Preview

Most Common Leadership Skills

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1889 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Most Common Leadership Skills
Most common Leadership Types are:
- Autocratic leadership.
- Bureaucratic leadership.
- Charismatic leadership.
- Democratic leadership or participative leadership.
- Laissez-faire leadership.
- People-oriented leadership or relations-oriented leadership.
- Servant leadership.
- Task-oriented leadership.
- Transactional leadership.
- Transformational leadership. Autocratic Leadership
Autocratic leadership is an extreme form of transactional leadership, where a leader exerts high levels of power over his or her employees or team members. People within the team are given few opportunities for making suggestions, even if these would be in the team's or organization's interest. Most people tend to resent being treated like this. Because of this, autocratic leadership usually leads to high levels of absenteeism and staff turnover. Also, the team's output does not benefit from the creativity and experience of all team members, so many of the benefits of teamwork are lost. For some routine and unskilled jobs, however, this style can remain effective where the advantages of control outweigh the disadvantages. Bureaucratic Leadership
Bureaucratic leaders "work by the book", ensuring that their staff follow procedures exactly. This is a very appropriate style for work involving serious safety risks (such as working with machinery, with toxic substances or at heights) or where large sums of money are involved (such as cash-handling). In other situations, the inflexibility and high levels of control exerted can demoralize staff, and can diminish the organizations ability to react to changing external circumstances. Charismatic Leadership
A charismatic leadership style can appear similar to a transformational leadership style, in that the leader injects huge doses of enthusiasm into his or her team, and is very energetic in driving others forward. However, a charismatic leader can tend to believe more in him or herself than in their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Conger, J. and Kanungo, R. (1987). Toward a behavioural theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), p.637-647.…

    • 3302 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Autocratic leader benefits those employees who require close supervision. Creative employees who thrive in group functions detest this leadership style.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bennett J GB600 unit2

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A charismatic leader is defined as an individual who is a very skilled communicator that has the ability to communicate to others on a deep, emotional level. This type of leader is able to articulate a compelling or captivating vision and is able to arouse strong emotions in others (Riggio, 2012). In an organization, a charismatic leader can “manipulate’ their team with their ability to collect individuals with like traits and goals that foster extraordinary performance metrics. Charismatics leaders gathers team support due to their personality and charm of how people follow them and traits in their leadership style. This type of leader is consistently able to help the organization achieve a strong loyalty, respect, and sense if determination from employees. By communicating an optimistic vision for the future of the organization, a charismatic leader inspires employees to work hard to create that future. Charismatic leaders are considered to be self-confident, goal oriented, positive thinkers, great communicators, and fun loving (Muston, 2014).…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever, knowing, made choices based on how that person engaged you and made you think? Charismatic Leadership involves creating a self-image so powerful that people are naturally drawn to you. Some even say it’s (Christianity) an extraordinary power granted by the Holy Spirit.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Level 3 Unit 5 P1

    • 4371 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The Charismatic Leader gathers followers through dint of personality and charm, rather than any form of external power or authority.…

    • 4371 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shaun

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Boal, K.B., & Bryson, J.M. (1988). Charismatic Leadership: A Phenomenological and Structural Approach. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    | Laissez-faire leadership is not ideal in situations where group members lack the knowledge or experience they need to complete tasks and make decisions. Some people are not good at setting their own deadlines, managing their own projects and solving problems on their own. In such situations, projects can go off-track and deadlines can be missed when team members do not get enough guidance or feedback from leaders.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Services

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Example of an autocratic leadership style: Surrey Police and a specialist bomb disposal team arrived on the scene after the suspicious device was found at 3.30pm A specialist Explosive Ordinance Disposal team took the shell to Lammas Park in Staines. The park was evacuated before a controlled explosion was carried out on the shell at 7.30pm. The blast could be heard from miles around, according to residents. See More. [3]…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Charismatic leader has the ability to draw others to his side and move them to…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, Dawson (2006:9) argues that there are three essential features of a charismatic leader, “first, charismatic authority is rooted in the display of exceptional abilities by an individual”.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Leadership Impact Paper

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charismatic leaders will try to set a goal and good work environment for their workers (Fischer). The leaders of an organization will have to ensure they use the right behavior to motivate its workers. In Psalm 28:11 David asks to be taught the Lords way and be lead in a straight path. I think this is how a lot of employees feel and it is the job of the leaders to ensure they know what path the organization is going.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It goes without saying that human beings couldn’t have achieved what they have achieved if they had not worked in groups. Teamwork is probably one of the most important “inventions” of mankind which does not get explicitly mentioned when one refers about the tools and evolution of human beings from the pre-historic times. None of the magnificent creations of human beings we see today could have been possibly achieved without humans coming in teams and working for a common goal. Teams by themselves cannot be successful if they do not have a clear direction or vision. The team is bound to fail in achieving the results if there is no coordination, synchronisation and communication between team members. The concept of team itself comes into existence only because of the arising of a necessity or a goal that would benefit the society, and the means to achieve it cannot be implemented by an individual, however able and skilful he or she may be. Members of the team can be of extremely different personalities, skills and characteristics and every member has his/her own ideas on how to achieve the common goal. It is precisely at this point that the need for a leader arises. What is required is a leader who can channel the necessary skills from the team members towards the common goal and maintain the harmony and coordination between them at the same time. Numerous theories have been postulated on how a leader should be and what the characteristics of the leader should be. Some theories hypothesised that leaders cannot be made…

    • 2690 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Post-bureaucratic practices in leadership have branched from bureaucratic leadership practices (Grahn 2008). Current leadership practices have grown into a hybridization of democratic principles and bureaucratic forms (Josserand, Teo & Clegg 2006), and continue to grow further from bureaucratic leadership methods. As such, we examine traditional leadership theories and explore its roots to bureaucracy. Firstly I evaluate the movement from the trait theory by calling on the views of Galton contrasted to Conger & Kanugo (1994) and House & Aditya (1997). Following this is an examination of Rosen’s (2008) article that exhibit soft power controls as links to bureaucratic procedures of the behavioral theory. Adding upon the criticisms of democratic…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic I (A1). The leader takes a decision completely at his discretion without the knowledge or consent of the team members in this style of leadership. This style of decision making is possible only in cases where there is not a lot at stake with the out come of this decision, when the employees’ decision is not exactly crucial for the outcome…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hrd in India

    • 4781 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Editorial Continued from Page 2 Charismatic leaders tend to use unconventional and out-of-the-ordinary means to achieve organizational goals. Such behaviours should also be perceived to have high probability of harming the leader 's own selfinterest. Mahatma Gandhi 's momentous "Salt March" and "Fast unto Death" are ever shining examples of such behaviour. This is not to say that charismatic leaders are foolhardy. They have "realistic assessments of environmental resources and constraints affecting the realization of their visions. They implement innovative strategies when the environmental resource constraint ratio is favourable to them." In addition, charismatic leaders often use rhetoric that reflects expertise, assertiveness, and concern for followers ' needs. Such are the patterns of abilities, interests, and personal traits of charismatic leaders which can in fact be objectively studied. But can charismatic leadership be learned? Conger and Kanungo think so. They offer suggestions for identifying potentially charismatic leaders within organizations and developing them through training in various skill areas, such as critical evaluation, communication, and empowering other members of the organization. But beware followers. Be on guard against idiolization of your leader! Sasi Misra…

    • 4781 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays