Preview

Napster Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1768 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Napster Case Study
Napster & MP3: Redefining The Music Industry

Introduction

Napster was the first, very innovative music technology application that allowed users to download MP3 from the internet and other peers for free, or at a cost. Napster strongly adapted the word sharing and put it their own terms to avoid any copyright infringement but it ended badly on their part. This disruptive technology was leading the market and had over 60 million users by 2001. Although very similar technologies were soon after developed, Napster was still on top and lead the market. Many users knew exactly what they wanted but getting it seemed to be the difficult part once Napster and the RIAA went into a legal battle. More commonly, the industry has been shaped from Napster and the base product that has been derived. Napster may have been a failure to the industry but it shaped the industry for the future from 2001 until present and for years to come.

1. What is Napster’s business model?

Being as though Napster was the first to market with their music search engine for MP3 files, they successfully managed to set up an online community where users could download these files. Napster had its market segments and was targeting the college and high school demographic, as described in the case study. The main objective was to give users the opportunity to listen to the songs before they wanted to go ahead and purchase them. During the dot.com boom, when Napster was created, it seemed as though the developers only wanted to create the program to attract a client base to increase the value of the company mainly to sell it off to a larger, more valuable company. Once the main database of Napster was created, they started off by seemingly trying to create a membership based business model. They had a free membership to start as a trial run, basic membership for relatively inexpensive that would cost between $2.95 and $4.95 per month. This basic membership would have a limit on file

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    BIS 375 Final Exam

    • 612 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since Napster encouraged peer-to-peer file sharing and did not actually publish music at its site, the courts ruled that Napster's operations were exempt from traditional copyright laws.…

    • 612 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    NT 1210

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page

    Napster is a name given to two music-focused online services. It was originally founded as a pioneering Internet service that emphasized sharing audio files, typically music, encoded in mp3 format. The original company ran into legal difficulties over copyright infringement , had to stop operations and was eventually acquired by Roxio. In its second incarnation Napster became an online music store until it was acquired by Rhapsody from Best Buy on December 1, 2011.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chap 16 Govt 2302

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    8. The rise of Napster in the 1990s and other music exchange services demonstrates 1. that new technologies have made it more difficult for the government to protect property.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Napster introduced a revolutionary change to the way music was distributed conventionally. Music companies worked with the artists to produce music. Thereafter they invested heavily into burning the music CD’s, marketing and advertising of the music and managing the distribution of the music to end customers via retailers. Retailers incurred staffing and real estate and costs. In contrast to this, Napster was able to bring together over 60 Million users who would share their collection of music to the remainder of the user base. In doing so, the reach and range of music distribution was significantly raised. Strong Community Feeling, word of mouth effect and High customer awareness led to low cost of marketing for Napster.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am following up on your letter dated June 8, 2010, where you informed Music Unlimited of your dissatisfaction with your contract and services with our company.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 1

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Person-to-person or P2P networking, Sean Fanning, an 18-year-old student with the nickname ‘the Napster’, was intrigued by the challenge of being able to enable his friends to ‘see’ and share between their own personal record collections. Napster.com did not actually hold any music on its files – but every day millions of swaps were made by people around the world exchanging their music collections. Napster opened a door for many others to reinvent similar software’s or technologies successful iPod personal MP3 player they opened a site called iTunes which offered users a choice of thousands of tracks for download at 99c each. This allowed over 1 billion songs to legally be purchased and downloaded…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company V. Napster Case

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Napster is a very popular web site that allowed many users to share music files. The way that Napster shared music files is through peer-to-peer sharing. These files that are called MP3’s (Motion Picture Expert Group 1, Audio Layer 3: an algorithm that compresses digital music files) were shared between registered users anonymously at no cost to the users. The format of MP3’s reduces the files allowing users to quickly and easily share these files. MP3’s can also be copied multiple times without damaging the quality of the file. Napster allows registered users to download a “Music Share” software that will allow peer-to-peer sharing of the MP3 files. There is a large hub that all registered users had access to through the music sharing software where Napster would manage the download process.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The courts ordered Napster to stop allowing users to download copyrighted material. Napster subsequently shut down its service and filed bankruptcy, giving rise to peer-to-peer computing. The major recording companies filed a lawsuit against two companies offering peer-to-peer software in their pursuit to stop music sharing. In April 2003, the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles ruled in favor of Grokster Ltd and Streamcast Networks, Inc. because they did not have the ability to control or monitor how the users of their product were exchanging files (Vance, 2003). This ruling has since been overturned by the US Supreme Court. The parties settled the lawsuit and both services agreed to stop offering the free file sharing software (RIAA,…

    • 2646 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case takes a look at the Napster company which was launched in 1999 by freshman Shawn Fanning. Napster was later shut down in 2001 due to violations of copyright laws. The Napster;s offerings was later condemned By RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America), a trade group representing the world’s biggest record labels, Universal music, Sony Music, Warner Music, EMI group and Bertelsmann AG.This case study gives a detailed analysis of the creation of Napster and explains why, revolutionary at that point of time, Napster changed the face of the entertainment industry forever.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Two main recording artists Metallica and Dr. Dre have taken actions against Napster. They accused over three hundred thousand people on Napster for music piracy, which means they are stealing songs. There is a huge difference between sharing and stealing. All Napster did was to allow people share songs from one another. At some time somebody had to have bought that recording artists C.D., or it would not have ended up on the Napster network. People who have C.D. burners take it into their own hands to burn them. Burning songs from Napster onto your own C.D. is a copyright infringement, but Napster did not provide C.D. burners in their software the computers people own do. On Napster's web page, there is a warning about the copyright infringement laws. Recording artists feel they are being cheated, but record sales went up 2% since last…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peer-to-Peer technology allows you to share of computer files by exchanging them with other systems. This kind of sharing became popular in the late 90’s with the first site by the name of NAPSTER. Napster changed file sharing because it was accessible for anyone that had an active internet connection. After Napster became so popular, a lot of individuals saw this as a gateway to open more sites to upload and share music files over the internet.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The music recording industry is in trouble. For several years now, sales of new and popular music have steadily declined and show no sign of changing. The record companies are quick to blame the growing popularity of the Internet; music is being traded in a digital form online, often anonymously, with the use of file-sharing programs such as Morpheus, KaZaA, and Imesh, to name a few. The RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) succeeded in disbanding the pioneer Internet file-sharing program, Napster, but is facing confrontation with similar programs that are escaping American copyright laws. While there is an obvious connection between declining popular music sales and increasing file sharing, there is more going on than the RIAA wants to admit. I will show that the recording companies are overpricing their products, and not sufficiently using the Internet as an opportunity to market and sell their products. I shall begin by describing in greater detail the problem that the recording companies are facing, as well as the growing epidemic of online music trading. From there, I will show the correlation between the two and describe the other factors affecting record sales, and how these trends could be turned around to help the industry.…

    • 5602 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Businesses could now make quick business decisions and communicate with other stores that were far away in a matter of minutes rather than weeks or even months…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nipping At Napster

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some people think that it is perfectly fine to download music for free, but the majority of people know that it is illegal to do so. Joe Elliott works in the music industry and states “Napster is a form of theft. No doubt about it.” in a response to letter asking about how artist feel about it. Most people would argue and say that the artist do not care about how their music gets out because even with cutting the middleman out they still get their fair share of pay. The truth is most artist make their music thinking of their fans and try to use their platforms to influence people in a positive ways. It is nowhere near fair that artist are being robbed for their work when they try to help people express themselves through a feeling, a form of art like dance, or part of…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Artists are still making money off of their music being streamed. It's hard for these new artists to get known unless there is a place people could listen to their music for free before they could buy the music. Streaming websites are more helpful than just selling the music for money. It can make them more famous and it could get them more money from the streaming company's advertising there music on their websites also. If someone is famous a lot of people are gonna wanna listen to their music. If they get sold out they can always listen to the music for free and the artists will still make money. Artist can still make a lot of money from them giving there music away for free and the streaming company's can help their growth in the…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays