Mr Wong
Asian Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, 23–34, January 2007
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN MALAYSIA: THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE REFORMS AND STATE BUSINESS RELATION IN MALAYSIA
Nor Azizah Zainal Abidin 1 and Halimah @ Nasibah Ahmad2
1
Faculty of Public Management and Law, 2 Faculty of Accountancy Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
ABSTRACT
The Asian Financial Crisis in 1997 not only introduced the term of corporate governance but also drew attention of the public about the weaknesses of Malaysian corporate governance practice. After 1998, Malaysian government decided to adopt corporate reform that could enhance the quality of good corporate management practice. This reform is clearly stated in the code and rules of corporate governance. The purpose of this research is to study the significance of implementing the code and rules of corporate governance since the public already realize the close relationship between business and politics. Three companies were chosen as indicators for this study. As a result, it was found that companies which are involved in corporate malpractice but have good relationship with states will always be excluded from the legal corporate action. Keywords: corporate governance, corporate reforms, political economy, state business relation
INTRODUCTION Asian Financial Crisis in 1997 not only introduced the term of corporate governance but also drew attention of the public about the weaknesses of Malaysian corporate governance practice. After 1998, Malaysian government decided to adopt corporate reforms that could enhance the quality of good corporate management practice. This included the introduction of the new Malaysian code and rules for corporate governance. The debate of corporate governance in Malaysia are often limited to agencies involved directly in law enforcement such as the Ministry of Finance, Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE),1 Securities Commission (SC) and Registrar of Company. On
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN MALAYSIA: THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE REFORMS AND STATE BUSINESS RELATION IN MALAYSIA
Nor Azizah Zainal Abidin 1 and Halimah @ Nasibah Ahmad2
1
Faculty of Public Management and Law, 2 Faculty of Accountancy Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
ABSTRACT
The Asian Financial Crisis in 1997 not only introduced the term of corporate governance but also drew attention of the public about the weaknesses of Malaysian corporate governance practice. After 1998, Malaysian government decided to adopt corporate reform that could enhance the quality of good corporate management practice. This reform is clearly stated in the code and rules of corporate governance. The purpose of this research is to study the significance of implementing the code and rules of corporate governance since the public already realize the close relationship between business and politics. Three companies were chosen as indicators for this study. As a result, it was found that companies which are involved in corporate malpractice but have good relationship with states will always be excluded from the legal corporate action. Keywords: corporate governance, corporate reforms, political economy, state business relation
INTRODUCTION Asian Financial Crisis in 1997 not only introduced the term of corporate governance but also drew attention of the public about the weaknesses of Malaysian corporate governance practice. After 1998, Malaysian government decided to adopt corporate reforms that could enhance the quality of good corporate management practice. This included the introduction of the new Malaysian code and rules for corporate governance. The debate of corporate governance in Malaysia are often limited to agencies involved directly in law enforcement such as the Ministry of Finance, Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE),1 Securities Commission (SC) and Registrar of Company. On
References: Blair, M. M. (1995). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. Washington DC: The Brookings Institute. Cadbury, A. (1993). Thought on corporate governance. International Review, January, 5–10. Das, D. K. (2000). Corporate punishment: Disciplining enterprise in crisis affected Asia economies. Australian National University: Asia Pacific Press. Gomez, E. T. (1990). Politics in business: UMNO 's corporate investments. Kuala Lumpur: Forum. . (1994). Political business: Corporate involvement of Malaysia political parties. Cairns: James Cook University Press. . (2001). Bailout or accountability: Spending billions on United Engineers Malaysia looks suspiciously like help for Malay businessmen. The Asian Wall Street Journal, July, 26. . (2002). Political business in Malaysia: Party factionalism, corporate development and economic crisis. In E. T. Gomez (Ed.). Political business in East Asia. London: Routledge. 19 Basic principles of corporate governance such as transparency, fairness and trustworthiness were not implemented. 33 Nor Azizah Zainal Abidin and Halimah@Nasibah Ahmad Gomez, E. T., & Jomo, K.S. (1999). Malaysia 's political economy: Politics, patronage and profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Halim Wahab. (2003). All eyes on the code. Malaysian Business, July 16. Fauziah Ismail. (2000). Naluri sells MAS stake to MOF Inc for RM1.79b. Business Times, December 21. Finance Committee on Corporate Governance. (1999). Report on corporate governance. Kuala Lumpur: Finance Committee on Corporate Governance. Financial Times. (2002, April 1). Chronology of the Perwaja collapse. Jayasankaran, S. (1999). Shock, horror. Far Eastern Economic Review, July 8. . (2003). Turning back the clock. Far Eastern Economic Review, April 24. Jomo, K. S. et al. (Eds.). (1986). In Mehmet, Ozay. Pagar makan padi: Amanah, kemiskinan dan kekayaan dalam pembangunan Malaysia di bawah Dasar Ekonomi Baru. Kuala Lumpur: Insan. Lee Leok Soon. (2003). Misgovernance – Who is to be blamed. Smart Investors, 40– 43. Low Chee Keong (Ed.). (2000). Corporate governance in Malaysia. In Financial markets in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Law Journal. Lennane, A. (1997). Tall order as haze hovers over MAS. Airfinance Journal, 26– 30. MASSA. (1999, April 17). Kuasa 25 korporat Melayu yang berpengaruh. Monks, A. C., & Minow, N. (1995). Corporate governance. Cambridge: Blackwell Business. Netto, A. (2004). Tycoons arrest boosts corruption crusade. Asia Times, February 11. Nor Azizah Zainal Abidin. (2004). Tadbir urus korporat di Malaysia: Reformasi dasar kerajaan dan hubungan politik dan perniagaan. Master 's thesis , University of Malaya. Ranawana, A. (2000). The $1.3-billion man: Halim looks for cash to buy most of the Renong. Asiaweek, 26(43). Thomas, T. (2002). Corporate finance and debt in the Malaysian financial crisis of 1997. In Corporate Governance in Asia: Lessons From the Financial Crisis, Malaysia: UNDP. Yong, D., Wong, R., Chong, E., Lim, Y. P., & Chan, T. H. (1991). The biggest reverse takeover in local history. The Star, March 25. Yusof Abu Othman. (2000). A voice of minority shareholders: What 's the minority shareholders watchdog group. Bulletin of Securities Industries Development Centre, August. 34