Preview

Montesquieu Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1002 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Montesquieu Research Paper
From the eyes of a man, society is a flavorless image, however, from the eyes of a philosopher, he or she sees the flaws, beauty, brilliance, and prosperity in our society. As for Montesquieu, a French lawyer, philosopher, writer and government official, it was no different, stating “Society is the union of men and not the men themselves.” Throughout Montesquieu’s time as a philosopher, he saw society filled with issues and flaws that were needed to be addressed immediately, for the sake of the people, their nation, and society. As a result, Montesquieu had embarked on a journey of voicing his beliefs and ideology in regards to the various fields he had studied such as politics and economics. And surprisingly enough, Montesquieu had influenced …show more content…
For that reason, Montesquieu was able to obtain an elite education at Oratorian College de Juilly to pursue a study in literature, sciences, and classical education. Afterwards, Montesquieu had attended the University of Bordeaux to study law after his success at Oratorian College de Juilly; unfortunately, due to the tragic loss of his father after his studies at the University of Bordeaux, Montesquieu then decided to return to his father’s deathbed in honor of his death. In contrast, along this point in time, Montesquieu was appointed to become a counselor to the Bordeaux parliament; and from this point forward, Montesquieu’s luck had begun to take a change for the better cause. In 1715, Montesquieu had married a woman by the name of Jeanne de Lartigue who had possessed a large dowry, and in 1716, his uncle had passed away; thus, awarding Montesquieu an innumerable amount of properties and the title as the “Baron de La Brede and de Montesquieu.” Afterward, with his new properties, wealth, and position, Montesquieu was then promoted to Deputy President of the Bordeaux Parliament; thus, gifting Montesquieu plenty of time to pursue his own interest such as roman law, social science, biology, geography, and physics. With that said, the brilliance of Montesquieu had begun to …show more content…
Moving onto a different subject, throughout the works of Montesquieu, he had intended for his works to convey his message or beliefs to the public, so they as well will know what is truly happening in the world they live in. For instance, with the publication of the “Persian Letters,” Montesquieu had conveyed his beliefs of how the government should be run and the idea that the government should have a separation of powers (legislative, judicial, and executive) run by a system of checks and balances; interestingly enough, these very ideas of Montesquieu had influenced our Founding Father when creating our U.S. Constitution, and a system of government we see every day. Moving onto a different point, Montesquieu had also held the notion that the system of government depends on the conditions of the country; to clarify, he believed that a country should either be a Republic, Monarchy, or Despotic depending on the conditions such as their population density, climate, and wealth. For example, Montesquieu had stated that a Republican government would be ideal for a country with a small population density, where the climate is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau, J.-J., Wootton, D. and Cress, D. (2012) Basic Political Writings: Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Discourse on Political Economy, on the Social Contract, the State of War. 2nd edn. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ana Belen Montes was born in 1957 on a United States military base in West Germany. Her parents both had strong Puerto Rican roots, however, English was their first language at home. After leaving the military base, Montes along with her three siblings and parents, settled for a short time in Topeka, Kansas before moving to Towson, Maryland where Ana Belen Montes received a supreme public education. Ana’s family became wealthy after her father took a job in a private psychoanalyst practice. Even though wealthy, Monte’s father was a disciplinarian. Ana and her father did not enjoy each other’s company and brutal conflicts often arouse from their disagreements. Ana Belen Montes’ father was abusive; however, Ana was able to escape his abuse by going off to college at the University of Virginia.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Baron de Montesquieu also touches on the definition of a democracy, drawing inspiration form the Roman structure, “the body of people is possessed of the supreme power.” In The Spirt of Laws he also touches on the fact that similarities to Roman punishments enlighten other governments similarities to that of Rome. John Locke also touches on this separation of powers labeling then differently in The Two Treaties of Civil Government labeling then as legislative, executive, and federative…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analyze and critique the role that counter-intuitive insights play in de Tocqueville's argument concerning the roots and nature of the French Revolution.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jewelry is not only considered a status symbol, but a reflection of someone’s taste. A woman’s craze for jewelry is a universally known fact. Women look more beautiful, confident, and graceful when wearing jewelry. In most cases, it enhances the beauty of an outfit and overall personality. Whether it’s a toned down, simplistic style, or an extravagant and vibrant look, jewelry can be a woman’s way of expressing herself without saying a word.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The "Persian Letters" (Letters XI - XIV) illustrate a classic question in philosophical thought: is man meant to live life by desire or virtue, and what happens if either case is taken to an extreme. Montesquieu illustrates this in letters written by Usbek to Mirza, and a story of a clan of Troglodytes who have created a city (so to speak) first ruled by their own desires as individuals (or their own selfish desires) and then through time, come to live by virtue, and later an attempt at the formation of a government - where the story ends.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Without philosophers and brilliant minds, countries wouldn't be as productive or successful as they are today. It's people like Alexis de Tocqueville who were men of many special talents who have shaped countries to where they are today. His research and dedication alone are the foundations that we still use today. Tocqueville’s numerous works on religion, politics, crime and punishment, democracy and parties, and tyranny have helped cultivate the United States and are considered to be master pieces to the human race. This great philosopher dedicated his life and work to educate others and spread his knowledge and wisdom. Tocqueville has become one of the greatest minds who has ever lived based on his understanding on democracy and his philosophies. His…

    • 2579 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rousseau’s quotation, “Man is born free yet, everywhere he is in chains” implies that a person is gifted with great possibilities and potential. Unfortunately, the society surrounding that person is responsible for crushing that individual’s essence. Those who refuse to conform to such a society are judged negatively and consequently, feel alienated. Both Keating and Meursault are strangers in a society that wants to dictate their expected behaviour and actions. Society seeks to imprison their individual freedom. Meursault is indifferent and passive to this conventional life that is not worth living. He refuses to be anything but himself, regardless of the price he must pay. In contrast, Keating responds to such a society by actively and passionately trying to make a difference by nurturing each person to be free to reach his or her potential and essence. Society seeks to chain these two free individuals into conforming to ways that stifle their individuality and freedom, but the key lies in their choice of response in dealing with such a society, regardless of its negative judgement.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He enumerates several conditions by which the government could be remedied including the following: the decentralization of government; the decentralization of the administration; the creation of non-political associations; and the imposition of religion. Only then “a legislative power could be so constituted as to represent the majority without necessarily being the slave of its passions, an executive so as to retain a proper share of authority, and a judiciary so as to remain independent of the other two powers, a government would be formed which would still be democratic while incurring scarcely any risk of tyranny” Unlike Rousseau, Tocqueville has the advantage of having working with more than just a theoretical model of a society and, as such, his understanding of how realistically the majority rule could function differs significantly. He perceives the majority rule of the legislature less as a route for achieving the common good, but rather as a threat of tyranny both political and social; furthermore, and the solutions he offers to this condition are not only far more complex but would require an entire social…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke, Montesquieu, Rousseau, and Voltaire influenced the Declaration of Independence and Constitution in many ways; they were also Enlightenment thinkers. First, Montesquieu believed in the separation of powers to avoid tyranny and promote liberty and justice, which was expressed in the Declaration of Independence. The theories he had made were very influential in the making of the Constitution. He wrote a system of check and balances that a government should incorporate so that one branch cannot overrule another. The branches he wrote of are the judicial, executive, and legislative, which to this day, the US still currently employs. His idea about a need for a “separation of powers” was highly critical too.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Radical middle-class extremists became the revolutionary leaders who used the financial anguish and social misery of the poor as the torch to drive their need for change and to push their disguised political agenda to seize power and to obliterate the aristocracy. The situation of the poor did not improve much or none at all, if did not turn much worse living in constant fear and uncertainty. Luckily in the end, common sense and reason brought back some peace, calm, and somewhat reestablished social stability, although the country had been changed forever. The price paid to “better” society, just as Voltaire deemed necessary, was certainly a bloody one. The means used to attain them were not much different from the brutality, unfairness, oppression, and repression he despised and so relentlessly denounced.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Building a New Nation

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When deciding how to build a government Montesquieu and Hume had ideas on how they thought the government should work. Montesquieu believed that a republic cannot exist well in large territories, you get to far removed and the political leaders end up getting to do whatever they want. Hume believed that a republic cannot exist in a small territory because the people will get caught up in the little problems and will lose sight of the big picture. He said that as long as we elect good leaders for the best outcome, it can work in a large society.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A flawed fixed social structure and fiscal mismanagement are some of the plethora of issues that demonstrated the disdain for the rights of man in pre-revolutionary times. During this time, unequal distribution of wealth, status, and land lead to the economic downfall of France. To put a stop to the financial ruin, leaders knew they needed to make a radical change to their taxation system. Because the first and second estate benefited from tax exemption, the third estate felt the need to fight for their individual freedom and social equality, bringing about the revolution, it’s main goal being the pursuit of the rights of man.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Social Contract, Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s key viewpoint is that all men are born free, but end up being in chains everywhere in the course of their lives (Rousseau and Cole 2 ). Rousseau argues that modern political states repress the basic freedoms which men possess as their birthright. These political states then lead men into the civil society in which the civil freedoms of men are not secure. Most importantly, Rousseau points out that the legitimacy of political authority can only be a product of social that all citizens agree upon motivated by the need for mutual preservation. Throughout the book, Rousseau makes key distinctions that make the basis of the discussions in this essay.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since he was born, Tocqueville had been exposed to politics and government. His father was the mayor of Verneuil, which was where much of Tocqueville's childhood was spent. As he grew up he took courses in law, which eventually aided him in writing Democracy in America. While on official business to view the American penal system, Tocqueville got his first taste of democracy. When the twenty eight year old de Tocqueville returned to France he began writing Democracy in America. While composing it, Tocqueville has a specific audience and purpose in mind. In the 1830's the government in France was very unstable. Tocqueville's intentions for his book, Democracy in America, were to convince the French aristocracy that a democracy would be a superior form of government to a monarchy for the people of France. If this idea was exposed to and accepted by the aristocracy then it would eventually be accepted by the lower classes, and hopefully bring about permanent reform.…

    • 977 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays