Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

National Security vs. Personal Privacy

Good Essays
851 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
National Security vs. Personal Privacy
Law Assignment - National Security versus Personal Privacy

What is your opinion on this issue? Justify your view in a short written report

In response to the September 11 attacks, section 107 of the Customs Act was put in place. In essence, Section 107 states that customs officers can now access airline passenger lists consisting of personal information, this information will also be placed in a database for the next 6 years.

As stated in Customs Act, Section 107

Amended section 107 of the Customs Act became effective on November 29, 2001. It replaced former sections 107 and 108. Section 107 provides strict prohibitions on the provision to others, allowing access to others, and the use of customs information.

My opinion on this issue is very definite as I am in unison with Elinor Caplan as he describes in the article “it fixed the gap.” Simply by stating this he meant that there was an obvious problem that the government had no knowledge of who was flying into Canada by commercial jetliner. I personally agree with The Minister of National Revenue and believe that Section 107 further protects Canadian citizens and is in the best interest for society. The change to the Customs Act helps the government foresee potential threats and problems that would be at hazard to Canada while also balancing privacy rights to Canadian citizens. It is a major investigative tool which has helped rescue children and thwarted armed criminals from entering. The fact that Canadian government obtains such information for 6 years is reasonable to the very least. As in the interest for the citizens, the government is only concerned with the information that shows any plausible threat. As stated, advance passenger information significantly increases our ability to track pedophiles, find criminals trying to enter our country, identify potential drug smugglers, and protect the health of Canadians. By obtaining passenger information in advance, it will provide customs officers with time to assess set individual and process large volumes of people more efficiently. Just having access to data helps Canadian government focus their attention and efforts to passengers who pose at high risk.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is intended to foster values and recognized as an important part of Canadian society, which may also used to the contrary on this issue. Although these rights are set out to protect the dignity and liberty of a Canadian citizen in free society they must also be balanced in proportion to limit violation of basic rights in the slightest way possible. As George Radwanski states in the article “All this information will be stored not to provide you with any service but to have it handy if it ever becomes expedient to do so.” I do oppose to this statement. I oppose it mainly because it is a service for Canadians to provide higher security to them. Canadian government holds this information to protect the better of Canadian citizens but uses this information to also be used against you if found reason to. In the article Mr. Radwanski referred Section 107 to “Big Brother” which in my opinion is a complete exaggeration as this section only has to do with Canadian customs and not entirely with society. If he has any knowledge of Section 107 he would know it is disciplined with Canadian Customs and who is entering Canada. The aspect of “Big Brother” may be viewed adversely due to the fact that it describes an all powerful government body that keeps the population under strict control. The view of this term should be used positively as it monitors national security and the well being of Canadian citizens. There is only a certain degree in which information would be used against citizens if found threatening in anyway. I do not believe that the Canadian government has time to distress over the slightest amount of information that would not affect Canadian society as a whole.

e.g : If Canadian Customs has reason to believe you are smuggling drugs into Canada because you were charged with drug possession 4 years ago.

This is complete reason for Canadian Customs not to allow you into the country because of the simple fact that it is violation of law, it threatens society and is wrong, there is potential that such event may happen again.

e.g : You are a homosexual and going on vacation with your boyfriend, though you work in a catholic school.

This should be ignored as it does not threaten Canadian Society as a whole, but the views of the catholic faith. As the government does not need to consider such small complications.

The main objective of this act is to protect Canadians and to prevent potential September 11 events from ever occurring again, it reminded us that we are not immune to terrorism. Section 107 was immediately put in place so that these events do not happen. Countering terrorism and protecting Canada is a shared responsibility that should involve everybody. With this section put in place, Canadians can feel more secure, as we are working collaboratively for the greater good.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mgt 200

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The announcement comes days after security screeners at the airport were criticized in an internal TSA document that alleged startling, large-scale security failures. The document was reported by New Jersey's Star Ledger.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In chapter three of the grade nine social studies textbook, there is an article named “No fly list.” This article explains how this bill violates the mobility rights. Citizens of Canada have the right to enter, leave and stay Canada at will. This bill gives CSIS the right to hold a citizen in Canada, if they suspect this…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The recent September 11th attacks have caused many Americans to wonder about the personal sacrifices to be made in order to keep the nation "safe and free." With mixed results, it has become a common practice throughout history to restrict personal freedoms in the name of national security. Many questions arise from this process: Where is the line drawn? If liberties are restricted do they ever truly return? If it is true that we are doomed to repeat history if we fail to learn from it, an examination into the circumstances of the Japanese American internment in 1942 may inform the ways to most effectively deal with the security concerns faced by Americans today.…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros/Cons Patriot Act

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The House of Representatives passed the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 on October 24, 2001. This is also known as the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was designed to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world and to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools (USA Patriot Act, 2001). The events of September 11, 2001 led to the near unanimous support for the Patriot Act. In this paper, our learning team will discuss the many pros and cons of the Patriot Act of 2001.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Argumentative Essay

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    9/11 was a wake up call that the security needed to change. Ever since airports were created, both the airports and flight security have been an area of struggle and concern for the United States government. The government went to the Federal Aviation Administration and passed many bills to insure the safeness of airports and planes following the event of 9/11.The cooperation had regulation about bringing specific things onto your carry on and in your checked bag. People felt as though some of the regulation were unnecessary and overbearing. Before 9/11 an airport would not have as strict security, but would have some security. With the new security came new technology as well, the technology was good and bad. For example, some changes are that officers in the past did have to go thought the same precautions as they do now. Now people in the airport have to take their shoes, jewelry and anything that could be able to harm another person, or something you could store something illegal or outlawed in. But some people have a differnt opinions and feel that these new procaustion arent that bad, or even better. “I actually prefer to get body scanned versus a pat down. I find the body scan to be a little less personal”-Bruce Kornfeld The changes that all the airports made impacts the government's financial stand greatly. The amount of money the government…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Patriot Act

    • 14268 Words
    • 58 Pages

    This Thesis will provide an overview of the controversial sections of the USA Patriot Act as it relates to the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and Eighth Amendments of the Constitution. In addition this Thesis will summarize the Controversial sections of the Military Authorization Act which goes into effect May, 3 2012. Both Acts appear to violate many of the basic principles that have been articulated in the U.S. Constitution, particularly within the Bill of Rights.…

    • 14268 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ethics are “moral principles that govern behavior” (Oxford). The cornerstone of American democracy is offering inherent rights and freedom, but the term privacy must be evaluated. Recently, America has become a country that has drawn much unwanted attention to its government to due reports of the National Security Agency storing information gathered from people’s phones without letting the public know. Before going any further into research, it should be noted that as an American, there is certainly an inherited bias throughout the paper. This problem with the NSA has unearthed many feelings from the public and also politicians who either support or go against the storage of phone records. Since Edward Snowden released hard facts that the NSA was indeed storing phone records, people seem to either have a big problem with the bulk collection, or no problem at all (5). The NSA claims that colleting phone records is necessary in order to protect the world from possible terrorist threats, but civil libertarians say that because the government is not legally required to destroy the information once it has been collected, it is therefore an invasion of privacy (5). It is clear that in order to keep everyone safe, America not only has the right, but also the full responsibility of gathering intelligence in any way possible…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why do you believe this issue is so significant? (Include sources to back up your statements)…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It will be difficult to avoid logical fallicies on this topic. Because I am coming down on one side of this discussion and want to persuade my audience, I will want to use comments and information from those that view it as I do. Using statistics that are deemed factual will help in showing that these are not just biased opinions from politicians that are simply looking for another vote.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America's Privacy

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a U.S. law called the Patriot Act was passed under the Bush administration. The goal of passing this law was to strengthen domestic security and broaden the powers of law-enforcement agencies with regards to identifying and stopping terrorists (Grabianowski). The privacy of the American public was first questioned in 2006 when USA Today reported that the NSA had “been secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth” and was “using the data to analyze calling patterns in an effort to detect terrorist activity” (Greenwald). This article referred to a secret…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberty vs Security

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When the founding fathers created the government of the United States, they wanted the government not to be so constricting with its rule. In other words, freedom, but freedom in its purest can be dangerous so they had to put some security to their newly made country. They did this by giving the executive branch the power to enforce laws and keep the peace. In the beginning, it was all good but things have changed throughout the years where security had to be increased. Now-a-days, some people think security has been increase to such a point that there isn’t fair anymore but that just isn’t the case. There is now terrorism in the world people live in and the Executive branch is taking the necessary precautions to stay safe. With the Obama Administration’s war on terror, the executive branch is taking the necessary precautions to keep the nation safe with drone attacks, warrantless wiretapping, and advanced interrogation techniques.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guantanamo Bay

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Safety and security in air transport around the world became stricter following the 9/11 attacks. There were more regulations around what people could bring in and on planes, and anyone suspected of terrorism or involvement with the al-Qaeda organisation (one of the world’s largest terrorist organisations) or the Taliban could be detained in Guantanamo Bay without being fairly charged or trialled.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: www.archives.gov The United States Constitution www.epic.org “USA Patriot Act Page” 10/24/2001 www.nolan chart.com The Patriot Act www.ushistory.org “The Electric Ben Franklin” copyright 1999 www.youtube.com Documentary Unconstitutional: The War on Civil Liberties 6/12/2007 David Cole and Jules Lobel- Are We Safe? Los Angeles Times: Opinion 11/18/2007…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apple should let the F.B.I unlock the phone used by Syed Rizwan Farook. It is very clear that protection outweighs our privacy. By unlocking this phone, vital information can be exposed, therefore preventing another destructive acts. Anyone who is considered an enemy deserves no right to privacy. What Apple is doing is almost as leaving a criminals biography unread, while trying to solve a terrorism case. According to the article, "The data on the phone could yield valuable intelligence, making its content a legitimate matter of national security." When you get right down to it, privacy is something we, as a society should ne willing to give up in order to gain better protection of our country. Dead or alive, the data on the criminals phone…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Living a secured life is fundamental for each of the individuals. National Security was not a threat and will never be a threat to our freedoms. The criminals act against benevolence. If a nation is secured, it would be a total disaster for the grudgeful evils which would be profitable for the innocent souls, who just get to feel hurt or die with no reason....The nurturing buds, the mature flowers and the old trees; every being, from infancy to oldhood, needs defender to shield them. And, the National Security, with no doubt, acts as a refuge or a safeguard for the countrymen.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays