cases”). Supreme Court interpretation, allows the original text of the Constitution to be mended in order to accommodate to the time…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marshall’s ruling for Marbury v Madison was one of the most controversial decisions to ever be handed down from the Supreme Court. The landmark decision ultimately made the Judicial branch the most powerful branch because of the judicial review. With judicial review the Supreme Court has the ability to interpret the Constitution or any law any way that the court sees fit accordance to the law. Marshall’s ruling was clear and concise. Marbury did have the right to his appoint under law. Marbury had the right to seek a remedy because he deemed himself injured but the Supreme Court could not issue the writ because it was not of original jurisdiction. If Marbury was to have went through a lower level court, the court would have issued the writ and taken his appointment as the chief justice of…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the time period in which Supreme Court was under the rule of John Marshall the power of judicial branch was greatly strengthened. The decision of the Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819, states could not tax federal institutions and upheld by congressional authority to create the Second Bank of the United States, even though the authority to do this was not expressly stated in the Constitution. This decision made stronger the federal supremacy and national economic interests. Also the debate between Federalist and Anti-Federalists over approval demonstrated the existence of differences of opinion on government. The formation of political parties led to constitutional changes in the method of electing the president, which is today voting.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nfib vs. Sebelius

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison, he says, “if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty” (317). Judicial review for Marshall was to balance the powers of the branches of government and to establish…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another factor which effected the nation’s unity was the court. Since John Adams appointed “midnight judges” to the Supreme Court during the final…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury V. Madison

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the government was newly establishing its stronghold on the nation a struggle to preserve the foundations of American society instituted by Washington and John Adams existed as Thomas Jefferson took office. In an attempt to maintain the "edifice of the National Government" believing Jefferson would topple the prestigious nation with his atheist views, Adams appointed various Federalists to the judiciary. Thus, attributing to the single most significant case of the Supreme Court, Marbury v. Madison, a struggle between Republicans and Federalists that would end in a future altered by fate. This controversial landmark case established the constitution as "Supreme law" of the United States and developed the power of the Supreme Court, enhancing its independence and proving it a nonpartisan instrument. It established the precedent for the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of laws, through the principle of judicial review. The development of this power to interpret the constitution instituted the flexibility of the constitution and the ability to forge a road of precedent unfamiliar to the new government, as well as firmly grounding the role of the Judicial Branch.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "John Marshall was the fourth chief justice of the United States, he was known as Great Chief Justice. He established the modern status of the Supreme Court. He served in the Revolutionary War, studied law, and was elected to the Virginia legislature in 1782. A staunch Federalist, Marshall supported acceptance of the Constitution. He declined ministerial posts but became one of the United States negotiators who resolved the XYZ Affair. Elected to Congress in 1799, he was made secretary of state by President John Adams. In 1801 he became Chief Justice. Marshall labored to increase the then-scant power and prestige of the Supreme Courts" (Harkavy, 680).…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall was the fourth chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1800-1835. Marshall’s court opinions helped lay the basis for the United States constitutional law and made the Supreme Court of the United States an equal branch of government, along with legislative and executive branches.…

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Decisions

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There were many factors that led to Marbury v. Madison evolving into the case that it did. One might consider Thomas Jefferson’s election in 1800 to be the starter. Jefferson was an advocate of a weak national government, as opposed to the federalists who had been in control before 1800. So while John Adams was on his way out of the presidency, he and the federalists appointed more judges to newly created federal courts. So Jefferson went after these federal courts, ordering James Madison to not deliver the paper that would officially give Marbury his position as judge for one of these courts. So Marbury took this to court. Chief Justice John Marshall gave a remarkable ruling because he assumed a new power for the judiciary. He was able to avoid deciding on the issue directly. He said that while Marbury should have been given his appointment papers, the law granting the power to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver the papers was itself unconstitutional. This started the thought of judicial review. This was the part of the decision that proved the most influential on American history. Marshal greatly strengthened the Supreme Court giving the judicial branch its foundations as an equal part in the system of checks and balances. Although the Supreme Court rarely declares a law unconstitutional, judicial review remains its greatest weapon to counteract the executive and legislative branches.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both parents were politically connected. He was in the army until 1781. Then spent 34 years as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Until he died on July 6,1835. John Marshall is famous for a couple of things.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays