Preview

National Security Agency Pros And Cons

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
263 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
National Security Agency Pros And Cons
A US government requests court has rejected endeavors by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to stop mass accumulation of a large number of Americans' telephone records.

The second US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said on Thursday that Congress needed the National Security Agency (NSA) project to keep amid a six-month move period in the witness of another law produces results.

"An unexpected end to the project would be in opposition to the general population enthusiasm for viable observation of terrorist dangers, and Congress accordingly gave a 180-day move period," Circuit Judge Gerard Lynch composed for a three-judge board. "Considering the present situation, we will concede to that sensible choice."

In May, the requests court nullified the mass spying system as illicit and disregarding Americans' protection rights.
…show more content…
The ACLU tried to stop the reconnaissance before the dispatch of the new plan.

In any case, the second US Circuit Court contended that a sudden end to the present project would hurt people in general enthusiasm for viable observation of terrorist dangers.

The US mass spying system was initially unveiled in 2013 by NSA temporary worker Edward Snowden the office which brought it under cruel feedback both in the US and around the globe.

Snowden, who lives in Russia where he has been allowed refuge, has said that US government reconnaissance strategies far surpass those of an "Orwellian" state, alluding to George Orwell's exemplary novel "1984," which portrays a general public where individual protection is ceaselessly attacked by spy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This did nothing to stop the NSA, they continued to work in secret listening in without any restrictions or laws with the idea that it was to better the people. The Electronic Frontier foundation states that in 2005 the NSA was collecting data from major communications companies which violate the privacy safeguards put in by the U.S. congress and constitution. The EFF has been able to collect information through whistle blowers and in 2013 the media articles proving the reports of 2005 showing the government got everything that passed through all domestic fiber optic cables, the excuse once caught was under the Patriot act the government can collect any information they deem necessary for national security. Is it national security or national…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 7, 2015 the Federal Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the National Security Agency's collection of American phone records in bulk is illegal. Specifically, they ruled that the practice did not fall under the scope of the USA Patriot Act, which allows wire tapping of individuals to detect and prevent terrorism. What is the USA Patriot Act? The USA Patriot Act is a 10-letter acronym for uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism act of 2001. It was passed by Congress following the terrorist attacks of September 11 and signed into law by George W. Bush in 2001. Later when it was set to expire in 2011 Barack Obama renewed the law for another 4 years. The Patriot Act…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government has failed to identify any particular “authorized investigation”. While I believe the fight against terrorism is an important fight to fight, simply using that as a reason to collect this data is too broad. Additionally, I support Judge Lynch’s finding that Congress meant to exclude this broad collection of data, and that if he agreed with the government it would cause a reading out of the term “authorized investigation”.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Far on the other side of the fence, Sears and Osten suggest that the America Civil Liberties Union has actually weakened America. “One of the great myths of the twentieth century…is that the American Civil Liberties Union started out as a good, pro-American….When we look closely at the ACLU’s roots, the evidence shows something else. From the very start, the American Civil Liberties Union wanted to destroy from within the America our founders intended, with the use of lawyers and the courts as the chief weapons.” (7)…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal wiretaps to monitor groups or individuals that it suspects of domestic terrorism seemed foreign before September 11th, and now has become a way to gain more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although the unconstitutional, albeit controversially legal and nearly-Orwellian programs were not a complete surprise, the extent and scope was staggering. The exposure was a big blow to the Americans and had them scrambling to understand the implications, contain…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages

    On October 26th, 2001, just 45 days after September 11th a panicked Congress passed, with little debate, the USA Patriot Act. The 342 page patriot act violates our 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th amendments, thus making it unconstitutional. I don't know why Congress passed this act, or how it got through the Supreme Court, but most people in Congress didn't even read the Patriot Act. I am sure that our founding fathers would not have wanted the Patriot Act. Just look at what Ben Franklin said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."…

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The National Defense Authorization Act greatly expands the power and scope of the federal government to fight the War on Terror, including codifying into law the indefinite detention of terrorism suspects without trial. Under the new law the US military has the power to carry out domestic anti-terrorism operations on US soil.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patriot act essay 4

    • 1692 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just 6 weeks after the attacks on 9/11, the Bush Administration put forth an act to help protect and ensure the United States from any further international terrorist attacks that may penetrate U.S. soil. Known as the PATRIOT ACT or “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism,” Act, It had been proposed and created with the wise intentions to find and intercept terrorists operating on American soil as well as protecting it on an international scale; yet, many Americans and citizens see fault within our government and the limitations of the patriot act of obstructions to our very own constitution set forth by our founding fathers.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Patriot was enacted so quickly, and with little oversight, a full review with the complete participation of Congress could allow for positive revisions. Without losing the major benefits, such as increased security and safety for our nations citizens, collective law enforcement cooperation and information sharing, and speeding up investigations by making legitimate use of surveillance easier to enact, taking another look at this incredibly powerful law is imperative. Allowing government authority to surpass that which the Constitution allows is completely contradictory to the founders intentions, and to the principles on which this nation was founded. As stated by Benjamin Franklin in his Pennsylvania Assembly Reply to the Governor, “those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” (Franklin, 1755). This is important to remember, as our nation becomes more accepting of tighter scrutiny in our private lives, all in the name of safety and security. Our world is changing, to be certain, though the extent in which we allow that change is solely in our hands, we, the people of the United…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    USA Patriot Act

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In response to September 11, congress passed the USA Patriot Act which, by creating new laws, increased the goverments' power of surveillance, in the hope to aid in the prevention of future terrorist attacks. The ACLU believes that the USA Patriot Act challenges the law when it come to the protection of privacy for Americans, however, the USA Patriot Act instead, ensures the safety of the American people; and although it was one of the quickest pieces of legislation to be passed, it was an effort to counter terrorism.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Snowden exposed classified operations that have caused heads of state and both the American public and political realms alike to demand reform. Prime Minister Benjamen Netanyahu seemed to let it slide, although now the fact was out in the open that the US were even spying on allies, Israel of course being dubbed I the past as “Americas aircraft carrier in the middle east”. Snowden’s leaks also caused political debate in China, where claims were made that the bulk of the USA’s 61,000 hacking operations took…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress: No person thinks more of the security of our nation and the safety of its people than I do. The men and women of this powerful nation have protected it with their lives, and many have sacrificed their precious lives in order for us to have freedom. National security is important to the continuation of our freedom. But different people see the same subject in different light; therefore, I hope it won’t be thought disrespectful to propose an opinion that limits some of the hard-fought freedom. The character of the opinions are without reserve, and I will speak my sentiments freely. This is no time delay. The question before Congress is one at an awful moment in this country’s national security. I consider it nothing less than a question…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriot Act

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A month in a half after 9/11 terrorist attack on the United States, the USA Patriot Act passed Congress, it 's also known as the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act, or more simply, the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was created with the noble intention of finding and prosecuting international terrorists operating on American soil; however, the unfortunate consequences of the Act have been drastic.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War in Terror

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Supreme courts are looking for important information about the terrors. However, the court has left…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays