Preview

National Laws on Terrorism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8763 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
National Laws on Terrorism
Q.1) What are the salient features of the Australian Anti-terrorism Legislation passed in 2004. Explain.
Answer:

Three anti-terrorism bills were enacted in the Australian Parliament in 2004 by a Coalition government with the Labor opposition's support. These were the Anti-terrorism bill, 2004, the Anti-terrorism bill (No 2), 2004 and the Anti-terrorism bill (No 3), 2004.

Anti-terrorism bill, 2004
The Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock, introduced the Anti-terrorism bill, 2004 on 31 March. He described it as "a bill to strengthen Australia's counter-terrorism laws in a number of respects – a task made more urgent following the recent tragic terrorist bombings in Spain." He said that Australia's counter-terrorism laws "require review and, where necessary, updating if we are to have a legal framework capable of safeguarding all Australians from the scourge of terrorism."
The provisions of this bill were: * To extend the fixed investigation period (that is, the period for which a suspect can be questioned before being either charged or released) under part 1C of the Crimes Act for investigations into suspected terrorism offences, from four hours to 24 hours. Any such extension would have to be authorised by a magistrate or other judicial officer. * To permit law enforcement agencies to reasonably suspend or delay questioning of a person suspected of committing a terrorism offence to make overseas inquiries to obtain information relevant to that terrorism investigation.
Ruddock said that the government recognised the need to "ensure that appropriate safeguards are put in place to maintain the balance between security and individual rights and freedom." Existing safeguards in part 1C of the Crimes Act continue to apply to terrorist suspects being investigated in accordance with the Crimes Act regime. These safeguards include: * A suspect's right to communicate with a legal practitioner, friend or relative, an interpreter or a consular office * A

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The FBI defines terrorism as “the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives” (As cited in Abadinsky, 2009, p.8). After Twenty-plus years of militant Islamic terrorist attacks, President Bush signed the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (U.S. A. Patriot Act), on October 26, 2001, in an effort to strengthen the nation’s counterterrorism resistance. In Organized Crime, Former Cook County, Illinois Sheriff’s Office…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Terrorism is an emerging and ongoing threat that says much about the fast-changing ­nature of global terrorism and the challenges Australia and the West face in trying to frame laws that can respond to the shifting threat without unduly infringing civil ­liberties. Dr Mohamed Haneef, an Indian national, was arrested at Brisbane airport on 2 July 2007 in connection with a failed London bomb plot. He was held for twelve days before being charged with providing support to a terrorist organisation. The charge was unsustainable and was quickly dropped. However, in the interim Dr Haneef's immigration visa was cancelled on character grounds - a decision which on review was found to be unlawful. The arrest, detention, charge and subsequent release of Dr Mohamed Haneef represented the first time that a number of legislative provisions, introduced to respond to the threat of terrorism, were relied on in practice. 1…

    • 1077 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    war and terrorism

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    P4: Discuss the methods used by UK Public Services to counter both National and International terrorism.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How should the defence power, Constitution s 51(vi), be interpreted in an age of terrorism?…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The most significant amendment to the bill was The Patriotic Act of 2001 after the country faced the biggest attack from a foreign terrorist group. The United States Department of Justice announced that it would seek legislation that would give powers to state authorities to protect the homeland from such activities and attacks in the future. The proposed legislation was to give federal authorities the ability to monitor internet use, intercept emails and phone calls as well as wiretapping conversion between citizens and non citizens. The Act would also permit the detention of non citizens who are deemed to be dangerous to the home land (Center for American Progress 2005). This Act is by far one of the most controversial legislation in the history of the Congress. This paper looks to analyze the provisions of the Act as well as the pro and cons that came along.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Geography Defense Force

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Australia has its own defence force that defends itself and assists many other nations. Defence is the action of defending from, or resisting attack. Although the main aim and purpose of this defence force is to protect people and fight in the “War on Terror”, it can have cultural, economic and geopolitical advantages and disadvantages.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This laundry list of legislation was in place before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Until then, debate…

    • 3371 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros/Cons Patriot Act

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The House of Representatives passed the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 on October 24, 2001. This is also known as the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was designed to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world and to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools (USA Patriot Act, 2001). The events of September 11, 2001 led to the near unanimous support for the Patriot Act. In this paper, our learning team will discuss the many pros and cons of the Patriot Act of 2001.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To get a better understanding of the creation of this “super agency” details need to be giving about the agencies that will take part. The details will show history, how the agency works and how the agency affects counter-terrorism and intelligence gathering. The first agency that will be discussed is the FBI. The FBI originated in 1908 when Attorney General Charles J. Bonapart selected special agents to be the sole investigative force of the Department of Justice (Department of Justice). The FBI responsibilities include criminal law enforcement, domestic counterterrorism, and domestic…

    • 2750 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill C-51 Thesis

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page

    Canada is a country is known for its tolerance and its emphasis on individual freedom. Embedded within its constitution is the Charter of Rights and Freedom, which is outlines and enforces the rights many of Canadians. However the increasing frequency in terror attacks such as 911, and more recently the parliament shooting in Ottawa, has given way to the enactment of bill C-51 also known as the Anti-Terrorism Act (Sokolyk, 2015 p. 41). What is Bill C-51, and what are the implications it has in Canadian society? The purpose of this paper is to analyze Bill C-51 and describe the implications it has on Canadian society in terms of establishing criminal offences that infringe upon basic civil liberties. Some may feel that Bill C-51is necessary…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    US Immigration

    • 2291 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) followed soon after the World Trade Centre and Oklahoma City bombings. This act aims to deter extremist attacks and to provide…

    • 2291 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In response to September 11, the United States reshaped its anti-terrorist strategies to prevent future attacks by targeting terrorists, foreign and domestic, known and potential. October 26, 2001 the USA Patriot Act was signed into law, it facilitates the prosecution of terrorists, by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terrorism. This act was created in response to the attacks on September 11, 2001. “The…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jatta Pros And Cons

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main purpose of the act is to narrow and limit the immunity of foreign states in cases where international terrorism acts might arise.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 7 ]. GovTrack., S. 2845 (108th): Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004., Website., Washington D.C. accessed October 3, 2012…

    • 3049 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics