Preview

Miranda Warnings

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
260 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Miranda Warnings
MAIN POST: Do the Miranda warnings help too many criminals go free? no. the miranda RIGHTS. protect our freedoms. without them we could end up a police state.In the United States, the Miranda warning is a warning given by police to criminal suspects in police custody, or in a custodial situation, before they are asked questions relating to the commission of a crime. A custodial situation is where the suspects freedom of movement is restrained although he is not under arrest. An incriminating statement by a suspect will not constitute admissible evidence unless the suspect was advised of his or her "Miranda rights" and made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of those rights. However, police may request biographical information such
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Modern Law: The Miranda V. Arizona Case
    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page

    Modern Law: The Miranda V. Arizona Case

    The Miranda v. Arizona case is considered to be one of the most important and famous cases in modern law history that provided the foundation for some important legal provisions. It occurred in 1966 in Arizona, when a young man named Ernesto Miranda, a Mexican immigrant living in Phoenix, Arizona, was charged with robbery, kidnapping, and rape of a young woman several years prior the trial (Zalman, 2010). Before the suspect was interrogated, the police did not inform him of his constitutional right to remain silent which allowed the interrogators to get the confession. Given that this case provided the foundation for the right to remain silent, it became very famous and important. The present paper attempts to analyze the…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Study
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Study

    The second of the Supreme Court Cases to be discussed is Miranda V. Arizona. The importance of this case is that Miranda was interrogated without knowledge of his 5th amendment rights. In this specific case, the police arrested Miranda from his home in order to take him into investigation at the Phoenix police station. While Miranda was put on trial, he was not informed that he had a right to an attorney. From this the officers were able to retrieve a signed written statement from Miranda. Most importantly, this letter stated that Miranda had full knowledge of his legal rights. From the evidence found, Miranda was sentenced to prison for 20 to 30 years. From here the Supreme Court stated that, “...Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession…” (Miranda V Arizona).…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study
    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study

    2. I definitely feel like the Miranda Warning is still a valid concept. I feel like reminds the suspect that they still have rights and they are still innocent until proven guilty. Being a suspect of any crime is probably very scary and can be overwhelming with emotions.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    miranda v. arizona
    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    miranda v. arizona

    Supreme Court Decision: The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Miranda and it also enforced the Miranda warning to be given to a person being interrogated while in the custody of the police.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Module 8 Review And Critical Thinking
    • 303 Words
    • 1 Page

    Module 8 Review And Critical Thinking

    I think they should be required because someone might have something in thare that is personal that survied.…

    • 303 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

    Over the years the Miranda rights are used to ensure justice and preserve liberty ever since the case Miranda v. Arizona. All though people may see the Miranda Rights/ warning as an act of not trying to ensure justice it is because if we didn't use them today then there would be many more cases like Miranda v. Arizona and lead to a corruptio in our police stations atound th…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civics and Economics, the 14th Amendment
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Civics and Economics, the 14th Amendment

    Its obvious that we need the 14th amendment because a simple reason ; Equality. The 14th amendment is basically allowing everyone that is different then a what is considered to be a regular person and white man. Even though we have this we are still seen differently by some people but this amendment allows us to take action when they see us differently and try to do something about us. But to fully look into this situation we need to look at statistics. Lets look at the court case of Miranda v. Arizona first, in this court case it was decided that Miranda was treated unfairly under his 14th amendment. He confessed to a crime he had done without knowing that he was available to have a lawyer present while being questioned. He was therefore released under the court ruling that the due process clause of the 14th amendment had been violated because he was not told like he was supposed to that he has the right to remain silent, to have an attorney present, and, if the suspect cannot afford an attorney, to have one appointed by the state. He was later retried though without the confession and convicted. But clearly this is shown that those less educated on their rights and those different can still receive the equality they deserve and the information they need. But this also shows that our justice system is still able to punish everyone that needs to be…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Adams Supreme Court Case
    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Adams Supreme Court Case

    Miranda never knew he did not have to speak with the police was interrogated and confessed and was sentenced to jail. Later an attorney looked over the case and requested Judicial Review Claiming that Ernesto’s rights has been violated. In 1966 The Supreme Court overturned Miranda’s Conviction, and ruled that if a person is going to be taken in as a suspect they must be informed that they do have a right to and attorney. The suspect also has to be informed that the do not have to speak. The supreme court also ruled that if the suspect is not informed of these right the evidence obtained before hand can not be used in court. These rights are now known as the Miranda rights.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror

    First, individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus also known as the “great writ of liberty” guarantees that a person who is being held unjustly can go free (Habeas corpus, 2011). This is one of the reasons that make America so great because anyone who is detained can know the reason why they are being held and in so are allowed due process under the law. The Constitution protects the…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona
    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, ruled that the prosecution could not introduce Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal trial because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The police duty to give these warnings is compelled by the Constitution's Fifth Amendment, which gives a criminal suspect the right to refuse "to be a witness against himself," and Sixth Amendment, which guarantees criminal defendants the right to an attorney.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona
    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    The Miranda warning (often abbreviated to "Miranda," or "Mirandizing" a suspect) is the name of the formal warning that is required to be given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial situation) before they are interrogated, in accordance with the Miranda ruling. Its purpose is to ensure the accused are aware of, and reminded of, these rights under the U.S. Constitution, and that they know they can invoke them at any time during the interview.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona
    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    Creation of the Miranda rights has changed the relationship between citizen state and police suspects. Citizens now have the right to be informed and assurance that they will be protected by institutional power. Suspects can now anybody that they had nothing to with it. The Miranda warnings are rights that are not protected by the Constitution. They are simply a precaution to guarantee protection against self –incrimination. Without the Miranda rights, the treatment of criminals would not be fair.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Does Miranda Rights Mean To You
    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Does Miranda Rights Mean To You

    In conclusion, I believe that the Miranda Rights are and will forever be important to society. Everyone should have the right to an attorney, and also the right to remain silent. After reading this, what are your opinions on the Miranda Rights? Miranda Rights are very beneficial to people and the society of the United States of America. I encourage everyone to read about the Miranda Rights, because the person could learn a great deal of information on this specific…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Importance Of Privacy In Criminal Cases
    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Importance Of Privacy In Criminal Cases

    In criminal cases, there is always a need for evidence to convict the suspected criminal of breaking the law; however, because people have an expectation of privacy, warrants, legal permission to obtain evidence, are required before searching and/or seizing someone's things, writings, electronic data, etc. without the permission of the person being targeted. Before a warrant can be issued, there must be probable cause, sufficient reason to believe that a person committed a crime, present. This prevents people's privacy from being violated unnecessarily; however, there are some exceptions to this requirement. If the situation is deemed an emergency, then a warrant is not required, which means that it is possible that a person's right to privacy could be violated regardless of the warrant…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Search and Seizure
    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Search and Seizure

    I believe that search and seizure is very important for our country and our rights. Search and Seizure helps to protect our fourth amendment right, which is the right to privacy. The Search and seizure says that law enforcement cannot search or put anyone under arrest unless they have evidence to support that action (Murray). I believe that search and seizure is important to protecting our privacy rights. If police so not have any evidence against you, that they can’t search you, your car your house or anything.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics