My Career Plan
German Economic Review 9(4): 402–430
A Ranking of Journals in Economics and Related Fields
Klaus Ritzberger
Vienna Graduate School of Finance and Institute for Advanced Studies
Abstract. This paper presents an update of the ranking of economics journals by the invariant method, as introduced by Palacio-Huerta and Volij, with a broader sample of journals. By comparison with the two other most prominent rankings, it also proposes a list of ‘target journals’, ranked according to their quality, as a standard for the field of economics. JEL classification: A12, A14. Keywords: Journal ranking; economics journals; business administration journals; finance journals, citations.
1. INTRODUCTION
The ranking of professional journals in economics has attracted growing ´ interest during the past decade (see Kalaitzidakis et al., 2003; Koczy and Strobel, 2007; Kodrzycki and Yu, 2006; Laband and Piette, 1994; Liebowitz and Palmer, 1984; Liner and Amin, 2006; Palacio-Huerta and Volij, 2004). Journal rankings have been used to evaluate the research performance of economics departments (e.g. Bommer and Ursprung, 1998; Combes and Linnemer, 2003; Lubrano et al., 2003) and of individual economists (e.g. ´ Coupe, 2003). They provide ‘objective’ information about the quality of publications in a world where academic publications have reached an overwhelming extent and variety. While half a century ago a well-trained economist may have comprehended all key developments in economics at large, today it is difficult to follow even the pace of subfields. Thus, the judgment by an individual academic is accurate only in so far as it concerns her or his own field of specialization. Still, hiring, tenure, promotion and funding decisions should ideally be based on judgments of scientific quality, even when expertise about the specializations of all candidates is unavailable. For that reason economists have turned to journal rankings as a substitute for a direct judgment of scientific quality of
A Ranking of Journals in Economics and Related Fields
Klaus Ritzberger
Vienna Graduate School of Finance and Institute for Advanced Studies
Abstract. This paper presents an update of the ranking of economics journals by the invariant method, as introduced by Palacio-Huerta and Volij, with a broader sample of journals. By comparison with the two other most prominent rankings, it also proposes a list of ‘target journals’, ranked according to their quality, as a standard for the field of economics. JEL classification: A12, A14. Keywords: Journal ranking; economics journals; business administration journals; finance journals, citations.
1. INTRODUCTION
The ranking of professional journals in economics has attracted growing ´ interest during the past decade (see Kalaitzidakis et al., 2003; Koczy and Strobel, 2007; Kodrzycki and Yu, 2006; Laband and Piette, 1994; Liebowitz and Palmer, 1984; Liner and Amin, 2006; Palacio-Huerta and Volij, 2004). Journal rankings have been used to evaluate the research performance of economics departments (e.g. Bommer and Ursprung, 1998; Combes and Linnemer, 2003; Lubrano et al., 2003) and of individual economists (e.g. ´ Coupe, 2003). They provide ‘objective’ information about the quality of publications in a world where academic publications have reached an overwhelming extent and variety. While half a century ago a well-trained economist may have comprehended all key developments in economics at large, today it is difficult to follow even the pace of subfields. Thus, the judgment by an individual academic is accurate only in so far as it concerns her or his own field of specialization. Still, hiring, tenure, promotion and funding decisions should ideally be based on judgments of scientific quality, even when expertise about the specializations of all candidates is unavailable. For that reason economists have turned to journal rankings as a substitute for a direct judgment of scientific quality of
References: Arrow, K. J. (1963), Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn, John Wiley and Sons, New York. Aumann, R. J. (1964), ‘Markets with a Continuum of Traders’, Econometrica 32, 39–50. Blank, R. M. (1991), ‘The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from the American Economic Review’, American Economic Review 81, 1041–1067. Bommer, R. and H. W. Ursprung (1998), ‘Spieglein, Spieglein an der Wand – Eine publikationsanalytische Erfassung der Forschungsleistungen volkswirtschaftlicher ¨ ¨r Fachbereiche in Deutschland, Osterreich und der Schweiz’, Zeitschrift fu Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 118, 1–28. Bradley, R. A. and M. E. Terry (1952), ‘Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons’, Biometrika 39, 324–345. ¨ Braun, T. W., W. Glanzel and A. Schubert (2005), ‘A Hirsch-Type Index for Journals’, The Scientist 19, 8. Brin, S. and L. Page (1998), ‘The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine’, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30, 107–117. Combes, P.-P. and L. Linnemer (2003), ‘Where are the Economists Who Publish? Publication Concentration and Rankings in Europe Based on Cumulative Publications’, Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 1250–1308. ´ Coupe, T. (2003), ‘Revealed Performance: Worldwide Rankings of Economists and Economics Departments, 1990–2000’, Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 1309–1345. Daudt, H. and D. W. Rae (1976), ‘The Ostrogorski Paradox: A Peculiarity of Compound Majority Decision’, European Journal of Political Research 4, 391–399. Garfield, E. (1955), ‘Citation Indexes to Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas’, Science 122, 108–111. Hirsch, J. E. (2004), ‘An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, 16569–16572. Hirst, G. (1978), ‘Discipline Impact Factor: A Method of Determining Core Journal Lists’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 29, 171–172. Hurwicz, L. (1973), ‘The Design of Resource Allocation Mechanisms’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 58, 1–30. Jemec, G. B. (2001), ‘Impact Factor to Assess Academic Output’, The Lancet 358, 1373. r 2008 The Author ¨ Journal Compilation r Verein fur Socialpolitik and Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2008 429 K. Ritzberger Kalaitzidakis, P., T. P. Mamuneas and T. Stengo (2003), ‘Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions in Economics’, Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 1346– 1366. ´ Koczy, L. A. and M. Strobel (2007), ‘The Ranking of Economics Journals by a Tournament Method’, mimeo. Kodrzycki, Y. K. and P. Yu (2006), ‘New Approaches to Ranking Economic Journals’, Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy 5, Art. 24. Koenig, M. E. D. (1982), ‘Determinants of Expert Judgement of Research Performance’, Scientometrics 4, 361–378. Laband, D. N. and M. J. Piette (1994), ‘The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970–1990’, Journal of Economic Literature 32, 640–666. Leydesdorff, L. (2004), ‘Top-Down Decomposition of the Journal Citation Report of the Social Science Citation Index: Graph- and Factor-Analytic Approaches’, Scientometrics 60, 159–180. Liebowitz, S. J. and J. C. Palmer (1984), ‘Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals’, Journal of Economic Literature 22, 77–88. Lindsey, D. (1978), ‘The Corrected Quality Ratio: A Composite Index of Scientific Contributions to Knowledge’, Social Studies of Science 8, 349–354. Liner, G. H. and M. Amin (2006), ‘Methods of Ranking Economics Journals’, Atlantic Economics Journal 32, 140–149. Lubrano, M., L. Bauwens, A. Kirman and C. Protopopescu (2003), ‘Ranking Economics Departments in Europe: A Statistical Approach’, Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 1367–1401. Nash, J. F. (1950), ‘Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36, 48–49. Palacio-Huerta, I. and O. Volij (2004), ‘The Measurement of Intellectual Influence’, Econometrica 72, 963–977. Pieters, R. and H. Baumgartner (2002), ‘Who Talks to Whom? Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication of Economics Journals’, Journal of Economic Literature 40, 483–509. Ritzberger, K. (2007), ‘Eine invariante Bewertung wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften’, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 9, 267–285. Serrano, R. (2004), ‘The Measurement of Intellectual Influence: The Views of a Sceptic’, Working Paper No. 2004-02, Brown University. Sombatsompop, N., T. Markpin and N. Premkamolnetr (2004), ‘A Modified Method for Calculating the Impact Factor of Journals in ISI Journal Citation Reports: Polymer Science Category in 1997–2001’, Scientometrics 60, 217–235. Stiegler, G. J., S. M. Stiegler and C. Friedland (1995), ‘The Journals of Economics’, Journal of Political Economy 103, 331–359. 430 r 2008 The Author ¨ Journal Compilation r Verein fur Socialpolitik and Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2008