Preview

Moral Absolutism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1491 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral Absolutism
Moral Absolutism a) Explain what is meant by Moral Absolutism. (25)
Moral absolutism is an ethical theory which believes that there are absolute standards against which moral questions can be judged, and that certain actions are either right or wrong. Moral absolutists might, for example, judge slavery, war, dictatorship, the death penalty, or child abuse to be absolutely immoral regardless of the situations or beliefs of a culture that engages in these practices. Moral absolutism adopts the theory that certain actions are moral or immoral regardless of the circumstances in which they occur.
Absolutists consider that the Ten Commandments, found in the book of Exodus, are rules which should never be broken - no matter what. For example, one of the commandments found in Exodus 20:13 is "You shall not kill" and absolutists believe that this rule should never be broken. They would not even agree with the murder of one person, such as a terrorist, in order to save an entire nation. Another example is lying, certain absolutists feel that they should never lie no matter what the consequences are, even if it was in order to save an innocent persons life or to promote some sort of good.
Plato was the first philosopher to raise an example of moral absolutism in western society; the Theory of the Forms. Plato stated that the forms are concepts that are eternally constant, and provide meaning and structure to the universe. Contrary to the natural state of change that the world is in, the forms are unchangeable. According to Plato, all of the forms came to be a single, and unalterable, idea. This made the “Form of the Good.” Therefore, for example; beauty is the Form of the Good in aesthetics, justice is the Form of the Good in politics and virtue is the Form of the Good in ethics. But what is the “Good”? Plato believed that the “Good” was the one thing that all humans should aim to find and pay attention to.
Moral absolutism may be clearer to explain in terms of moral

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is the acceptance of, or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. French absolutism started with Louis XIV and Russian absolutism started with Peter the Great. Louis XIV ruled from 1643-1714 and Peter the Great ruled from 1699-1725. In French absolutism, the rule of absolute monarchs was not all embracing because they lacked the financial and military resources, and the technology to make it so. France and Russia are alike in absolutism that they both sought to control religion and that they got the rich out of paying taxes. They are different in that Louis XIV wasn’t successful in wars, but Peter the Great was.…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ 10 21 14

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another important aspect of absolutism is religion and keeping the religious happy. The religious followers never like too much change and being an absolutist means you have full control over the church. In Document F, Bishop Jacques Bossuet is speaking about a king’s relation to the church; he states, “There is something religious in the…

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    8. ABSOLUTISM: A political theory that absolute power should be vested in one or more rulers.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is the principle or exercise of complete or unrestricted power in government. It refers to any political role player that has complete control. This means that they were under the control of a single leader. 1 We see this in the European states in the 17th century, where states were ruled by absolute monarchs. This meant the king ruled with absolute power, with no restrictions or resistance shown against him. This royal authority has been passed down from generation to generation. People believed that kings given a Devine Right to rule by God. 2 Therefore no one even thought of disobeying the king because they were afraid of God. Europe was an unequal society at this time regarding politics, distribution of wealth and social wellness of people. The states primarily concern was collecting taxes from the people, most of which was used to finance the wars.3 Kings did not usually feel a great sense of obligation or liability to the people under his control, because they…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism has been present in Europe since the 14th century. Absolutism is led by a King who believes in divine right. A divine right leader believes that God sent him to be King. An absolute monarch believes that people should just follow them, since they were sent by God. If someone were to disobey the King, they would actually be disobeying God, not the King. The only person that can make decisions in an absolute monarch is the King because if anyone else makes the decision it is not coming from God. The people in an absolute monarch are supposed to follow the king, work, and pay taxes. Absolutism was harmful for Europe socially because of religion conflicts, politically since the citizens do not have any rights, and economically…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Enlightened absolutism was not a contemporary term to the European rulers it now describes. Consequently, interpretations of enlightened absolutists vary and are dependent on the time of analysis. The term was developed in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and since then its interpretation has evolved. The idea of enlightened absolutism, however, was observed and the principles were familiar in the second half of the eighteenth century among certain rulers. At first, the term was only applied to German speaking lands, but has since expanded geographically and to include French and Italian Enlightenment philosophy as well as German cameralism in its influences. The perceived benefits and faults of this style of ruling have transformed…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Relativism is what determines whether the action or conduct is right or wrong. This article states how from a moral absolutist standpoint, some things are always right, while some things are always wrong no matter how much one tries to rationalize them. At the same time, this article defines moral relativism as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. What this means is that what you think is morally right, may not be morally right for someone else. Basically relativism replaces the search for absolute truth. Moral relativism and moral absolutism are means of deriving the morality of the character from The Road. They are tools to use to judge the characters actions, if they can be considered morally correct or morally unethical.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism is the view of thinking that there is a single standard in terms of assessments that can be made, and that standard is usually their own. In a clash of cultures, they often see the other culture as simply wrong insofar as it deviates from their own. Relativism sees each culture as correct in its own world and they deny any exhaustive standard in terms of which conflicting cultures can be judged. Philosophical flaws involved with two notions in relation to the concept of tolerance can be illustrated by the example of female genital mutilation practiced in Saudi Arabia. One must be a relativist in order to have a high tolerance for this. In other words, a relativist would say that each culture is right unto itself so forced clitoridectomies can be morally permissible in those countries but what if a Saudi Arabian family living in America is practicing such thing in a clandestine way? Is it right to accept such an act as a relativist? If accepting the absolutist idea (in this case Saudi Arabian genital mutilation would be the absolutist idea) is considered tolerant, is it morally right to be tolerant? Absolutists would maintain that such practices are illegal in America and they should be banned everywhere. That makes them intolerant in theory but it is certain that a majority of people from non-Arabic countries would be against the practice of clitoridectomies, and this makes us intolerant. Should we be labeled intolerant when it comes to being against this kind of practice? Should relativism be deemed better than absolutism? It is hard to say so.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy Hamlet Exam

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato’s moral theory consisted of the concept of the soul and the concept of virtue as function. To Plato, the soul has three parts; reason, spirit, and appetite. The reason we do things is to reach a goal or value, our spirit drives us to accomplish our goal, and our desire for things is our appetite. The three virtues that must be fulfilled to reach the fourth, general virtue are temperance, courage, and wisdom, which correlate with the three parts of the soul. In order to achieve inner harmony, every part of the soul must be fulfilling its proper function.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism - 2

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Europe’s nobility saw absolutism as a complete loss of political power and influence. Absolutism was the governmental principle that the reigning monarch has a great, divine power, which is hindered by no one else within the country they rule. The 17th and 18th centuries was period in which nobles once held power and influence over government was diminished to the precipice of oblivion. King Louis XIV in France, the Hohenzollerns of Prussia, and Peter the Great of Russia all sought complete control of their territories. Although their economic statuses remained, the power of the European nobles had weakened.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Plato’s theory of forms he implies that there is one good thing that all good things have in common. This theory does not hold to be true when what everyone considers to be good is different. The diversity in all things humans consider to be good could not have one single unifying form of good. So interest switch from the good to how can someone be good? How can some one achieve being good?…

    • 2394 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism posited that government should have complete power over its citizens. James I of England compared an absolutist monarch’s power over his kingdom to that of God’s over earth: “God hath power to create or destroy, make or unmake at His pleasure, to give life or sent death, to judge all and to be judged nor accountable to none, to raise…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead absolutism neglects different circumstances along with cultural attitudes, cannot have a clear idea of its morals as no one can state them or knows them, also it is not concerned with the motive or outcome of any actions. However, it does provide a universal vision to measure everything against, creating fairness as everyone would get the same punishment or reward, providing us with a UN Declaration of Human Rights, also in certain circumstances people instinctively have an absolutist attitude; for example cruelty to babies is wrong. On the other hand relativist judgments are always subjective, decreasing the fairness as people might have different losses or benefits because of their actions, people will also disagree on each other’s judgments. This view also stops social development; an example of this would be genocide which should be considered wrong but from a relativist vision it would be analysed depending on circumstances and goals, the holocaust would be an example of this. It is also more complicated to apply than absolutism as there would not be a fixed…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato wrote The Republic to elaborate on what justice is in society. He divided it into different books to explain the different aspects of justice. Everyone has their own view of what justice is but Plato thoroughly explains how society views justice as a whole, defines what justice is, and who and what the just man is. In book six and seven Plato explains what the good is and gives three analogies: the sun, the line and the cave. Plato declines the two ideas that good is knowledge or pleasure. Plato cannot exactly define what the good is, which is why he uses these analogies to help explain where goodness comes from, and what it truly is. The analogies of the sun, the line, and the cave will be thoroughly explained along with my insight…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An absolutist Christian would have the idea that abortion will always be wrong as it is seen as murder and the bible teaches “thou shalt not murder”. Therefore an absolutist Christian would claim that there should be no issue surrounding abortion as with it being a sin people should not do it and will be morally wrong if they do. I do not feel this is a good way to deal with the problems of abortion as it does not allow women the chance to take an abortion even if it would be the best option for herself or the baby. Such as if the baby had a disability that would cause them immense pain and suffering or cause them to die soon after birth which I believe is wrong.…

    • 503 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays