Preview

Modern States

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2595 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Modern States
The State in the Modern Day Context

The state can be seen as a concept which has emerged over thousands of years in order to sustain the needs of societies growing in size and complexity. This growth in size and complexity was coupled with the growing need for authority and order, due to special mechanisms being needed for society to benefit from its increased social power and productive capacity (Petho, 2010:6). State formation passes through stages of development and hinges upon ecological, demographic, economic and political factors (Petho, 2010:2). As a result of this, not all states developed in the same way. States which developed prior to 1945 and post-1945 experienced very different state formation as well as a changed economic environment (Spruyt, 2007:223;25). This literature review will aim to analyse the literature covering the way in which the modern state is defined as well as the two theories which discuss how it came to prominence as we know it today, additionally reference will be made to how the modern state differs from the post-colonial state in Africa.
The modern state is a concept which does not hold a universally accepted definition largely due to the inability of all scholars to agree upon a brief generally acceptable definition, as asserted by Pierson (2004); he raises the notion that even the concept of the state itself remains unresolved as the questions which surround the state cannot be answered with absolute certainty (Pierson, 2004:1). Although, the most famous definition is provided by Max Weber and it defines the state as a “political institutional organisation” whose “administrative staff can successfully exercise a monopoly of legitimate physical force in the execution of its orders” (Anter, 2014:11). However, across the reviewed literature there are a set of common characteristics which are prevalent as the requirements a state needs to meet in order to be considered a modern state. These criterion are much influenced by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To be a state; a government must establish orders, be in control, have a court system, and have a population. I think that the purpose of this article is to inform readers about what it takes to form a state. Fukuyama’s argument is that all tribes will become a state by first possessing a source of authority. Being a state would prevent separation of regions from falling apart or being against each other. States would not hold boundaries based on who's blood is who’s. It would create unity. He also argues that in a social contract, in a time of violence, being a state is the greatest idea because of guaranteed security. Among the tribal societies, they are only secured with limited protection and as for a state there would be unlimited protection because of the rights they give up. I think that Fukuyama is trying to say that when the government is under invasion there would be support and protection at all times. Fukuyama informs the readers by introducing how important having a large population would benefit a state and technological innovations argued by a demographer, Ester Boserup. Having a denser population is a product of growth. Fukuyama shows the idea of human societies engaging with violence and comparing tribal societies it is obviously safer than having to give up tribal equalities for protection. I agree how the author believes that this is why states eventually began to form. It is obvious that there must be resources used to the maximum potential and a population that is willing to be governed for comprehension is order to run a more perfect and satisfied union. It is also obvious that tribes should be willing to move and prosper among a more better climate zones to expand and grow more…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ipa Cheat Sheet

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages

    AIPA 2: UNDERSTANDING ACTORS, INTERESTS & POWER Institutions  Basic level – states exist to provide (1) defence and (2) social order  this requires the presence of a functioning economy.  State not only produces, consumes and redistributes; it’s also the main source and enforcer of “rules of games”.  “Rules of games” are institutions  institutional quality is related to economic performance.  Evidence: No country has gotten rich with bad institutions. Politics  Politics is the process of creating new institutions. Existing institutions create a constraint on this process.  Political processes can be analysed in terms of Actors involved in the processes, their interests and their relative power (AIP).  Actors: Political, Societal(land, labour, capital, business associations, unions, students, military), International (hegemon, institutions)  Interests: Assume, Deduce or Judge by stated intention and observed behaviour.  Power: voter base, past performance, military control, resource control, shared nationalism/ethnicity, moral authority, int’l support  Usually, the actor with greatest relative power wins. IPA 3: STATE STRUCTURES 1: ENDS, DECISION-MAKING & IMPLEMENTATION Ends = the ultimate end of economic policy, not necessarily what is said.  Self-enrichment - “rentier state” e.g. Zaire, Congo. Anything possible for highest bidder.  Economic Development - “developmental state” e.g. Japan, S. Korea. Risk-sharing and high intervention with bias to domestic firms.  Equal outcomes - “welfare state” e.g. Scandinavia, Netherlands. Minor state intervention, heavily regulated, little adjustments & intervention.  Equal opportunity - “regulatory state” e.g. US, Hong Kong. Minor state intervention, light regulations & adjustments Decision-Making…

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments and assumptions made by the author Throughout his excerpt, Rotberg has made a prominent claim about states and their standings. His main argument constitutes around whether a state is defined as weak, strong, or failing. What he wants the readers to understand is that in order for a Nation state to be classified as a Nation, they need to be able to provide the main component of a state, political goods. Rotberg stresses that not only do states need political goods, but also they need to have security in order to run properly and efficiently.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Samuels discusses the problems seen in late formed states in his article “The State”. He notes the importance of natural resources, peaceful government transition and the presence of violence in the initial years. Samuels discusses the advantage of Botswana’s diamond trade in his work. He introduces this advantage as a possible solution to Botswana’s economic prosperity but admits that “in…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “State Capitalism, the visible hand” “Adrian Wooldridge” claims that, because of the beginning of a new form of strong state capitalism the catastrophe of the western liberal capitalism begins. State capitalism tries to meld the powers of the state with the powers of capitalism. It depends on government to pick winners and promote economic growth. The focus is on the rising trend of State capitalism in various economies across the globe. It provides views on the success and potential for continuation of this form of government intervention in mixed economies worldwide. The rise of state capitalism spells the end of free markets and ‘the invisible hand’ by Adam Smith's.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    WORLD WARS PAPER

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: [1] Biersteker, T. J. and C. Weber, Eds. (1996). State Sovereignty as Social Construct. New York: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘The state (as defined by Max Weber) is an organisation that successfully claims a monopoly of the legitimate use of force in a given territory.’- the state‘s authority may be backed by violence if necessary. ‘Territory is clearly central to Webers definition - the state claims to be dominant within a defined territory or within a country’s borders.’…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term state is interpreted as having many different meanings, all of which refer to the same concept. Max Weber defines a state as, “the organization that maintains a monopoly of violence over a territory” (O’Neil 28). That statement being somewhat confusing, many would just define a state as centralized power and authority. We have states because they are a set of institutions which carry out many things in order to establish order and policies within territories. It would not be possible to live without states because the protection, order, and security provided by states are needed. If people tried to live without them there would be mass chaos and disorder and very little or no protection from inside and outside threats. If states were to disappear in the future, new strains of technology may replace them. With the way technology is evolving and changing it is possible that the same tasks being performed by states today can be performed futuristically by newer technology, and possibly in a more convenient way. Regimes are also an important component to the larger framework of a state. The most important components that make up the regime of the United States are democracy and the government being that those foundations have a major role in establishing rules regarding collective equality and individual freedom. The formal written elements are things such as the constitution, state laws, taxes, and different policies that everyone must abide by. The informal and unwritten elements are things such as rules and regulations that may not necessarily be written, but everyone abides by the anyway because it is a part of the regime.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1648 the Peace of Westphalia effectively ended the rule of the Roman Catholic Church replacing it with a system of legal entities with a permanent population, a well-defined territory and governments capable of exercising sovereignty. The modern sovereign state with a supreme authority to manage internal and external affairs was born. For most of its existence the discipline of International Relations was normally presumed to treat the relations between states, the latter viewed as cohesive social actors driven by their desire for power and prestige. International organizations and other non-state actors were allowed an influence of their own in certain areas, but the state remained in ultimate control. Now IR scholars argue that there has been a transition in the system of sovereignty from the free reign power of the states over their political and economic rule, to a more liberal system that seeks to limit the states authority. There is a perception that IGO's and NGO's are replacing states as the dominant actors in the international system.` Idealists often present non-state actors as the vanguard of an emerging global civil society, challenging the instinctive authoritarianism of states and the power of international capital. Hard-line realists see them either as front organizations thinly disguising the interests of particular states, or as potential revolutionaries, seeking to undermine national solidarity and stability of the state system ` (Josselin and Wallace, 2001). None of the theories can now deny that the balance of power between states and non-state actors has shifted. The purpose of this essay is to examine whether this shift has declined the authority of the states or left them as the most important actors in world politics? By comparing the state to other actors in IR the essay hopes to answer this question.…

    • 2584 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To represent the people of a particular nation for the sake of the common good. The state and its authority is necessary, but must be within the limits of moral order. Citizens have every right to protect themselves against the abuse of authority, but they in turn also have a role to use their vote to what they believe is the common good.…

    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Does Power Matter

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    International politics is driven by an endless struggle for power which has its roots in human nature (Classical), or anarchical system (Structural). It describes the sovereignty as a distinguished trait and is similar with the use of force. Also, if security is absent in a territory, a community is not possible. For Max Weber, “the state has the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory”. On the other hand, the reason and the possibility of progress serve as the foundation of the liberal worldview.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sst 1 Task 1 Wgu

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the characteristics of a modern nation-state, the European Union, and a couple of the foreign policies of the United States. By the end of this paper there should be an understanding of what makes a modern nation-state and also some examples of countries that are either a nation or state.…

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Susan Strange published a book titled: The Retreat of the State. In her book, Strange took on a comprehensive concept about the dynamics of both power and politics, arguing that there is a declining authority of states. While Strange’s argument explores some of the causes that lie behind the decline of the state, Robert Gilpin counter-argues in his book, Global Political Economy, that today, more than ever before, the policies of the states are needed to maintain the affairs of the powerful economic and technological forces. Focusing on these arguments, this paper explores the concept of power and politics, arguing that the powerful economic and technological forces brought by globalization, and the rise of non-state authorities has not limited…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theory of Origin of State

    • 5539 Words
    • 23 Pages

    For the first 2 million years of his existence, man lived in bands or vil-lages which, as far as we can tell, were completely autonomous. Not until perhaps 5000 B.C. did villages begin to aggregate into larger political units. But, once this process of aggregation began, it continued at a progressively faster pace and led, around 4000 B.C., to the formation of the first state in history. (When I speak of a state I mean an autonomous political unit, encompassing many communities with-in its territory and having a centralized government with the power to collect taxes, draft men for work or war, and decree and enforce laws.) Although it was by all odds the most far-reaching political development in human history, the origin of the state is still very imperfectly understood. In-deed, not one of the current theories of the rise of the state is entirely satis-factory. At one point or another, all of them fail. There is one theory, though, which I believe does provide a con-vincing explanation of how states began. It is a theory which I proposed once before (1), and which I present here more fully. Before doing so, however it seems desirable to discuss, if only briefly, a few of the traditional theories. Explicit theories of the origin of the state are relatively modern. Classical writers like Aristotle, unfamiliar with other forms of political organization, tended to think of the state as "nat-ural," and therefore as not requiring an explanation. However, the age of exploration, by making Europeans aware that many peoples throughout the world lived, not in states, but in independent villages or tribes, made the state seem less natural, and thus more in need of explanation. Of the many modern theories of state origins that have been proposed, we can consider only a few. Those with a racial basis, for example,…

    • 5539 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Modern State

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1.What does the modern state do? What are the salient features of the modern state?…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays