Natalie Attired Legal Memorandum: Case Study
To: Senior Partner
From: Paralegal
Re: Natalie Attired Legal Memorandum #12345
Date: April 10, 2012
Issues
1. Was Natalie’s Tattoo really going to cause the “more mature” clientele to be “appalled and disgusted” and wanting to be waited on by another waitress?
2. Does Ms. Baker have anything in writing at the time of her firing Ms. Attired?
3. Was Natalie Attired’s unemployment benefits rightfully terminated?
Brief answers
1. According to Ms. Baker, Natalie’s tattoo would lead to a decline in sales. Although Ms. Baker was not able to provide the documents to support this. Ms. Bakers did provide the names of two longtime customers who indeed did request different tables.
2. All that Ms. Attired was aware of was the four different
From: Paralegal
Re: Natalie Attired Legal Memorandum #12345
Date: April 10, 2012
Issues
1. Was Natalie’s Tattoo really going to cause the “more mature” clientele to be “appalled and disgusted” and wanting to be waited on by another waitress?
2. Does Ms. Baker have anything in writing at the time of her firing Ms. Attired?
3. Was Natalie Attired’s unemployment benefits rightfully terminated?
Brief answers
1. According to Ms. Baker, Natalie’s tattoo would lead to a decline in sales. Although Ms. Baker was not able to provide the documents to support this. Ms. Bakers did provide the names of two longtime customers who indeed did request different tables.
2. All that Ms. Attired was aware of was the four different