Metrobus Strike Case
1.) Using the industrial relations model presented in the chapter (Figure 1.1), a. identify and name the actors in the case.
Labour (Employees & Associations) • Employees of Metrobus (drivers, mechanics, administrative staff, etc.) • The Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU)
Employers & Associations • Employers of Metrobus
Government & Associated Agencies • Mayor Dennis O'Keefe • Councillors • Government appointed mediator • Provincial government • Metrobus
End Users • Citizens (students, seniors, lower-income earners without vehicles, etc.) • Individuals who end up assisting those without transportation • Public protestors
b. discuss what external inputs you feel are more relevant in the case.
Legal Subsystems (Collective Bargaining) • Collective bargaining was attempted in order to resolve the Metrobus/employee contract issue • Relevant in this case because it is the desired outcome
Economic Subsystems (Product/Service Market) • Metrobus is relied on to supply a service to the residents of the city • Relevant in this case because a strike (stopping the service) will bring extra issues such as extra expenses to citizens & a reduction in government revenues
Economic Subsystems (Labour Market) • Metrobus supplies jobs to many residents of the city • Relevant in this case because a strike will leave Metrobus employees without jobs, therefore effecting their daily lives
Economic Subsystems (Money Market) • Metrobus supplies a constant flow of money into the economy • Relevant in this case because a strike will leave Metrobus employees without pay & financial security, citizens will have to spend money unexpectedly on alternative transportation (potentially more
Labour (Employees & Associations) • Employees of Metrobus (drivers, mechanics, administrative staff, etc.) • The Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU)
Employers & Associations • Employers of Metrobus
Government & Associated Agencies • Mayor Dennis O'Keefe • Councillors • Government appointed mediator • Provincial government • Metrobus
End Users • Citizens (students, seniors, lower-income earners without vehicles, etc.) • Individuals who end up assisting those without transportation • Public protestors
b. discuss what external inputs you feel are more relevant in the case.
Legal Subsystems (Collective Bargaining) • Collective bargaining was attempted in order to resolve the Metrobus/employee contract issue • Relevant in this case because it is the desired outcome
Economic Subsystems (Product/Service Market) • Metrobus is relied on to supply a service to the residents of the city • Relevant in this case because a strike (stopping the service) will bring extra issues such as extra expenses to citizens & a reduction in government revenues
Economic Subsystems (Labour Market) • Metrobus supplies jobs to many residents of the city • Relevant in this case because a strike will leave Metrobus employees without jobs, therefore effecting their daily lives
Economic Subsystems (Money Market) • Metrobus supplies a constant flow of money into the economy • Relevant in this case because a strike will leave Metrobus employees without pay & financial security, citizens will have to spend money unexpectedly on alternative transportation (potentially more