Preview

Myrtle Ruby Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
455 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Myrtle Ruby Case Study
On November 30th of 1986, David Lee Lewis had broken into the Lufkin home of Myrtle Ruby in attempt to steal guns that were inside of her home. The unsuspecting victim was fatally shot with a .22-caliber rifle after returning home from choir practice at her church. David Lee Lewis claims that he was under the influence of drugs and alcohol at the time of the shooting. He also claims that he did not intentionally aim the gun at Mrs. Ruby, but aimed it in the general direction due to being startled by Mrs. Ruby's' arrival. No matter the excuses given, David Lewis still took a person’s life. On April 7 of 1987, David Lee Lewis was found guilty and sentenced to death row for the shooting death of Mrs. Myrtle Ruby.
In 1993, his murder conviction was reversed due to “notes from the trial being lost,” but in his second
…show more content…
Mrs. Ruby was taken away from her family, her friends and her church congregation. Her life now can only be remembered and mourned but can never be brought back. Mrs. Ruby's' murderer, David Lee Lewis, made the following statement concerning execution,
“[He] thinks (the way they should execute you) should be by your choice – lethal injection, firing squad, hanging or gas chamber”
In all reality no criminal who takes a life should be given the right to do anything especially by choosing how he or she is executed. David Lee Lewis unquestionably deserves the sentence handed to him. He however, should not be allowed to have so many appeals filed. The appeals are only prolonging his execution, which serves no justice to Mrs. Ruby nor her family. The way it should be seen is that, Myrtle Ruby was not given any options on living or dying on that November day in 1986, so why should her murderer be given so many attempts of prolonging his life or the chance to live out his life when he took

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    So it wasn’t like she was near death. November 19th 1993, she was supposed to attend another surgery for her hip but on October 24th 1993, around a moth before, he father decided he would take her life. Before being confronted by police Mr. Latimer stated that his daughter had died in her sleep, but when police came with autopsy evidence he confessed by saying he had killed her in his truck. By putting a hose in the exhaust to where Tracy was. He also said that he thought of other ways to kill her, by making her overdose or by shooting her in her head.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ultimate decision of the Court was to reverse the murder conviction; stating that the act of his murder was brought on by the victims repeated taunting and abuse toward Berry. The Court found that the evidence of infidelity and teasing could be enough to rule his conviction and “Heat of Passion.”…

    • 377 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After suffering a trial court conviction of second-degree murder for the bludgeoning death of his pregnant wife, Sam Sheppard challenged the verdict as the product of an unfair trial. Sheppard, who maintained his innocence of the crime, alleged that the trial judge failed to protect him from the massive, widespread, and prejudicial publicity…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With that being said, an individual should be allowed to oppose the death penalty for what ever their reason. At the same time it took these cases through trail to see that not necessarily a flawed system, but that a juror should represent the whole population, instead of limiting it to a so called subgroup…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    R. V. Latimer Case Study

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to the events depicted in R.v. Latimer 1994 On October 24 1993 Mrs. Latimer and her 3 children were out to Sunday church during that time Robert Latimer and Tracy Latimer were at…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My view upon death penalty before watching the video about Darryl hunt’s case, was strongly against it. I truly believe that we have no say in who is to take someone’s life. Who are we to decide who lives or dies? There is no standard that we can place on someone’s life, to determine their existence in this world. Life is a precious gift, no matter how cruel the crime may be that the person being accused of committing the crime. I strongly believe that incarceration for the reminder of their life is in my view, the most extreme decision as a society to make in determining an individuals future.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacco And Venzetti Essay

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    was found guilty of this crime and it was detrimental to the murder case. Not only was…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay shows us what we would uncover if we saw where the government was being completely transparent. In “Executions Should be Televised” the question of how some people are executed comes up. In “The Death Penalty,” Bruck answers that question when he writes about a man named Joseph Carl Shaw, a former military policeman who helped murder two teenagers while suffering from a mental illness and being high off of PCP (Bruck 490). Shaw was executed by the electric chair, a contraption that was built over 100 years ago (Bruck 490). With today’s medical advancements and technologies however, there are plenty of ways to perform an execution that does not cause severe pain. By executing a man in such a barbaric way, Bruck shows the reader how their constitutional right defined by the 8th amendment, that “cruel and unusual punishments [should not be] inflicted,” is being ignored (“Bill of Rights of the United States of…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rubout Argument Analysis

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Here, we must answer both possibilities with an if-then argument. If (1) was true, then constitution-wise, it’s unquestionably wrong. This one can go a long way. First, the judge didn’t ask for their opinion for justice. In fact, the two we’re still going to have a trial. And by the new law—the death sentence has been, so to speak, rubbed-out. For if they killed the two for moral reasons like vigilantes would reason-out, then again it’s still wrong for no one has the right to put the law in his/her own hands.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some cases can lead you to having no sympathy on the inmate at all, in a matter of fact it can leave the victims family members relieved knowing the murderer is going through the death penalty. Jacob Sullum talks about this point, while speaking out about a man by the name of Robert Alton Harris. Robert Harris was known for his technique of tricking the victims, he would tell them that he would not kill them but as soon as they looked relieved he would shoot them. Sullum believes that this man, like many, does not deserve to live and should go through the death penalty (Gottfried 37). A senate on the judiciary also commented on this matter, saying, “people who commit violent crimes have forfeited their own right to life,” (Gottfried 37). A…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the age of 17, he was charged with the robbery and shooting of Bobby Lambert. His guilt largely relied on the statement of only one observer that claimed she saw the killer's face for a brief second through her car windshield, 30 to 40 feet away. “Judge Trevathan concluded that Skillen’s identification of Graham at trial was “based solely on [her] independent recollection of the facts as they occurred on May 13, 1981,” and was “made independently of any conversation or processes that were performed by members of the Houston Police Department.” He therefore allowed her to testify.” (Capital Punhiment in Context). Two workers from the grocery store were also witnesses, who seen the assailant at close view. They stated that Graham was not the killer however, Graham’s attorney never interviewed them nor, called as witnesses to testify. Three of the jurors who voted to convict Graham signed affidavits saying they would have voted differently had all the evidence been available. (Capital Punhiment in Context). Gary graham was an innocent man killed at the hands of the government and the country. The government need to find new and effective way to determine built without any doubt when taking away a…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furman v. Georgia Nicholas, 4 Furman v. Georgia: The Death Penalty Ethan Nicholas Liberty High School AP Government 4A Furman v. Georgia was one of the many court cases that dealt with the death penalty. This time, the topic of the death penalty was reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1972. This particular case ruled that the death penalty was cruel and unusual punishment violating the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. ? The ban on ?cruel and unusual punishments? is one of the most difficult to translate into judicially manageable terms,? stated Chief Justice Burger about the death penalty (Furman V. Georgia, 1972).…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Years later his mother, Doreen Lawrence is still campaigning to gain justice over her son’s unlawful death as Stephen’s killers were never convicted. The death of Stephen had opened people’s eyes and many attended the memorial to mark the anniversary. Mrs Lawrence was appalled at the way the case was handled the police dragged it out and it took too long and no real evidence was found to convict the culprits. But now a lot later on after the murder the policing system has changed greatly.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    It took four hours for them jurors to come back with a guilty verdicts on Couey, the subject was a convicted sex offender already before the murder of the victim he had admitted before the trial he had killed Lunsford. His confession was thrown out by the judge because the police had made an error by not having a lawyer present during his confession although the psychologist testified that Couey showed signs of mental illness and retardation. The jury that convicted him convened again the trial sentencing phase recommended that he be put to death a recommended by Judge Richard Howard for his part.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assisted Suicide

    • 2646 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “I propose that a prisoner condemned to death by due process of law be allowed to submit, by his own free choice, to medical experimentation under complete anesthesia (at the time appointed for administering the penalty) as a form of execution in lieu of conventional methods prescribed by law”.…

    • 2646 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays