Preview

Mesopotamia Compare And Contrast

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mesopotamia Compare And Contrast
Egypt and mesopotamia are two of the world's oldest civilizations in history. These two civilizations both relied heavily on their geography to help them create and maintain their rule. Egyptian and Mesopotamian societies existed on the banks of major rivers. Egypt is located in northern africa along the nile river. Mesopotamia, meaning in greek, between two rivers, resides on what was once known as the fertile crescent on the Tigris and the euphrates rivers located in the Middle east. These rivers allowed for these civilizations to thrive in their harsh desert climates. For the Egyptians the nile was generally predictable and calm with annual floods. The Tigris and Euphrates rivers are much more unpredictable and faster flowing with occasionally overflooding. These rivers were vital for irrigation, transportation, and …show more content…
These civilizations carried out their role of kingship in very different ways. The Egyptians operated under a centralized government. In egypt the highest religious leader and main authority was the pharaoh. The pharaoh was at the top of all social classes and was recognized to be a god like figure and had an immense power over egyptian society. Egyptian pharaohs were referred to as the sons of Re and the egyptians believed he was a living god on earth. The pharaoh was expected to maintain universal peace and order through his kingship and divine power. The pharaoh ruled through bueaucracy and his highest ranking assistant was a vizier. The pharaoh would lead projects such as pyramids, tombs and statues that covered Egypt.The Mesopotamians had separate, self controlled city state governments. Each city state worked as a separate political and ecommic units so there was less national unity under Mesopotamian governnment. Mesopotamians had a less detinct social hierarchies. Mesopotamia the monarchs are priest kings whom serve the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    From 3500-1500 BCE, Mesopotamia and Egypt emerged as two of the first river- valley civilizations. Although they came to be around the same time, they became different in their cultural aspects, such as universal views and classes, and economies due to differences in commerce.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia vs. Egypt

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Despite the fact that both Mesopotamia and Egypt were first developing around the same time, natural forces and the environment caused variations in many cultural developments such as political systems, religious views, and much more. Their biggest differences were dependent on the river-valleys they lived in and how that affected the way they managed agriculture, as well as their view of their gods. One similarity that Mesopotamia and Egypt did have was that both civilizations developed a system of writing and keeping records.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia and Egypt are both similar because of their civilizations being located on a river system. The Egyptians had the Nile River and its delta that led in to the Mediterranean Sea. The Sumerians had the Tigris and Euphrates rivers that led into the Persian Gulf. Both of these rivers flooded, depositing silt onto the ground that would fertilize the soil. This would allow for agriculture and for huge populations to settle and grow in these regions. The Nile River flooded annually and the Tigris and Euphrates flooded randomly which could lead to a good or bad crop season. For ancient civilizations to exist, they needed to be located along rivers because they were a source of fresh water that is necessary for life. It also gives the settlement a good form of transportation up and down the river. Also, the water is used for farm animals to drink.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Last, in Mesopotamia they had a government based strongly on Theocracy and in Egypt, they had a government based on the Pharaohs. The Mesopotamians thought the gods ruled the land and they were their leaders and in contrast, the Egyptians had Pharaohs who they followed and believed to be their leaders. Ultimately, the floodings of the two large rivers affected every aspect, of both the Mesopotamians and Egyptians way of life. Due to these floodings Mesopotamians and Egyptians formed two very different ways of life. These different views of life caused two different religions to form between Mesopotamia and Egypt. Due to the differences in religions in Mesopotamia and Egypt this caused their way of government, to be much…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt was created with a settlement along a narrow strip of land that was also made fertile by the Nile river. Flooding also occurred but unlike Mesopotamia it was very predictable flooding and create a regular cycle of flooding then planting and lastly harvesting which kept repeating itself with every flood. The settlement had an intricate network of irrigation ditches. Egypt was mostly known for the lower region that focused around the Nile delta which flows directly into the Mediterranean Sea. Another benefit of Egypt’s location was the reliable transportation that the Nile provided the Egyptian settlements.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Along with their outlooks being different, so were the structures of their government and cities. The Mesopotamian civilization was organized in a dozen or more different city states, while the Egyptian civilization maintained unity. This being, cities in Egypt were far less important than in Mesopotamia. Each city-state in Mesopotamia was ruled by a different king, that claimed to be that city's patron deity. The Egyptians were ruled by a pharaoh, believed to be a god in human form. This shows that were ruled in very different ways, by very different people. It also shows how different the structure of their cities were.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the life of Egypt and Mesopotamia there were similarities and differences. There are comparisons in culture, social class, and gender. Also parallelism in their religions existed however, the differences found, clearly define them as individual entities.…

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What might be the meaning of the animals represented on the Lyre sound box (fig. 2.14a)?…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have come up with certain criteria they believe a society must obtain in order for it to be considered a civilization. These criteria are that the society must be stratified, must contain monumental architecture, and must have a formal system of law and order. Other historians may argue that writing must be part of a society in order for it to be considered a civilization, but that is not a criterion that is certainly agreed upon. According to this definition of a civilization, I conclude that both the ancient societies of Mesopotamia and Athens can both be considered civilizations.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First and foremost, Ancient Egypt has two pieces of land called the ´black land´ and the ´red land´. The black land, which is used for growing crops and this piece of land was the only place where the people of Ancient Egypt could farm, this is because the soil was rich and fertile. The red land is a barren desert, where nothing grows. It protected Egypt from invasions from other countries near them. It also provided Egypt with precious metals and semi-precious metals. Before 5000 B.C., the majority of the land was full of vegetation, there was no need to depend on the Nile. Around 5000 B.C., the vegetation started to dry up and become desert, they were forced to move towards the Nile River, since it was the only source of fresh water.Before 3100 B.C., there were no capital cities. Some areas including, Abydos, Hierakonpolis, and Naqaba were areas that could be consider centers of settlements and tombs. Mesopotamia is between two rivers, the Tigris and Euphrates. Mesopotamia is made up of two regions, northern and southern. Northern Mesopotamia has fertile land due to the seasonal rains and the rivers flowing up and down the mountains. It is made up plains and hills. Early settlers used the land for farming. Southern Mesopotamia´s cities developed along the river that flow through. It is made up of marshy areas, wide, flat, land with no vegetation that grows. Early settlers had to to deliver water to the land for farming. They depend on their neighbouring countries for natural resources since they run low on them.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Geological features can positively and negatively effect the development of a nation or a region. Ancient civilizations such as ancient Egypt and ancient Mesopotamia drastically relied on the resources rivers provided for them. Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamian both had similar and different reasons and benefits for using the rivers.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like most civilizations of that time, the power of the people was held in the hands of the person in charge of the grain. In both Mesopotamia and Egypt, someone was appointed to be in charge of the grain and other agricultural products, on the other hand, the person in Mesopotamian culture that was in charge of the grain was usually a priest, and in Egypt it was usually an appointed official. City-states made up the Mesopotamian societies, and often neighboring empires invaded each other. Conversely, the Egyptian invaders were mostly from other areas of Africa rather than neighboring people. The reason behind the different types of invasion was due to the way the civilizations were split up. Egypt split in two, lower and upper Egypt, and Mesopotamia did not have definite territories in it, because of the way it was split, it effected where trading was possible. Trade routes accurately illustrate the way both societies interacted with surrounding empires. Both empires traded with the surrounding peoples, however, the Egyptians expanded their trade networks much farther than the Mesopotamians. The two civilizations did however trade with each…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neither of them had a government system like the United States has today. In Mesopotamia, priests and kings ran the cities. In Egypt pharaohs and priests were the main leaders but other wealthy people helped lead. So both civilizations had a very similar power chain. Their writing however was not the same at all. The egyptians wrote in hieroglyphs while the people of Mesopotamia wrote in cuneiform.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt was a monarchy and Mesopotamia was a democracy. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was in charge of making laws and owned everything, meanwhile, in Mesopotamia, there were many kings in different city-states and they did not own people’s belongings. A difference is that the land was measured differently. In Mesopotamia, they divided the land into city-states. Also, both civilizations thought differently about their kings. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was considered a god. Meanwhile, Mesopotamia believed that the kings weren’t gods so they didn’t worship them as gods. At one point, when the Assyrians were expanding a lot, the city-state got cut up into provinces. The ancient egyptians wrote hieroglyphics about the profits, costs and laws civilians made. In Mesopotamia, the scribes would draw pictograms on clay boards. While Egyptians trusted their justice goddess to teach right from wrong among their citizens, Mesopotamians would follow Hammurabi's law that demanded and Eye for an Eye. With this law, the offended person would be free to do the same thing he suffered at the hands of the criminal. In Mesopotamia would have a voice and a vote for city matters as going to war or not meanwhile Egypt didn’t have a voice. Everything was decided by the Pharaoh. So after all, there are differences and similarities between these dissimilar civilizations that…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    River civilization is nearly common, this is not just restricted to the Nile River in Egypt or the Tigris and Euphrates in Mesopotamia. The way both lived and the way culture was shaped in their civilization were utterly distinct. Egypt is found in the Nile Valley, in the Northeastern part of Africa and Mesopotamia was a primitive territory in the Eastern Mediterranean joint in the Northeast through the Zagros Mountains and in the Southeast through the Arabian Plateau, equivalents to today’s mainly Iraq, but too a portion of today’s Turkey, Iran etc. Egypt’s culture was well known for their substantial cultural approach in every section of human proficiency, from their fine art, to their applied science and their beliefs. Furthermore Mesopotamia had a diverse society in which they were only tied by their writing, their deity, and their perspective regarding females.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays