Preview

Morality and Power

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
959 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Morality and Power
Thucydides ' written history of the Mytilenian Debate and the Melian Dialogue reflects the reality of a period where morality is dependent on the exercise of power and those who possess it. The main theme running through the course of these two debates is that those with the power to act as they wish inherently have the power to dictate morality. The arguments that decide the fate of the Mytilene are made not strictly on the basis of morality but on how their power allows them to exercise the moral course they choose. The Melian dialogue reveals how those in power can dictate morality in terms of self-interest. Both cases also demonstrate how morality is also a function of self-interest. The question of the relationship between power and morality also hinges on the definition of these two vague terms. Morality, in the broader sense of moral order, has been defined as "a set of rules which define what is right and wrong." (Outka and Reeder, p.5) Who decides what is right and wrong often depends, as with Thucydides ' history, on who has the power in a given situation. Power can broadly be defined, as the capacity to achieve what one wants. (Dickerson and Flanagan, p.24) In the case of these two debates, the Athenians were the party who possessed the power. They had the coercive ability to decide the fates of both the Melians and the Mytilenians. This power was derived strictly from the military might their empire was able to build up. In both cases, power allowed them to dictate morality to the inferior parties. Thucydides ' history of the Mytilenian debate details the discussion of a council deciding on how to punish the citizens of Mytilene for a failed revolt. The two options on the table are to either slaughter all the inhabitants, as had been previously agreed upon, or to leave them without severe punishment. Cleon, the Athenian responsible of initially deciding to slaughter Mytilene, argued that it was necessary to take his brutal course of action for


Cited: Dickerson, Mark and Flanagan, Thomas "Government and Politics" Scarbourough, Ontario: ITP Nelson, 1998 Outka, Gene and Reeeder, John "Religion and Morality" New York: Anchor Books ,1973 Thucydides "History of the Peloponnesian War" Toronto: Penguin Books, 1972

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper we will show that Glaucon and Thrasymachus' positions on justice are entirely different. We argue that Thrasymachus despite his slippage and confusion between a traditional and immoralist definition of justice, is really intending to illustrate a political system ruled by a rational-minded and exploitative tyrant. On the other hand Glaucon clearly presents justice as a necessary evil originating out of a social contract constructed by the weak of society. He then challenges Socrates to prove to him that the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This piece is crucial in Thucydides work as it showcases many themes and messages and how they connect to the big-picture of life and civilization. The theme of this document is the democratic nature of the city-state because it displays what Athens has to offer as well as how civilians are willing to represent the state in return.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Sophocles’ Antigone, two notions of ‘justice’ are presented, which conflict with each other. Creon’s form of justice rewards the loyal Eteocles and punishes the traitor Polyneices, by refusing to give Polyneices proper burial rites. This form of justice directly conflicts with Antigone’s idea of justice, which doesn’t differentiate between the “wicked” and the “just.” These two conflicting thoughts on justice illustrate two classic philosophies. Creon represents a Paramenidean view of justice, while Antigone represents a Heraclitean view of justice.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rome vs. Athens

    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Roman republic and Athenian polis were two great experiments in political philosophy in the ancient world. These two distinctly different methods of running a nation in both Athens and Rome have one similarity – that they were founded on the intent to give common law and justice to the people. That aside both of the nations, which will be discussed in this essay, was culturally, economically and historically quite different and approached the issue of statecraft in a very different and sometimes contradictory manner. Both of these republics – the Roman and Athenian were regarded to be in their time two of the most powerful nations in the world – the Roman republic after the 2nd Punic war and the Athenian republic at the age of its most famous ruler Pericles. But how did these two nations, so different in their approach to life and philosophy itself, fall ultimately by their own system, which had served them for so long? They fell to the oligarchies that they were built and inte The Roman and Athenian republican both had a loathing (perhaps the Roman more so) for kingship and oligarchy in any of its forms. The republic fell to the whims of dictators such as the Triumvirs, Caesar and Sulla who abused its system, and Athens fell prey to tyrants using the turmoil after the Peloponnesian war to their advantage. One major similarity between the two nations is that they both had a growing degree of imperialism late in their republican period. The Athenian, abusing the rewards of the Delian league built to defend the common interest of Greece against the Persian empire, ended up with an empire which its’ small and inefficient form of statecraft was not equipped to manage. The Roman also found the same issue, which arose, like the Athenians, initially from a need for simple, honest self-defense. The two quotes below indicate the troubled and desperate issues that lead to the creation of these…

    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Undeniably, the ancient Greek society places a heavy emphasis on values and traditions. The two texts of the “Clouds” by Aristophanes and “History of the Peloponnesian war” by Thucydides, although contextually divergent, are actually conceptually convergent. Both texts are built around the central theme of the collapse of conventional values. While the breakdown of traditional values in the “History of the Peloponnesian war” is presented in a more metaphorical and symbolical manner, the downfall of conventional values in the “Clouds” is on a more direct basis. Although both texts essentially convey across the same solemn message that the relinquishment of traditional values leads to dire consequences, Aristophanes also implicitly challenges the authority of old values, and hopes to improve upon these traditions.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the struggle between Creon and Antigone, Sophocles’ audience would have recognized a genuine conflict of duties and values. In their ethical philosophy, the ancient Athenians clearly recognized that conflicts can arise between two separate but valid principles, and that such situations call for practical judgment and deliberation. From the Greek point of view, both Creon’s and Antigone’s positions are flawed, because both oversimplify ethical life by recognizing only one kind of “good” or duty. By oversimplifying, each ignores the fact that a conflict exists at all, or that deliberation is necessary. Moreover, both Creon and Antigone display the dangerous flaw of pride in the way they justify and carry out their decisions. Antigone admits right from the beginning that she wants to carry out the burial because the action is “glorious.” Creon’s pride is that of a tyrant. He is inflexible and unyielding, unwilling throughout the play to listen to advice. The danger of pride is that it leads both these characters to overlook their own human finitude—the limitations of their own powers.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An account of the Athenian Mitylenian Debate from Thuycidides’s History of the Peloponessian War illustrates how the democratic process impedes decision-making in…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Machiavelli and Odysseus

    • 4351 Words
    • 18 Pages

    This text contains a thorough history of ancient Greek political thought. It examines different kinds of ancient text (e.g. The Odyssey) in order to clearly demonstrate the political thought and structure of ancient Greece during its time. It also studies the connection between politics and ethics in ancient Greece. Part of this text studies the tendencies of the noblemen to revolt against a ruler. Balot stated that the aristocrats often sought for political connection outside a king’s monarchy to gain additional political connection that could possibly help them attack their own government. It also contains Balot’s view of the situation in Ithaca when Odysseus power is inexistent. Balot stated that Odysseus existence as a king is the only thing that hinders the “less-restrained” aristocrats from doing what they wish to do in his land.…

    • 4351 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Socrates Failure

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The virtue in individuals does not always bring prosperity to the state on the whole. Not everyone is sensitive to the good of the others. Socrates' republic is, in this sense, utopic. Socrates states, "Anyone who intends to practise his craft well never does or orders but his best for himself " (Plato, 23). This belief does not match the modern experience nor does it match the experience of a Greek citizen in Ancient Greece. In reverse, Thrasymachus believes that justice is a means for the strong to exercise advantage. In a sense Thrasymachus associates the strenght of a citizen with his authority and position in the society. He famously states, "Justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger" (Plato, 14). Justice is a tool for the established order to preserve itself. The strong citizen with a sizeable authority makes use of justice in a manner to assert his private interests. Under the shadow of justice, he can easily practise injustice and impose it as justice to the others. Thats why the strong is in a position to employ justice and injustice at their own interest. For instance, since a ruler makes laws in a position to twist justice for his own benefit. Therefore, his prior concern is to preserve and enhance his own authority. In order to do that, he ignores the welfare of his subjects. He does not act always within a moral…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Worldviews in Conflict

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Boston, R. (1993). Why so many church-state problems? Why the religious right is wrong about separation of church and state (2 ed., pp. 25-26). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Peloponnesian War

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the early onset of the war and through his descriptions, Athens is portrayed as a beautiful and prosperous city which Thucydides profoundly expresses his love for. This becomes an integral theme of his book, and an important one. Even his exile from Athens following the defeat at Amphipolis did not singe his Athenian roots. This raises an important question: Can Thucydides’ work be considered unbiased? The issue of subjectivity and objectivity for researchers is a heavily debated topic. In her article “The Enigma of Subjectivity”, Professor Donna Ladkin of Cranfield University explores this topic, investigating “the role objectivity plays in establishing valid claims to truth”. She concludes her analysis saying that “subjectivity and objectivity are necessarily intertwined in the creation of valid truths”. It is Thucydides’ first-hand experience in the Peloponnesian War that enables this truth to come out, while at the same time being supported by a varying degree of accounts. While in exile, for some 20 years, Thucydides encountered both Athenians and Spartans with whom he recollected and shared accounts of the Peloponnesian War. This provided for unique perspectives in his work, enabling that third-party observer…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay discusses and clarifies a concept that is central to Plato's argument in the Republic — an argument in favour of the transcendent value of justice as a human good; that justice informs and guides moral conduct. Plato's argument implies that justice and morality are intimately interconnected, because the excellence and goodness of human life — the best way for a person to live — is intimately dependent upon and closely interwoven with those 'things that we find desirable in themselves and for their consequences [1]. Hence, we acknowledge that Plato Is moral thesis cannot be interpreted either as a deontological or as a consequentialist argument — or as an act centred or agent centred moral concept. Plato's thesis is informative, in philosophical terms, precisely because it enables us to find new and more fruitful ways of looking at those basic questions concerning justice and morality, and the manner in which they are interrelated [2].…

    • 3158 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Is Not Guilty

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the book, Plato Republic, Socrates had a discussion with Thrasymachus and Glaucon about justice and unjustice. In this essay, I shall argue that Plato’s solution of the temptation of the ring is successful in a few ways. I will describe Thrasymachus and Glaucon’s idea about justice, and how Socrates discuss with them in terms of the justice of the city, justice of individual soul, his theory of forms and the importance of the knowledge of the good, and the sun analogy and the allegory of the cave.…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment the main protagonist, Rodion Roskolnikov, is driven by a passionate admiration for “great men”; men who had power. This passionate admiration manifests itself into an illusion for Roskolnikov; an illusion that is created and perpetuated by constant reaffirmation of his intelligence by his loved ones and peers. In perusal of aligning himself to his hero, Napoleon Bonaparte, Roskolnikov spends his time patronizing the human race and glorifying his own existence. It is because of his struggle to be a hero and his embedded feelings of self-righteousness that he chooses to murder the pawn broker Alyona Ivanova. After the murder of Alyona (and by default her sister, Lizaveta) Roskolnikov is unable to cope with the guilt of the murders and is unable to cope with the burdens that he has created for his friends, family, and girlfriend.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    as readers, come closer to a definition of justice.Three definitions of justice are presented: argued…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays