Preview

Napoleon In Animal Farm

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
839 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Napoleon In Animal Farm
The dictator Napoleon in the novel Animal Farm by George Orwell resembles the current Sudanese Dictator Omar al-Bashir. Napoleon is a pig on Animal Farm who, from the time Mr. Jones was kicked out of the farm, assumed power and took as much control as he could over the farm. Omar al-Bashir has been president of Sudan from 1989 to present day. He is considered one of the most corrupt leaders of all time with seven counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes and is currently the only sitting president with outstanding arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court (ICC) (Watch). However, even with these counts, al-Bashir still leads Sudan as a dictator. Napoleon and al-Bashir are the similar in the ways they came to and keep their …show more content…
Al-bashir has been criticized (how he makes ppl vote for him). Napoleon uses Bluebell and Jessie’s puppies to instill fear into the animals. He uses the puppies as secret police, making the dogs kill whenever an animal protested his reign. made the dogs kill four pigs after they protested his reign. He continuously does this through the book. In al-Bashir's reign, he instilled fear into his own citizens by using his militia, the Janjaweed (Watch). The most infamous war crime of al-Bashir is genocide. He is known with killing members of the Fur, Masalit, and Zaghawa ethnic groups in the Darfur region of Sudan (BBC & Tribune). The genocide has lead to over two-million deaths and four-million displaced people (Watch). Similarly to Napoleon with animals he kills, al-Bashir kills these ethnic groups for little reason. He gives other random reasons of kill such as possessing US dollars (BBC). Al-Bashir has continually made lies such as saying that government funds and oil money were reasons for unrest in Darfur (BBC). abuses his …show more content…
After signing a peace treaty with the Sudan’s People’s Liberation Party, an opposition group, al-Bashir claimed that he signed the treaty due to Sudan’s victories, not because Sudan was in a bad position, which clearly was not the case (BBC). Currently, al-Bashir has an international travel ban issued by the ICC, yet has travelled abroad to many other countries including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and China; he considers himself above the law (Watch & Tribune). Al-Bashir married second woman, a war-widow, to be an example to others and to show that he cares about his soldiers. Both al-Bashir and Napoleon both like to be called by other names that make them sound more in power. Al-bashir likes to be called Your Excellency and Napoleon likes to be called “Father of All Animals, Terror of Mankind, Protector of the Sheepfold, Duckling’s Friend, and the like” (Orwell 100). Napoleon even has his own poem that praises his rule and compares him to “the sun in the sky”, and says that he “watches over all” (Orwell 101). Similarly, al-Bashir calls his regime the ‘Salvation’ regime. These propaganda tactics are used to put both Napoleon and al-Bashir in a better position, so that people do not question their leadership.
Both al-Bashir and Napoleon have had opposition to their rule. Napoleon is still in charge of Animal Farm by the end of Animal Farm and Omar al-Bashir is still the dictator of Sudan today. In 2011, Sudan was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In The Country Of Men

    • 806 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hisham Matar’s 2009 novel, In The Country of Men, offers up the narrative of a child, Suleiman, a boy living under a dictatorship and a family that keeps secrets from him. Through Suleiman, Matar reveals an interpretation of life under a dictatorship through expressing a child’s experiences and views of betrayal and loyalty. Matar symbolizes this child as the nation under a dictatorship. In particular, Matar attempts to further express the transformation of people living under a dictatorship by symbolizing the child, Suleiman’s, through many encounters with betrayals and secrets from his family members, conversion from a naive, ignorant, and subdued boy to an exposed and even malicious and powerful “man”.…

    • 806 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the novel, Animal Farm, written by George Orwell, where there is one specific character, Napoleon, who took a role in this book whom was a natural leader for the sake and future for Animal Farm. Napoleon is a pig who takes upon leadership for all animals, makes roles and differences as before Mr. Jones or Snowball lead the farm, but also acts as if he was a dictator. From these facts about Napoleon, it shows how animal farm will be under circumstances of his actions and his temperament that the farm will face. Napoleon is known as the antagonist in the story, and as for the quote ‘’Napoleon took no interest in Snowball’s committees’’ (Orwell 34). In this quote, it shows Napoleon’s perspective against other leader(s) which he had no interest…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Snowball and Napoleon have two very different personalities and fight for the power from the other animals. Both have their strengths and weaknesses that make them unique as candidates for power. The animals of Animal Farm must pick the candidate that best suits their needs and keeps the animals more powerful than the humans.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This disarmingly intimate memoir delves beyond headlines to bring readers deep into the heart of the Sudanese conflict – and into the flight of three children determined to escape it. It deciphers Sudan’s struggle from the inside. Who is fighting it? Why? Who are the victims? How did these boys survive without food, without family, for so long?…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The name Josef Stalin is very often brought up when talking about dictatorship. In George Orwell’s “Animal Farm”, Napoleon is meant to be an allegory for Stalin. He shows the natural desire for power present in people. Firstly, he kicks out Snowball. Right off the bat, Napoleon is going out of his way to make himself a single dictator. Napoleon knows the power a single dictator…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. The thesis of the article is that Sudan has been politically unstable over the period of its two long civil wars. The south did not identify with the Arab led Sudanese society and created a referendum on southern independence. The two halves of the nation fight in an imminent war killing millions while trying to resolve the issues.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell's Animal Farm is written in the fairy tale style of one of Aesop's fables where it uses animals of an English farm to tell the history of Soviet communism. Napoleon's character is based directly on the communist party leader Joseph Stalin…

    • 744 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During their quest for power, Napoleon and Qaddafi have many resemblances in their rise to power, laws/policies and cruelties. They are both bloodthirsty dictators who sacrifice many innocent lives for their own personal gain. They tear families apart, and cause the death of many to satisfy their lust for the perfect government. They manage to sway many to their ideas and declare themselves the dictator. After all, a revolution is established out of extreme liberty in order to create a dictatorship.…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Animal Farm, the plot goes around the victory of Old Major and the overthrow of Mr.Jones leading to the full overtaking of the farm. After this overthrow Snowball and Napoleon are put in charge over the pigs with the motto “all pigs are equal.” However during this leadership Snowball is run off the farm by Napoleon’s taste for power starting a dictatorship. Therefore takes control of all the animals of the farm. Boxer who had thought about what Napoleon had did spoke his mind saying” if comrade Napoleon says it, it must be right.” From there he adopted the saying “Napoleon is always right” this shows how Napoleon has failed to keep the oath he had made to Old Major, and now is running a communist regime. This shows how Napoleons idea of equality had completely diminished creating alliance with the humans.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abu Ghraib and Insaniyat

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Abu Ghraib is a prison in Baghdad, Iraq. The prison is run by the American military, and in 2001, following the terrorist attacks of Muslim terrorists Abu Ghriab became the site of vicious treatment of Iraqis who were humiliated and tortured by their American captors. The article by Arshin Adib-Moghaddam discusses the various issues around the mistreatment and torture of these captives by the Americans and the impact that behaviour has created in the Muslim world, he looks at the reasons for it and comes to the conclusion that the gap between bashariya and insaniyat is the cause. Adib-Moghaddam defines these words as Ali Shariati had; Bashar “is that particular being that contains physiological characteristics which are share by all humans, regardless of whether they are black, white, yellow, western, religious, or non religious” and Insan differs as it is “a becoming while Bashar is a being”. He explains the evolution from being bashariya to insaniyat, how inherently everyone is a bashar and some are in the process of…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Slavery in Sudan

    • 4811 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Since the successful strife for independence from the UK in 1956 Sudan has been politically ruled by military regimes that favour Islamic orientated governments. Sudan has endured two prolonged civil wars in the remainder of the 20th century. These wars were rooted largely because of Islamic orientated Northern Sudanese dominating the non-Arabic and non-Muslim south. The first civil war broke out just before Sudan reached independence in 1956 but ended in 1972 after southern Sudan was granted the Addis Ababa Accords allowing regional autonomy concerning internal matters. (GlobalSecurity 2011) Civil war erupted again in 1983 - this time the Sudan Peoples Liberation Army fighting against the Sudanese government. This war was the onset of a long line of human rights infringements influencing present day Sudan. The second civil war was largely a continuation of the first caused by South Sudan fighting for independence, but this war was one of the most violent of the late 20th century with a death toll of around 2 million civilians and displacing 4 million South Sudanese forcing them to flee their homes and the country. (Highland 2013) The war eventually ended in 2005 when a Comprehensive Peace Agreement was signed and after six years of autonomy and a referendum South Sudan was granted independence.…

    • 4811 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Darfur Genocide

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    -A current mass slaughter of Darfuri men, women and children that began in the spring of 2003…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Darfur Speech

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Quotation: According to savedarfur.org accessed on June 28, 2007, “After decades of neglect, drought, oppression and small-scale conflicts in Darfur, two rebel groups – the Sudanese Liberation Army/Movement (SLA/M) and the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) – mounted a challenge to Sudan’s president, Omar al-Bashir”.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tracy Reyes Mrs. Frane College Prep Government-Period 0 18 November 2008 Why Should WE Care About the Sudan Civil War? Barack Obama, the President-elect for 2009’s slogan was Change We Need. That slogan does not just end within US boundaries, but extends to the rest of the world. We, as Americans, have an obligation to help. Sudan, Africa’s largest country, is currently dealing with appalling issues that cannot be ignored. The Sudan Civil War, in my opinion, has the MOST impact on world affairs and international relations in the 21st century. The biggest altercation obstructing the different regions from an everlasting peace was the struggle for power. The dominant party of Muslim, wanted to spread their Islamic religion on the rest of Sudan, particularly the South. Resisting converting, the Southern Sudanese made up of about 6 million in rural areas, have had a difficult time keeping strong. The South formed the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) receiving help from a number of various neighboring countries affected by the war (Pike). We are the most powerful nation on Earth. We have the most stake in creating an order in the world that is stable in which people have hope and opportunity and when you see a genocide, whether it is in Rwanda, or Bosnia, or in Darfur, that’s a stain on all of us. That’s a stain on our souls… As president of the United States, I don’t intend to abandon people of turn a blind eye to slaughter (Obama). The Sudan Civil War has been a major influence on foreign affairs. Currently, the United States is supporting the Sudan elections for government in 2009. The US believes that holding a “credible, peaceful, nationwide election” is a way to “achieve a democratic transformation in Sudan” (Sudan). The millions of people that have died based of a struggle for power through religion cannot be overlooked. We can never allow the effects of war dominate. We must create a foreign policy to aid those victims in Sudan being oppressed.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Polgreen it states, “The I.C.C. prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo of Argentina, charges that Bashir has "masterminded and implemented" a plan to destroy the people of Darfur. ‘Al-Bashir organized the destitution, insecurity, and harassment of the survivors,’ he contends. "He did not need bullets. He used other weapons: rapes, hunger, and fear.’” This piece of evidence supports my claim that when under pressure people solve their problems with solutions that aren't that good and don't think of the consequences because it shows how since this letter was so set on winning and getting his country through he decided to put the people that were fighting in danger without thinking it through. He just believed it was the best decision and sent them out there to get raped or hurt without caring of the people are his consequences.In other words, this quote shows how this leader relied on fear and hurting on other people to rule and it affected a lot of people instead of helping to solve issues. According to Polgreen it states, “"Some people have said that for me to intervene at this point is shocking," he says. "I say what is going on now is shocking. Genocide is going on now, and it is endangering the lives of many more people.’” This piece of evidence supports my claim because it shows how at the time this…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays