Preview

Model Of Indeterminate Sentencing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
939 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Model Of Indeterminate Sentencing
Sentencing Paper
CJA/234
02/12/2014
Instructor: Mr. Mitchell

Punishment may sound like painful word, but in fact it is nothing more but a consequence given to a criminal offender. The state and federal correction system have similar objectives for criminal offenders as a form of punishment. Due to request for harsher punishment, sentencing affects both the state and federal correction system. Upon pleading or finding an offender guilty, the determinate and indeterminate sentencing model is implied in which the federal and state correctional system assigns to criminals for time given in prison. Depending on the crime, punishment for both state and federal prison system
…show more content…
An indeterminate sentence is decided by the sentencing judge, and is later reviewed by a release authority to determine the actual time that will be served. Indeterminate sentences are given at the time of the sentencing and are given a minimum to a maximum time to be served by the criminal. After the minimum term has been served, the offender is provided with the opportunity to be released, by being placed on the parole board. The parole board then determines the release date, time frame is between the minimum and maximum term sentence. If the parole board does not issue parole for the offender, he or she is to serve the maximum sentence. Upon completion of the sentence served, the offender is to be released. Determinate sentences are sentences that are fixed term to be serve. The offenders are eligible for release soon after completion of the time that was originally given. Unlike the indeterminate sentencing, offenders who are under the determinate sentences, t are not reviewed by any parole board and are to be released upon completion of his or her time served. The sentence that should be considered more normally is the indeterminate sentencing. The fact that the indeterminate sentencing has a parole board, should allow personnel to evaluate the individual and really determine if the criminal is eligible for release. The parole board should have all records of behavior and should have a minimum requirement of training completion, in rehabilitation. Training must be successful courses completed, showing the individual 's behavior improvement. If the offender does not have any, he or she may be considered to be released until the requirements are met. He or she may be given an option in six months for another review, in order to proceed to the parole board for release. (Seiter, R.P

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The general factors that influence a judge's sentencing decisions are statutory provisions, philosophical rationales, organizational considerations, presentence investigation reports. Judge are free to tailor fit a punishment for a sentence within its limit. A judge can order the offender to pay restitution to the victim, survivors, or a community for injury inflicted. The offender can attain credits from jail time while waiting for trial and deduct it from their prison sentence. There can be a suspended imprisonment granted. Also, a "time served" can be render by the judge, in which the offender can be released. If an offender is convicted of two or more prison sentences a judge can arrange the sentences to run together or separate time.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The goal of the indeterminate sentencing during the beginning of the 20th Century was rehabilitation based on the belief…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To address the question as to what style of sentencing guidelines I would prefer to be used within my state, I would have to sway towards indeterminate sentencing. The end goal is to rehabilitate those who enter the prison system for crimes they have committed. For most, they will eventually reenter society after completing their respective prison sentence. The hope is that those incarcerated have completed rehabilitative programs and can now be productive members of society. We as a society need to understand that law enforcement simply can’t arrest their way out of all the crimes committed on a daily basis. Additionally, each person’s situation should be examined separately. This includes examining the crime committed, the person’s criminal…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To me Indeterminate Sentencing is a very degraded and/or very disturbed type of sentencing. In this sentencing a legislature is the one who has say as to what the terms will be for the crime that has been committed and a judge gets the decision as to what the sentence will be for the offender. As I look at this information I feel that the judge should have a say in what the sentence will be, but not have all the power as to what it will be. A Parole Board gets to determine as to what the amount of time is that the offender will spend in prison for the crime he or she has committed. In this type of sentencing, one of the guidelines is that when determining the sentence it should meet all of the needs of the offender.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges in the United States used indeterminate sentencing for nearly 45 years. This type of sentencing has a set limit of incarceration that a convict may serve for the crime committed. If the judge gives an offender two to five years imprisonment, then that offender will serve a minimum of two years but will serve no more than five years. This system was put into place to make the offender in their release with good behavior in prison.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open-ended sentencing doesn’t state a definitive period of time that the offender will serve but rather a range whereby the convicted criminal may be eligible to leave depending on the states discretionary perception of rehabilitative potential, a punishment reserved for ‘dangerous prisoners’ (Human Rights Law Centre 2012). This continuous judgement is assessed by state parole boards whereby the inmates conduct is evaluated in order to determine their release back into the community as jail terms are sentenced as preventative detentions to incapacitate and prevent future harm of the offender (White and Perrone 2015: 499). Thus an element of individuality of sentencing becomes an additional factor with the state exercising discretion in order…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinate sentence is use by some states; the judge is who determinate the time that the offender will serve in jail. In this type of sentence, the judge can’t use discretion at the time of sentencing he only apply the law as it is. The period of time that these offenders will spend in jail cannot be change by parole board. In a determinate system, the offender knows when he will be released from jail. The released time is determinate by the judge. Overall, the judge has to review the pre-sentence and who the offender complaint with the court procedure before issue a date for the offender to be released. The determinate sentence is referring as “the sentence is determined”.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parole boards decided on release dates. The principle behind indeterminate sentences is the hope that prisons reconstruct some offenders, and that different people give feedback very differently to punishment. Prison officials usually like indeterminate sentencing because the prospect of earlier release gives prisoners the motivation to behave while locked behind bars. The argument with intermediate is according to many people, is that it puts too much influence into the hands of the parole board, leading to irrational and unjust results.for those who may not know parole means that the offender is allowed to serve the rest of her sentence under community watch. The offender is discharged from prison to be a part of the community, but not without some rules being involved. At a minimum, the offender will be required to check in regularly, with her parole officer. Any violation, like an arrest for a new crime or a failure to find and keep a job, can result in the person being sent back to prison also. Essentially meaning that minorities and etc get treated differently or more harshly than other races. While people who deserve a harsher sentence are…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinate Sentencing

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An indeterminate sentencing is a term of incarceration in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. When the minimum term is reached, the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. A judge can prescribe a particular term, after which an administrative body known as the parole board decides at what point the offender is to be released. A prisoner is aware that he or she is eligible for parole as soon as the minimum time has been served and that good behavior can further shorten the sentence.In determinate sentencing, a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. If the legislature deems that the punishment for a first-time armed robber is ten years, then the judge has no choice but to impose a sentence of ten years and the criminal will serve ten years minus good time before being freed. In good times sentencing, a reduction in time served by prisoners based on good behavior, conformity to rules, and ther positive actions. In truth-in-sentencing laws, legislative attempts to assure that convicts will serve approximately the terms to whinch they were initially sentenced. The sentencing ritual strongly lends itself to the concept of individualized justice. Most judges consider two factors above all others: the seriousness of the crime and any mitigating or aggravating…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Variation In Sentencing

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are many questions surrounding the sentencing process in the State of Georgia surrounding several crimes. Why is there a variation in the process depending on where the crime was committed, who committed it, who the victim was, how many cases are on back log? Why do we allow these factors to play a part in the decision making process? Serious violent crimes are subject to a mandatory minimum in the State of Georgia, if you are convicted of one of the seven deadly sins which consist of (Murder, Rape, Aggravated Sodomy, Aggravated Child Molestation, Aggravated Sexual Battery, Armed Robbery and Kidnapping)…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    State and federal

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sentencing has four major goals that are normally attributed to it: deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution. Retribution is from the 21 centuries model of “just deserts.” The main idea is that if someone breaks the law they should be punished. The other three uses more emphasize on protecting the public. The way they go about is how they differ. Deterrence focuses on the burdensome aspect of a punishment. This makes the offender think about what he or she is, has, or is about to do. This is to make a rational thought that the chance of getting caught is too high, not worth the risk. The idea is to make the person (specific deterrence) who may commit the crime so afraid of the punishment, and detour others (general deterrence) from committing the same crime.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goals Of Sentencing

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For instance, retribution is focused on retaliation; and is not particularly concerned with mitigating future crime. In contrast, deterrence is focused on preventing future crime, but its effectiveness as a general deterrence remains unproven. Likewise, rehabilitation is aimed at preventing future crime, but historically, it has failed to mitigate crime rates. On the other hand, incapacitation seeks to deprive the offender of his ability to commit future crimes, but, suggests, that offenders are incorrigible. The aforementioned sentencing goals are related to distinct sentencing models. These include determinate sentencing, where “state statues determine the length of incarceration” (Zhang, et al, 2014, 694); and indeterminate sentencing, which sets a range of time of confinement, which is dependent of the offenders conduct while incarcerated. Sentencing models are usually accompanied concurrent and or consecutive sentences. Under concurrent sentences, and offender serves a prescribed amount of time of confinement for multiple crimes committed together. In contrast, consecutive sentences require offenders to serve jail sentences for each crime separately, one after the…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An indeterminate sentence is the imposition of a sentence by imprisonment with no specific period of time set during sentencing. The actual time serve of the prisoner is determined during imprisonment based on the inmate's conduct. This type of sentences is customized for the prisoner to be able to rehabilitate.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The positive way to reflect on this opinion would to be look at how is the court dealing with offender and how the community is acting when offenders are going to jail and are no longer on the streets. The positives of the opinion stated are that the courts are giving serious offenders a longer jail sentence which is helping the law enforcement keep summary offences that are caused amongst the community contained. In the column graph below it shows the amount of males and females that received sentences from under 1 month to life imprisonment in Queensland. Although there are positives there are always negatives that try to shift other opinions about how effective sentencing and punishment is in achieve justice.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Philosophies

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    The factors that go into determining sentencing are broke into three steps. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. A factor that can change incarceration time is that of “good time”, this is when a reduction in time served by a prisoner is based on good behavior and other positive actions. This is said to promote discipline…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays