Modern day GPS/tracking devices
Since the new modern GPS tracking systems appeared, parents have been chipping their children invading their Childs privacy. It affects the children’s life and ruins the fact that they have freedom and privacy. Paranoid moms and dads have been chipping and GPS tracking their children since the day these devices came out to monitor their every move. Although the parents are trying to keep their children safe, it’s not fair that the children, mainly teens, can’t have any freedom. Everywhere they go they are being watched by their parents and not getting any privacy. A small chip, the size of the end of your pinky, is the main tracking devices parents use in their children’s neck. The discrimination and privacy invasion of the children with GPS tracking is taking their freedom and being able to have teen privileges. GPS/tracking devices are getting out of control since they came out and it’s causing a huge invasion of privacy.
Although GPS tracking devices save lives, it puts a huge impact on our privacy and effects our way of living. While there are benefits of the technology do not in terms of public security, for instance, these benefits do not necessarily need to come at the expense of privacy and liberty overall. The PhD dissertation argues that the US and UK legal frame works, are in adequate to defend privacy and other civil liberties against body scanners, CCTV microphones, human implantable chips, and etc. The interest of privacy, liberty and security can be balanced and safeguarded concurrently. Not only tracking devices but recorders and surveillance is also a big issue in privacy and is really getting out of hand. In airports, surveillance cameras are installed in bathrooms to keep sake of a bomb threat, but isn’t really necessary in this case of invasion of privacy. In addition to the GPS tracking, there is also recording installed in phones and the tracking device itself. Not only is it unnecessary but it’s a big part of privacy that lets
Although GPS tracking devices save lives, it puts a huge impact on our privacy and effects our way of living. While there are benefits of the technology do not in terms of public security, for instance, these benefits do not necessarily need to come at the expense of privacy and liberty overall. The PhD dissertation argues that the US and UK legal frame works, are in adequate to defend privacy and other civil liberties against body scanners, CCTV microphones, human implantable chips, and etc. The interest of privacy, liberty and security can be balanced and safeguarded concurrently. Not only tracking devices but recorders and surveillance is also a big issue in privacy and is really getting out of hand. In airports, surveillance cameras are installed in bathrooms to keep sake of a bomb threat, but isn’t really necessary in this case of invasion of privacy. In addition to the GPS tracking, there is also recording installed in phones and the tracking device itself. Not only is it unnecessary but it’s a big part of privacy that lets