Morality Theory Summary
Humans tend to ignore what is within their environs and how it might influence their lives. Some act out of ignorance while others are naïve of how the things they interact with may impact their lives. This project is meant to evaluate the perception of humans on various aspects of life that they encounter on a day to day life. The survey instrument is all inclusive as it contains all the things that a typical human being interact with in a normal day. All persons are covered in the survey regardless of the gender, race, ethnicity or religion. However, the extensive scale of evaluating the things that humans interact necessitates grouping of data for valid results and conclusions. Many are the time's people overlook how they feel over their
…show more content…
Time, on the other hand, dictates whether one exists on the traditional, modern or even post-modernism prisms. Some people have an easy time transitioning from one prism to another as the technology advances, and this is subject to whether the foundation of moral identity change. Anderson argues that a shift in the foundations of morality will cause a similar shift in the foundations of identity. This is what dictates the best time to change from the modernism prism to the postmodernism prisms to fit within the given moral and ethical standards. Change cannot only be effective if humans are ready to leave culture wars behind and instead focus on how to achieve the goals at hand. The ability to define ethics and morality defines whether people are willing to transition from one stage of life to …show more content…
Elliott (2015), on the other hand, asserts that humans need to own and face their identity troubles before resulting to embrace changes in the social world. However, this may extend to a point where one has to bypass and ignore their various aspects of the renown and natural realm of facts to focus on what is needed to initiate change. According to the survey, owning up things such as a TV, an automobile and an Apple watch are luxuries which fall under the category of secondary needs. However, to stay trendy and up to date, one may be forced to change their long-held perception about the idea of digitalization and globalization. Consequently, this requires an individual to adjust their personal desires to fit into the digital
Time, on the other hand, dictates whether one exists on the traditional, modern or even post-modernism prisms. Some people have an easy time transitioning from one prism to another as the technology advances, and this is subject to whether the foundation of moral identity change. Anderson argues that a shift in the foundations of morality will cause a similar shift in the foundations of identity. This is what dictates the best time to change from the modernism prism to the postmodernism prisms to fit within the given moral and ethical standards. Change cannot only be effective if humans are ready to leave culture wars behind and instead focus on how to achieve the goals at hand. The ability to define ethics and morality defines whether people are willing to transition from one stage of life to …show more content…
Elliott (2015), on the other hand, asserts that humans need to own and face their identity troubles before resulting to embrace changes in the social world. However, this may extend to a point where one has to bypass and ignore their various aspects of the renown and natural realm of facts to focus on what is needed to initiate change. According to the survey, owning up things such as a TV, an automobile and an Apple watch are luxuries which fall under the category of secondary needs. However, to stay trendy and up to date, one may be forced to change their long-held perception about the idea of digitalization and globalization. Consequently, this requires an individual to adjust their personal desires to fit into the digital